Advertisement

A Learning Analysis of Spatial Concept Development in Infancy

  • C. Donald Heth
  • Edward H. Cornell
Part of the Springer Series in Cognitive Development book series (SSCOG)

Abstract

Students of learning and students of development have a similar problem: characterizing change in the behavior of an organism. In both domains of inquiry the problem has been so intractable that rather severe limiting assumptions have been required. Although these assumptions were undoubtedly viewed originally as tactical decisions in the emergence of each discipline, over the years they have resulted in two quite different approaches to the study of behavior change.

Keywords

Process Variable Unconditioned Stimulus Classical Conditioning Transition Rule Experimental Child Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brainerd, C. J. Neo-Piagetian training experiments revisited: Is there any support for the cognitive-developmental stage hypothesis? Cognition, 1973, 2, 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brainerd, C. J. Learning research and Piagetian theory. In L. S. Siegel & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical essays on the theory. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Brainerd, C. J. Markovian interpretations of conservation learning. Psychological Review, 1979, 86, 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brainerd, C. J., Howe, M. L., & Desrochers, A. The general theory of two-stage learning: A mathematical review with illustrations from memory development. Psychological Bulletin, 1982, 91, 634–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornell, E. H. Learning to find things: A reinterpretation of object permanence studies. In L. S. Siegel & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: Critical essays on the theory. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. Cornell, E. H. The effects of cue distinctiveness on infants’ manual search. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981, 32, 330–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curry, R. E. A random search algorithm for laboratory computers. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1975, 7, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estes, W. K. Memory and conditioning. In F. J. McGuigan & D. B. Lumsden (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to conditioning and learning. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, K. W. A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 1980, 87, 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freud, S. A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Permabooks, 1958. (Originally published, 1920.)Google Scholar
  11. Gallagher, J. M. Piaget’s concept of equilibration: Biological, logical, and cybernetic roots. In M. H. Appel & L. S. Goldberg (Eds.), Topics in cognitive development: Equilibration (Vol. 1 ). New York: Plenum, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, E. J. Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. Greeno, J. G. Paired-associate learning with short-term retention: Mathematical analysis and data regarding identification of parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 4, 430–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greeno, J. G., & Steiner, T. E. Markovian processes with identifiable states: General considerations and applications to all-or-none learning. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H. Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
  16. Inhelder, B., Sinclair, H., & Bovet, M. Learning and the development of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  17. Kamin, L. J. Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  18. Kendler, H. H. “What is learned?”-A theoretical blind alley. Psychological Review, 1952, 59, 269–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimble, G. H. Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.Google Scholar
  20. Langer, J. Disequilibrium as a source of development. In P. H. Mussen, J. Langer, & M. Covington (Eds.), Trends and issues in developmental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Langley, P., & Simon, H. A. The central role of learning in cognition. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. Lasky, R. E., Romano, N., & Wenters, J. Spatial localization in children after changes in position. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980, 29, 225–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawler, R. W. The progressive construction of mind. Cognitive Science, 1981, 5, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine, M. A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.Google Scholar
  25. Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditioning stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959, 52, 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Millar, W. S. The role of visual-holding cues and the simultanizing strategy in infant operant learning. British Journal of Psychology, 1974, 65, 505–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Millar, W. S., & Schaffer, H. R. The influence of spatially displaced feedback on infant operant conditioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972, 14, 442–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Piaget, J. The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books, 1954. (Originally published, 1937.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piaget, J. Development and learning. In R. E. Ripple & V. N. Rockcastle (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered: A report on the conference on cognitive studies and curriculum development. Ithaca, NY: School of Education, Cornell University, 1964.Google Scholar
  30. Piaget, J. Problems of equilibration. In M. H. Appel & L. S. Goldberg (Eds.), Topics in cognitive development: Equilibration (Vol. 1 ). New York: Plenum, 1977.Google Scholar
  31. Polson, P. G. Statistical methods for a general theory of all-or-none learning. Psychometrika. 1970, 35, 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Polson, P. G., & Huizinga, D. Statistical methods for absorbing Markov-chain models for learning: Estimation and identification. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rescorla, R. A., & Holland, P. C. Some behavioral approaches to the study of learning. In M. R. Rosenzweig & E. L. Bennet (Eds.), Neural mechanisms of learning and memory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  34. Rozeboom, W. W. The concept of “memory.” Psychological Record, 1965, 15, 329–368.Google Scholar
  35. Sameroff, A. J., & Cavanaugh, P. J. Learning in infancy: A developmental perspective. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  36. Sameroff, A. J., & Harris, A. E. Dialectical approaches to early thought and language. In M. Bornstein & W. Kessen (Eds.), Psychological development from infancy: Image to intention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  37. Seligman, M. E. P. On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seligman, M. E. P., & Johnston, J. C. A cognitive theory of avoidance learning. In F. J. McGuigan & D. B. Lumsden (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to conditioning and learning. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
  39. Seligman, M. E. P., Maier, S. F., & Solomon, R. L. Unpredictable and uncontrollable aversive events. In F. R. Brush (Ed.), Aversive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  40. Shettleworth, S. J. Constraints on learning. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 4 ). New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  41. Sokolov, Y. N. Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan, 1963.Google Scholar
  42. Stamps, L. E., & Porges, S. W. Heart rate conditioning in newborn infants: Relationships among conditionability, heart rate variability, and sex. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevenson, H. W. Children’s learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.Google Scholar
  44. Thorndike, E. L. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review: Series of Monograph Supplements, 1898, 2(4, Whole No. 8).Google Scholar
  45. Wagner, A. R. Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  46. Wagner, A. R., Rudy, J. W., & Whitlow, J. W. Rehearsal in animal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 407–426. (Monograph.)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Werner, H. The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  48. White, S. The learning theory approach. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1 ). New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  49. Wilcox, S., & Katz, S. The ecological approach to development: An alternative to cognitivism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981, 32, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Donald Heth
  • Edward H. Cornell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations