Skip to main content

The Legal Response to the New Reproductive Technologies

  • Chapter
Technology and Infertility
  • 121 Accesses

Abstract

Reproductive technology is changing the way we create families. In turn, the ways in which society, policy makers, and lawmakers view the family is changing. The explosion in reproductive technology since the birth of Louise Brown in England in 1978 has stretched the concept of procreation and the family far beyond both traditional expectations and established legal parameters. Long gone are the days of “Mom, dad, and baby makes three.” A child born today may have as many as five “parents”—a biological father and mother, a gestational mother, and a rearing father and mother.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 62 S.CT. 110 (1942). Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S., 92 S. Ct. 1029 (1972). Carey v. Population Services, Inc. 431 U.S. 678, 97 S.Ct. 2010 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. McIntyre v. Crouch, 780 P.2d 239 (1989). C.M. v. C.C., 152 NJ Supp. 160, 377 A. 2d 831 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous v. Anonymous, NY Sup.Ct., New York (01/18/91).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Welborn v. Doe, (VA Ct. Apps., 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson v. Calvert, Cal. (Orange County) Sup.Ct., docket #63-31-90 (10/22/90) Appeal Pending.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jordan v. Moschetta, et al. (pending Santa Ana, California) (4/91).

    Google Scholar 

  7. In the matter of Baby M, 109 NJ 396, 537 A.2d 1277 (N.J. 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matter of Adoption of Paul, 146 A2d 379, 550 N.Y. S. 2d815 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act, National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and American Bar Association House of Delegates (1989). Model Surrogacy Act, American Bar Association (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis v. Davis, Tenn Ct.App. (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. York v. Jones Institute of Reproductive Medicine, 717 F. Supp. 4217 (D.C. Va. 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. York v. Jones Institute of Reproductive Medicine, 717 F. Supp. 4217 (D.C. Va. 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crockin, S.L. (1993). The Legal Response to the New Reproductive Technologies. In: Seibel, M.M., Bernstein, J. (eds) Technology and Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9205-7_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9205-7_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9207-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9205-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics