Physico-Chemical Concepts on the Fate of Organic Compounds

  • James W. Moore
  • S. Ramamoorthy
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

The concentration, behavior, and eventual fate of an organic compound in the aquatic environment are determined by a number of physico-chemical and biological processes. These processes include sorption-desorption, volatilization, and chemical and biological transformation. Solubility, vapor pressure, and the partition coefficient of a compound determine its concentration and residence time in water and hence the subsequent processes in that phase. The movement of an organic compound is largely dependent upon the physico-chemical interactions with other components of the aquatic environment. Such components include suspended solids, sediments, and biota.

Keywords

Hydrolysis Naphthalene PCBs Biphenyl Volatility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Briggs, G.G. 1973. A simple relationship between soil adsorption of organic chemicals and their octanol/water partition coefficients. Proceedings of the 7th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 1:83–86.Google Scholar
  2. Dreisbach, R.R. 1952. Pressure-volume-temperature relationship of organic compounds. Handbook Publishers, Sandusky, Ohio, pp. 3–260.Google Scholar
  3. Goring, C.A.I. 1967. Physical aspects of soil in relation to the action of soil fungicides. Annual Review of Phytopathology 5:285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hamaker, J.W., and J.M. Thompson. 1972. Adsorption. In: C.A.I. Goring and J.W. Hamaker (Eds.), Organic chemicals in the soil environment, Vol. 1, Dekker, New York. pp. 49–144.Google Scholar
  5. Hassett, J.J., J.C. Means, W.L. Banwart, and S.G. Wood. 1980. Sorption properties of sediments and energy related pollutants. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Publication No. EPA-600/3-80-041, Athens, Georgia, 150 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Haque, R., and D. Schmedding. 1975. A method of measuring the water solubility of hydrophobic chemicals: solubility of five polychlorinated biphenyls. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 14:13–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karickhoff, S.W. 1981. Semi-empirical estimation of sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments and soils. Chemosphere 10:833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kenaga, E.E., and C.A.I. Goring. 1980. Relationship between water solubility, soil sorption, octanol-water partitioning, and concentration of chemicals in biota. In: J.G. Eaton, P.R. Parrish, and A.C. Hendricks (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 78–115.Google Scholar
  9. Lambert, S.M. 1968. Omega (Ω), a useful index of soil sorption equilibria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16:340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lambert, S.M., P.E. Porter, and H. Schieferstein. 1965. Movement and sorption of chemicals applied to the soil. Weeds 13:185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leo, A., C. Hansen, and D. Elkins. 1971. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chemical Reviews 71:525–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liss, P.S., and P.G. Slater. 1974. Flux of gases across the air-sea interface. Nature 247:181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mabey, W., and T. Mill. 1978. Critical review of hydrolysis of organic compounds in water under environmental conditions. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 7:383–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackay, D., and P.J. Leinonen. 1975. Rate of evaporation of low-solubility contaminants from water bodies to atmosphere. Environmental Science and Technology 9:1178–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mill, T. 1979. Structure reactivity correlations for environmental reactions. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Publication No. EPA-560/11-79-012, Washington, D.C., 58 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Mill, T., W.R. Mabey, and D.G. Hendry. 1979. Test protocols for environmental processes: oxidation in water. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Draft Report, EPA Contract No. 68-03-2227, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Moriguchi, I. 1975. Quantitative structure-activity studies. I. Parameters relating to hydrophobicity. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (Tokyo) 23:247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Quayle, O.R. 1953. The parachors of organic compounds. Chemical Reviews 53:439–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, J.H., D.C. Bomberger, Jr., and D.L. Haynes. 1980. Prediction of the volatilization rates of high volatility chemicals from natural water bodies. Environmental Science and Technology 14:1332–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tinsley, I.J. 1979. Chemical concepts in pollutant behavior. Wiley, New York, 265 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Tute, M.S. 1971. Principles and practice of Hansch analysis: a guide to structure-activity correlation for the medicinal chemist. Advances in Drug Research 6:1–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wallhofer, P.R., N. Koniger, and O. Hutzinger. 1973. Analab Res. Notes 13:14.Google Scholar
  23. Weast, R.C. (Ed.). 1974. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 54th edition. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio, pp. D-162–D-188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Moore
    • 1
  • S. Ramamoorthy
    • 1
  1. 1.Alberta Environmental CentreVegrevilleCanada

Personalised recommendations