Skip to main content

Microdiskectomy versus Endoscopic Diskectomy

  • Chapter
Book cover Current Techniques in Neurosurgery

Since the first diskectomy was performed in 1934, major advances have been made in the understanding of the regional anatomy and pathophysiology of lumbar disk herniation. In addition, major technological advances in image intensification and materials engineering have allowed surgeons to perform lumbar diskectomy through increasingly limited exposures: In an era of increased cost containment, minimally invasive procedures are being emphasized to provide equivalent or superior results while minimizing perioperative morbidity and its resultant costs to insurers and to society as a whole. Although currently somewhat limited, endoscopic diskectomy may provide a superior alternative to conventional microdiskectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS: Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of spinal canal.N Engl J Med1934, 211:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burman MS: Myeloscopy or direct visualization of the spinal canal and its contents.J Bone Joint Surg1931, 13:695–696

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pool JL: Direct visualization of dorsal nerve roots of cauda equina by means of myeloscope.Arch Neurol Psychiatry1938, 39:1308–1312

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hijikata S, Yamagishi N, Nakayama T,et al.: Percutaneous discectomy: A new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. Journal of Toden Hospital 1975, 5:5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kambin P, Gellman H: Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine: Apreliminary report.Clin Orthop1983, 174:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schreiber A, Leu HI: Percutaneous nucleotomy: Technique with discoscopy.Orthopedics1991, 14:439–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathews HH: Transforaminal endoscopic microdiscectomy.Neurosurg Clin North Am1996, 7(1):59–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Onik G, Maroon JC, Davis GW: Automated percutaneous discectomy: A prospective multi-institutional study.Neurosurgery1990, 2:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zahrawi F: Microlumbar discectomy.Spine1994, 19:1070–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bookwalter JW III, Busch MD, Nicely D: Ambulatory surgery is safe and effective in radicular disk disease.Spine1994, 19(5):526–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman MH: Outpatient conventional laminotomy and disc excision.Spine1995, 20(3):353–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Savitz MH: Same–day microsurgical arthroscopic lateralapproach laser–assisted (SMALL) fluoroscopic discectomy.J Neurosurg1994, 80(6):1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer HM, Brock M: Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: Surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy.J Neurosurg1993, 78(2):216–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Surgical Technique: MEDTM System [introducer set]. Memphis: Sofamor Danek Group; 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kambin P, Zhou L: Arthroscopic discectomy of the lumbar spine.Clin Orthop Related Res1997, 337:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kambin P: Arthroscopic microdiscectomy of the lumbar spine.Clin Sports Med1993, 12(1):143–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirabayashi S, Kumano K, Ogawa Y,et al.: Microdiscectomy and second operation for lumbar disc herniation.Spine1993, 18(15):2206–2211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer HM, Brock M: Complications of percutaneous diskectomy. In Complications of Spinal Surgery. Neurosurgical Topics. Edited by Tarlov EC. Park Ridge, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons; 1991:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kambin P, Cohen LF:Arthroscopic discectomyversus nucleotomy techniques.Clin Sports Med1993, 12:587–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayer HM: Spine update: Percutaneous lumbar disc surgerySpine1994, 19(23):2719–2723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Faulhauer K, Manicke C: Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disk.Acta Neurochir1995, 133:107–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Current Medicine, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waitze, A.S., Comey, C.H., Rodts, G.E., Haid, R.W. (1998). Microdiskectomy versus Endoscopic Diskectomy. In: Salcman, M. (eds) Current Techniques in Neurosurgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9350-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9350-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9350-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics