# Experiment Designs for Intercropping Experiments

Chapter

## Abstract

The following discussion pertains to intercropping experiments such as those described in the preceding chapters, as well as to the design for all comparative experiments. It should be realized that the entire subject of experiment design (the arrangement of treatments in an experiment) cannot be covered in a single chapter or even a single book. We can, however, give some guidelines for the selection and use of experiment designs for some of the simpler intercropping experiments. Some of the experiment designs with less complicated statistical analyses will be illustrated. The ideas in this chapter have been presented and discussed in more detail by Federer (1984).

### Keywords

Placebo Sugar Maize Covariance Assure## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### Literature Cited

- Besag, J.E. and R.A. Kempton (1986). Analysis of field experiments using neighbouring plots.
*Biometrics***42**, 231–251.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox (1964). An analysis of transformations (with discussion).
*J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B*,**26**, 211–252.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Choomuang, M. (1988). A method of analysis of intercropping experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Cochran, W.G. and G.M. Cox (1957).
*Experimental Designs*, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar - Cox, C.P. (1958). The analysis of latin square designs with individual curvatures in one direction.
*J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B*,**20**, 193–204.MATHGoogle Scholar - Ezumah, H.C., W.T. Federer, and G.O. Myers (1991). Intercropping cassava with grain legumes in humid Africa. 1. Cowpea yields. BU-1108-M in the Technical Report Series of the Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Federer, W.T. (1951). Evaluation of variance components from a group of experiments with multiple classifications. In
*Research Bulletin 380*, Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College, pp. 241–310.Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1955).
*Experimental Design—Theory and Application*. Macmillan, New York. (Republished by Oxford and IBH Publishing, Calcutta, 1967.)Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1961). Augmented designs with one-way elimination of heterogeneity.
*Biometrics***17**, 447–473.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1975). The misunderstood split plot. In
*Applied Statistics*(R.P. Gupta, ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 9–39.Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1976a). Sampling, blocking, and model considerations for the completely randomized, randomized complete block, and incomplete block experiment designs.
*Biometrische Z.***18**, 511–525.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1976b). Sampling, blocking, and model considerations for
*r*-row by*c*-column designs.*Biometrische Z.***18**, 595–607.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1977). Sampling, blocking, and model considerations for split plot and split block designs.
*Biometrical J.***19**, 181–200.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1980–81). Some recent results in experiment design with a bibliography.
*Internat. Statist. Rev.***48**, 357–368;MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1980–81). Some recent results in experiment design with a bibliography.
*Internat. Statist. Rev.***49**, 95–109 and 185–197.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1984). Principles of statistical design with special reference to experiment and treatment design. In
*Statistics, An Appraisal*(H.A. David and H.T. David, eds.), The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. (1991).
*Statistics and Society. Data Collection and Interpretation*, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. and L.N. Balaam (1972).
*Bibliography on Experiment and Treatment Design Pre-1968*. Published for the International Statistical Institute by Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. and K.E. Basford (1991). Competing effects designs and models for two-dimensional field arrangements.
*Biometrics***47**, 1461–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T., R.C. Nair, and D. Raghavarao (1975a). Some augmented row-column designs.
*Biometrics***31**, 361–373.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. and D. Raghavarao (1975b). On augmented designs.
*Biometrics***31**, 29–35.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Federer, W.T. and B.T. Scully (1988). A parsimonious statistical design and breeding procedure for evaluating and selecting desirable characteristics over environments. BU-960-M in the Technical Report Series of the Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Federer, W.T. and T.P. Speed (1987). Measures of block design efficiency recovering interblock information.
*Transactions, Fourth Army Conference on Applied Mathematics and Computing, ARO Report 87–1*, pp. 781–786.Google Scholar - Federer, W.T. and G.F. Sprague (1951). A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials: II. Error, year × variety, location × variety, and variety components.
*Agronomy J.***43**, 535–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fisher, R.A. (1935).
*The Design of Experiments*(8th edn. in 1966), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar - Hedayat, A. and W.T. Federer (1974). Pairwise and variance balanced incomplete block designs.
*Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.***26**, 331–338.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kempton, R.A. (1982). Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials.
*J. Agric. Sci.***98**, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Khare, M. and W.T. Federer (1981). A simple construction procedure for resolvable incomplete block designs for any number of treatments.
*Biometrical J.***23**, 121–132.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns, and L.P. Lefkoviteh (1986). Stability analysis: Where do we stand?
*Crop Sci.***26**, 894–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mead, R. (1988).
*The Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles for Practical Application*. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Chapter 2.Google Scholar - Mead, R. and J. Riley (1981). A review of statistical ideas relevant to intercropping research (with discussion).
*J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series A*,**144**, 462–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nair, R.C. (1976). Some contributions to the theory of nonadditivity in data analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Patterson, H.D. and E.R. Williams (1976). A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs.
*Biometrika***63**, 83–92.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Preece, D.A. (1982). Balance and designs: Another terminological muddle.
*Utilitas Math.***21C**, 85–186.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Raktoe, B.L., A. Hedayat, and W.T. Federer (1981).
*Factorial Designs*. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar - Shafiq, M. and W.T. Federer (1979). Generalized
*N*-ary balanced block designs.*Bio-metrika***66**, 115–123.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Smith, H.F. (1938). An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops.
*J. Agric. Sci.***28**, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1980).
*Statistical Methods*, 7th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar - Verma, M.M., G.S. Chahal, and B.R. Murty (1978). Limitations of conventional regression analysis: A proposed modification.
*Theoret. Appl. Genetics***53**, 89–91.Google Scholar - Yates, F. (1933). The principles of orthogonality and confounding in replicated experiments.
*J. Agric. Sci.***23**, 108–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yates, F. (1937). The design and analysis of factorial experiments.
*Imperial Bureau of Soil Science, Technical Communication***35**, 1–95.Google Scholar - Yates, F. and W.G. Cochran (1938). The analysis of groups of experiments.
*J. Agric. Sci.***28**, 556–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993