Abstract
The technology that makes pregnancy possible for women with little or no ovarian function is a recent and highly successful addition to the infertility specialists’ therapeutic armamentarium. Ovum donation, perhaps more than any other advance in reproduction, creates unknown ethical, social, psychological, and legal circumstances for modern day family builders. In the narrowest sense, women who would previously have had to adopt in order to parent may now bear children who are genetically their husband’s and gestationally their own.1–5 In the largest sense, the female life cycle has been dramatically altered. Age boundaries for reproduction have been expanded beyond menopause, potentially allowing women of any age to become pregnant,6 theoretically extending reproductive potential indefinitely. Daughters and mothers may donate eggs to each other, violating natural generational barriers.7 Aunts may in fact be genetic mothers, and children raised in the same social circle may be biologically siblings with no knowledge of that relationship.8 The effects of these new connections on egg donor offspring and their families are generally unknown.9–14 This chapter will discuss the startup decisions, challenges, and problems involved in implementing an ovum donation program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Junca AM, Cohen J, et al. Anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation preliminary results. Hum Reproduct 1988; 3: 121.
Kennard EA, et al. A program for matched, anonymous oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 655.
Ben-Nun I, et al. Egg donation in an in vitro fertilization program: an alternative approach to cycle synchronization and timing of embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 683.
Asch RH, et al. Oocyte donation and gamete intrafallopian transfer in premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 263.
Rosenwaks Z. Donor eggs: their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1987; 47: 895.
Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. A preliminary report on oocyte donation extending reproductive potential to women over 40. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 1157.
Kapetanakis E, Pantos KJ. Continuation of a donor oocyte pregnancy in menopause without early pregnancy support. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 1171.
Leeton J, Harman J. The donation of oocytes to known recipients. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 27: 248.
Kirkland A, et al. An analysis of the psychological aspects of women who have delivered babies after ovum donation. Hum Reproduct 1991; 6: 224.
Mahlstedt P, Greenfield DA. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 908.
Leeton J, Harman J. Attitudes toward egg donation of thirty-four infertile women who donated during their in vitro fertilization treatment. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986; 3: 374.
Leeton J, Caro C, et al. The search for donor eggs: a problem of supply and demand. Clin Reprod Fertil 1986; 4: 337.
Schiver LR, Collin RL, et al. Long-term follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Hum Reproduct 1991; 6: 165.
Schiver LR, Rothmann S, Collins RL. Oocyte donors and semen donors: personality and motivation. Hum Reproduct 1991; 6: 164.
Navot D, et al. Hormonal manipulation of endometrial maturation. J Clin Endocrinol 20. Metab 1989; 68: 801.
Sauer MV, et al. Establishment of a non-anonymous donor oocyte program; preliminary 21. experience at the University of Southern California. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 433. 22.
Sauer MV, et al. Oocyte and pre-embryo donation to women with ovarian failure: an 23. extended clinical trial. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 39.
Leeton J, Trounson A, Wood C. The use of donor eggs and embryos in the management of 24. human infertility. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 24: 265.
Rosenwaks Z, Veeck LM, Hung-Ching L. Pregnancy following transfer of in vitro fertilized donated oocytes. Fertil Steril 1986;45:417.
Rotztejn D, et al. Results of tubal embryo transfer in premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 1990; 54 (2): 348.
Serhal PF, Craft IL. Ovum donation—a simplified approach. Fertil Steril 1987; 48:265.
Clarke AC. Profiles of the future. New York: Holt Reinhardt, 1984.
Snow CP. The two cultures with the scientific revaluation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1959.
The ethics committee of the American Fertility Society. Donor eggs in in vitro fertilization. In Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies. Fertil Steril (Suppl 2) 1990; 53: 485.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bernstein, J., Brill, M., Levin, S., Seibel, M., Steinberg, S. (1993). Implementation of Ovum Donation Technology: Start-up Decisions, Challenges, and Problems. In: Seibel, M.M., Bernstein, J. (eds) Technology and Infertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9205-7_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9205-7_31
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9207-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9205-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive