Skip to main content

Performance of Recent Gravity Field Models in Precision Orbit Determination Using Doppler Observations

  • Conference paper
From Mars to Greenland: Charting Gravity With Space and Airborne Instruments

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 110))

  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

The evaluation of a geopotential model can be accomplished using several procedures which have been described in the literature. Standard methods include the estimation of precise satellite ephemerides and the recovery of the surface anomaly field and altimetric geoid. This paper provides some preliminary results using the first procedure in which satellite ephemerides are estimated from an extensive collection of Doppler observations collected by a worldwide tracking network. The motivation behind this work was to develop comparisons of performance between the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) geopotential model developed several years ago and more recent gravity models based on increased sources of satellite data and improved collections of surface anomaly data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Defense Mapping Agency Technical Report TR-8350.2 (1987). Department of Defense (DoD) World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) Technical Report, Fairfax, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J.G., et al (1988). A new gravitational model for the earth from satellite tracking data: GEM-T1, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol 93, B6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J.G. et al (1989). The GEM-T2 gravitational model, NASA Technical Memorandum 100746, Greenbelt, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J.W. (1976). CELEST computer program for computing satellite orbits, Naval Surface Warfare Center Technical Report TR-3565, Dahlgren, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, R.H. and N.K. Pavlis (1990). The development and analysis of geopotential coefficient models to spherical harmonic degree 360, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol 95, B13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapley, B.D., et al (1990). The TEG-2 gravitational model, Presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting San Francisco, CA, December 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fell, P.J., Seay, C.H. (1992). Performance of Recent Gravity Field Models in Precision Orbit Determination Using Doppler Observations. In: Colombo, O.L. (eds) From Mars to Greenland: Charting Gravity With Space and Airborne Instruments. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 110. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9255-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9255-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97857-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9255-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics