A Framework for Multi-Stage Unsteady Flow Calculations

  • Michael Giles

Abstract

This paper describes a mathematical approach to the calculation of unsteady flow in multi-stage turbomachinery. An asymptotic formulation is used, with the small asymptotic parameter being the level of unsteadiness in each blade row. The baseline flow is the nonlinear steady flow that is computed by many existing multi-stage calculation methods. The first order linear perturbation is the unsteady flow field arising from stator/rotor interactions between neighboring blade rows. The second order correction contains the information about the time-averaged effect of unsteadiness on the mean flow. The advantage of this asymptotic approach is that it leads to a set of equations which can be solved numerically very much more cheaply than the full nonlinear unsteady flow equations, while still retaining the key features of the flow.

Keywords

Vortex 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Ada85]
    J. J. Adamczyk. Model equations for simulating flows in multistage turbomachinery. ASME Paper 95-GT-226, June 1985.Google Scholar
  2. [AGEG91]
    R. S. Abhari, G. R. Guenette, A. H. Epstein, and M. B. Giles. Comparison of time-resolved turbine rotor blade heat transfer measurements and numerical calculations. ASME Paper 91GT-268, June 1991.Google Scholar
  3. [Bat67]
    G. K. Batchelor. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. [Che88]
    Y. S. Chen. 3-D stator-rotor interaction of the SSME. AIAA Paper 88–3095, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. [EAM77]
    J. I. Erdos, E. Alzner, and W. McNally. Numerical Solution of Periodic Transonic Flow Through a Fan Stage. AIAA Journal, 15 (11): 1559–1568, Nov 1977.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [EGSS89]
    A. H. Epstein, M. B. Giles, T. Shang, and A. K. Sehra. Blade row interaction effects on compressor measurements. AGARD 74th Specialists Meeting on Unsteady Aerodynamic Phenomena in Turbomachines, Aug 1989.Google Scholar
  7. [Fou86]
    A. Fourmaux. Unsteady flow calculation in cascades. ASME Paper 86-GT-178, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. [Gi188]
    M. B. Giles. Calculation of unsteady wake/rotor interaction. AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 4 (4): 356–362, July/August 1988.Google Scholar
  9. [Gi189]
    M. B. Giles. Numerical methods for unsteady turbomachinery flow. VKI Lecture Series 1989–06, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. [Gi190]
    M. B. Giles. Stator/rotor interaction in a transonic turbine. AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 6(5), September-October 1990.Google Scholar
  11. [HC87]
    K. C. Hall and E. F. Crawley. Calculation of unsteady flows in turbomachinery using the linearized Euler equations. Proceedings of Fourth Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines and Propellers, Sept 1987.Google Scholar
  12. [Hod84]
    H. P. Hodson. An inviscid blade-to-blade prediction of a wakegenerated unsteady flow. ASME Paper 84-GT-43, June 1984.Google Scholar
  13. [LG91]
    D. R. Lindquist and M. B. Giles. On the validity of linearized unsteady Euler equations with shock capturing. AIAA Paper 91–1958, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. [Ni78]
    R.-H. Ni. A rational analysis of periodic flow perturbations in supersonic two-dimensional cascade. ASME Paper 78-GT-176, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. [NS75]
    R.-H. Ni and F. Sisto. Numerical computation of nonstationary aerodynamics of flat plate cascades in compressible flow. ASME Paper 75-GT-5, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. [Rai87]
    M. M. Rai. Navier-Stokes simulations of rotor-stator interaction using patched and overlaid grids. AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 3 (5): 387–396, 1987.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [Rai89]
    M. M. Rai. Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes simulations of turbine rotor-stator interaction. AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 5 (3): 305–319, May-June 1989.Google Scholar
  18. [Sch79]
    H. Schlichting. Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. [SG91]
    A. Saxer and M. Giles. Quasi-3D nonreflecting boundary conditions for Euler equation calculations. AIAA Paper 91–1603, June 1991.Google Scholar
  20. [Smi71]
    S. N. Smith. Discrete frequency sound generation in axial flow turbomachines. University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering Report CUED/A-Turbo/TR 29, 1971.Google Scholar
  21. [SS90]
    A. Suddhoo and P. Stow. Simulation of inviscid blade row interaction using a linearised potential code. AIAA Paper 901916, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. [VC84]
    J.M. Verdon and J.R. Caspar. A linearized unsteady aerodynamic analysis for transonic cascades. Journal of Fluids Mechanics, 149: 403–429, 1984.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [Whi82]
    D. S. Whitehead. The calculation of steady and unsteady transonic flow in cascades. University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering Report CUED/A-Turbo/TR 118, 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Giles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aeronautics and AstronauticsM.I.T.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations