The Language of Disengagement: A Face-Management Perspective
The language of disengagement says a great deal about the couple using it. The content of accusations, complaints, pleadings, justifications, and confessions reflect the unique relationship experiences of the partners who speak them. This does not mean, however, that the language of disengagement is without pattern. Because messages must conform to cultural, social, and linguistic constraints, commonality in their structure and function can be discerned across breakups. Moreover, variations in pattern are systematic and can be traced to the influence of antecedent and concomitant variables. In short, the messages that people produce during the very personal moments of their disengagement are amenable to investigation as sociological phenomena.
KeywordsFace Theory Face Work Negative Face Positive Tone Positive Face
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baxter, L. A. (1985). Accomplishing relationship disengagement. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 243–265). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Baxter, L. A. (1987). Cognition and communication in the relationship process. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships (pp. 192–212). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–289). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1967). On face work. In E. Goffman, Interaction ritual (pp. 5–45). Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar