Marital Dissolution and Family Adjustment: An Attributional Analysis

  • John H. Grych
  • Frank D. Fincham

Abstract

Marital dissolution leads to a series of transitions and stressors that may continue to affect individual and family functioning for years after the formal divorce decree (Emery, 1988; Hetherington, Stanley-Hagen, & Anderson, 1989; Wallerstein, 1983).1 How families adjust to the dissolution of the marriage is affected by many factors, including financial strains, relocation, and the demands of new social roles (Emery, 1988). In addition to changes in life-style, family members face several psychological tasks during this transitional period. This chapter focuses on one such task, understanding why the marriage failed.

Keywords

Depression Kelly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. L., Walker, L. D., Schroeder, D. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1987). Attributions and attribution-behavior relations: The effect of level of cognitive development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1099–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1986). Accounts of relational dissolution: A comparison of marital and nonmarital relationships. Communication Monographs, 53, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emery, R. E. (1988). Marriage, divorce, and children’s adjustment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Fincham, F. D. (1985). Attributions in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 187–203). Orlando, FL: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Fincham, F. D., & Jaspars, J. M. F. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man-the-scientist to man-as-lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 81–138). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fletcher, G. J. O. (1983). The analysis of verbal explanations for marital separation: Implications for attribution theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu, V. R., Goodwin, M. P., Sporakowski, M. J., & Hinkle, D. E. (1987). Children’s thinking about family characteristics and parent attributes. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner, R. (1976). The parents’ book about divorce. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, J. H. (1987). Attributions in close relationships: Research and theoretical developments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 420–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey, J. H, Orbuch, T., & Weber, A. L. (1990). A social psychological model of account-making in response to severe stress. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., Galvin, K. S., Huszti, H. C., & Garnick, N. N. (1986). Attribution in the termination of close relationships: A special focus on the account. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 189–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, J. H., Wells, G. L., & Alvarez, M. D. (1978). Attribution in the context of conflict and separation in close relationships. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attributional research (Vol. 2, pp. 235–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., & Cox, R. (1982). Effects of divorce on parents and children. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.) Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (pp. 233–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Hetherington, E. M., Stanley-Hagen, M., & Anderson, E. R. (1989). Marital transitions: A child’s perspective. American Psychologist, 44, 303–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Hodges, W. F. (1986). Interventions for children of divorce. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798–1809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Lang-Gunn, L. (1988). Coping with disease, crime, and accidents: The role of self-blame attributions. In L. Y. Abramson (Ed.), Social cognition and clinical psychology (pp. 116–147). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitson, G. C., & Sussman, M. B. (1982). Marital complaints, demographic characteristics, and symptoms of mental distress in divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurdek, L. A. (1986). Children’s reasoning about parental divorce. In R. D. Ashmore & D. M. Brodzinsky (Eds.), Thinking about the family: Views of parents and children (pp. 233–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Kurdek, L. A. (1987). Children’s adjustment to parental divorce: An ecological perspective. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention, assessment, and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kurdek, L. A., & Berg, B. (1983). Correlates of children’s adjustment to their parents’ divorces. In L. A. Kurdek (Ed.), New directions in child development (pp. 47–60). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Kurdek, L. A., & Berg, B. (1987). Children’s beliefs about parental divorce scale: Psychometric characteristics and concurrent validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 712–718.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurdek, L. A., Blisk, D., & Siesky, A. E. (1981). Correlates of children’s long-term adjustment to their parents’ divorce. Developmental Psychology, 17, 565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Long, N., Slater, E., Forehand, R., & Fauber, R. (1988). Continued high or reduced interparental conflict following divorce: Relation to young adolescent adjustment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 467–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, P. H., & Aloise, P. A. (1989). Young children’s understanding of the psychological causes of behavior: A review. Child Development, 60, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neal, J. H. (1983). Children’s understanding of their parents’ divorce. In L. A. Kurdek (Ed.), New directions in child development: Vol. 19. Children and divorce (pp. 3–14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Newman, H. M., & Langer, E. J. (1981). Post-divorce adaptation and the attribution of responsibility. Sex Roles, 7, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman, H. M., & Langer, E. J. (1988). Investigating the development and course of intimate relationships. In L. Y. Abramson (Ed.), Social cognition and clinical psychology (pp. 148–173). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rholes, W. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1984). Children’s understanding of dispositional characteristics of others. Child Development, 55, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shantz, C. U. (1983). Social cognition. In J. Flavell & E. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 495–555). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Shapiro, J. P. (1989). Self-blame versus helplessness in abused children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  39. Shaw, D. S., & Emery, R. E. (1987). Parental conflict and other correlates of the adjustment of school-age children whose parents have separated. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 269–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tetlock, P. E., & Levi, A. (1982). Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wallerstein, J. S. (1983). Children of divorce: Stress and developmental tasks. In N. Garmezy & M. Rutter (Eds.), Stress, coping, and development in children (pp. 265–302). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  43. Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakesee, S. (1989). Second chances: Men, women and children a decade after divorce. New York: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
  44. Wallerstein, J., & Kelly, J. (1980). Surviving the breakup: How children and parents cope with divorce. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Warshak, R. A., & Santrock, J. W. (1983). The impact of divorce in fathercustody and mother-custody homes: The child’s perspective. In L. A. Kurdek (Ed.), New directions in child development: Vol 19. Children and divorce (pp. 29–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Weiss, R. S. (1975). Marital separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Young, D. M. (1983). Two studies of children of divorce. In L. A. Kurdek (Ed.), New directions in child development: Vol. 19. Children and divorce (pp. 61–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Grych
  • Frank D. Fincham

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations