Advertisement

Performance of Recent Gravity Field Models in Precision Orbit Determination Using Doppler Observations

  • Patrick J. Fell
  • C. Harris Seay
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 110)

Abstract

The evaluation of a geopotential model can be accomplished using several procedures which have been described in the literature. Standard methods include the estimation of precise satellite ephemerides and the recovery of the surface anomaly field and altimetric geoid. This paper provides some preliminary results using the first procedure in which satellite ephemerides are estimated from an extensive collection of Doppler observations collected by a worldwide tracking network. The motivation behind this work was to develop comparisons of performance between the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) geopotential model developed several years ago and more recent gravity models based on increased sources of satellite data and improved collections of surface anomaly data.

Keywords

Gravity Model Orbit Determination Geopotential Model Orbit Difference Doppler Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Defense Mapping Agency Technical Report TR-8350.2 (1987). Department of Defense (DoD) World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) Technical Report, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
  2. Marsh, J.G., et al (1988). A new gravitational model for the earth from satellite tracking data: GEM-T1, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol 93, B6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Marsh, J.G. et al (1989). The GEM-T2 gravitational model, NASA Technical Memorandum 100746, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
  4. O’Toole, J.W. (1976). CELEST computer program for computing satellite orbits, Naval Surface Warfare Center Technical Report TR-3565, Dahlgren, VA.Google Scholar
  5. Rapp, R.H. and N.K. Pavlis (1990). The development and analysis of geopotential coefficient models to spherical harmonic degree 360, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol 95, B13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Tapley, B.D., et al (1990). The TEG-2 gravitational model, Presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting San Francisco, CA, December 3–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick J. Fell
    • 1
  • C. Harris Seay
    • 1
  1. 1.Strategic Systems DepartmentNaval Surface Warfare CenterDahlgrenUSA

Personalised recommendations