Experiment Designs for Intercropping Experiments

  • Walter T. Federer
Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SSS)

Abstract

The following discussion pertains to intercropping experiments such as those described in the preceding chapters, as well as to the design for all comparative experiments. It should be realized that the entire subject of experiment design (the arrangement of treatments in an experiment) cannot be covered in a single chapter or even a single book. We can, however, give some guidelines for the selection and use of experiment designs for some of the simpler intercropping experiments. Some of the experiment designs with less complicated statistical analyses will be illustrated. The ideas in this chapter have been presented and discussed in more detail by Federer (1984).

Keywords

Placebo Sugar Maize Covariance Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Besag, J.E. and R.A. Kempton (1986). Analysis of field experiments using neighbouring plots. Biometrics 42, 231–251.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox (1964). An analysis of transformations (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B, 26, 211–252.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Choomuang, M. (1988). A method of analysis of intercropping experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Cochran, W.G. and G.M. Cox (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, C.P. (1958). The analysis of latin square designs with individual curvatures in one direction. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B, 20, 193–204.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Ezumah, H.C., W.T. Federer, and G.O. Myers (1991). Intercropping cassava with grain legumes in humid Africa. 1. Cowpea yields. BU-1108-M in the Technical Report Series of the Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  7. Federer, W.T. (1951). Evaluation of variance components from a group of experiments with multiple classifications. In Research Bulletin 380, Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College, pp. 241–310.Google Scholar
  8. Federer, W.T. (1955). Experimental Design—Theory and Application. Macmillan, New York. (Republished by Oxford and IBH Publishing, Calcutta, 1967.)Google Scholar
  9. Federer, W.T. (1961). Augmented designs with one-way elimination of heterogeneity. Biometrics 17, 447–473.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Federer, W.T. (1975). The misunderstood split plot. In Applied Statistics (R.P. Gupta, ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 9–39.Google Scholar
  11. Federer, W.T. (1976a). Sampling, blocking, and model considerations for the completely randomized, randomized complete block, and incomplete block experiment designs. Biometrische Z. 18, 511–525.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Federer, W.T. (1976b). Sampling, blocking, and model considerations for r-row by c-column designs. Biometrische Z. 18, 595–607.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Federer, W.T. (1977). Sampling, blocking, and model considerations for split plot and split block designs. Biometrical J. 19, 181–200.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Federer, W.T. (1980–81). Some recent results in experiment design with a bibliography. Internat. Statist. Rev. 48, 357–368;MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Federer, W.T. (1980–81). Some recent results in experiment design with a bibliography. Internat. Statist. Rev. 49, 95–109 and 185–197.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Federer, W.T. (1984). Principles of statistical design with special reference to experiment and treatment design. In Statistics, An Appraisal (H.A. David and H.T. David, eds.), The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
  17. Federer, W.T. (1991). Statistics and Society. Data Collection and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Federer, W.T. and L.N. Balaam (1972). Bibliography on Experiment and Treatment Design Pre-1968. Published for the International Statistical Institute by Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  19. Federer, W.T. and K.E. Basford (1991). Competing effects designs and models for two-dimensional field arrangements. Biometrics 47, 1461–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Federer, W.T., R.C. Nair, and D. Raghavarao (1975a). Some augmented row-column designs. Biometrics 31, 361–373.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Federer, W.T. and D. Raghavarao (1975b). On augmented designs. Biometrics 31, 29–35.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Federer, W.T. and B.T. Scully (1988). A parsimonious statistical design and breeding procedure for evaluating and selecting desirable characteristics over environments. BU-960-M in the Technical Report Series of the Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  23. Federer, W.T. and T.P. Speed (1987). Measures of block design efficiency recovering interblock information. Transactions, Fourth Army Conference on Applied Mathematics and Computing, ARO Report 87–1, pp. 781–786.Google Scholar
  24. Federer, W.T. and G.F. Sprague (1951). A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials: II. Error, year × variety, location × variety, and variety components. Agronomy J. 43, 535–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments (8th edn. in 1966), Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  26. Hedayat, A. and W.T. Federer (1974). Pairwise and variance balanced incomplete block designs. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 26, 331–338.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kempton, R.A. (1982). Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials. J. Agric. Sci. 98, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khare, M. and W.T. Federer (1981). A simple construction procedure for resolvable incomplete block designs for any number of treatments. Biometrical J. 23, 121–132.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns, and L.P. Lefkoviteh (1986). Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26, 894–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mead, R. (1988). The Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles for Practical Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  31. Mead, R. and J. Riley (1981). A review of statistical ideas relevant to intercropping research (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series A, 144, 462–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nair, R.C. (1976). Some contributions to the theory of nonadditivity in data analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  33. Patterson, H.D. and E.R. Williams (1976). A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs. Biometrika 63, 83–92.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preece, D.A. (1982). Balance and designs: Another terminological muddle. Utilitas Math. 21C, 85–186.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Raktoe, B.L., A. Hedayat, and W.T. Federer (1981). Factorial Designs. Wiley, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Shafiq, M. and W.T. Federer (1979). Generalized N-ary balanced block designs. Bio-metrika 66, 115–123.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, H.F. (1938). An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops. J. Agric. Sci. 28, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran (1980). Statistical Methods, 7th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  39. Verma, M.M., G.S. Chahal, and B.R. Murty (1978). Limitations of conventional regression analysis: A proposed modification. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 53, 89–91.Google Scholar
  40. Yates, F. (1933). The principles of orthogonality and confounding in replicated experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 23, 108–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yates, F. (1937). The design and analysis of factorial experiments. Imperial Bureau of Soil Science, Technical Communication 35, 1–95.Google Scholar
  42. Yates, F. and W.G. Cochran (1938). The analysis of groups of experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 28, 556–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter T. Federer
    • 1
  1. 1.Biometrics UnitCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations