Advertisement

Disruption of Marital and Cohabitation Relationships: A Social Demographic Perspective

  • James A. Sweet
  • Larry L. Bumpass

Abstract

In social demography, there is a long tradition of research on marriage, marital disruption, and remarriage. (See Sweet, 1977, for a review of this tradition.) Research in this area has accelerated greatly since the early 1970s, resulting in an immense increase in our understanding of marriage behavior. A number of factors have contributed to this growth. The growth of social welfare programs and concern for the well-being of children, particularly those growing up in single-parent families, have made family processes increasingly relevant to social policy. Scientific interest in marital processes has grown with the diffusion of the life-course perspective in social science and with the realization that marital and family experience has a profound influence on experience in other life domains. At the same time, an expansion in the amount of available data, particularly retrospective and longitudinal data on family experience, has broadened the range of issues that can be addressed empirically. Developments in analytic methodology have improved our ability to use these new data to speak more directly to important scientific and policy questions.

Keywords

Current Population Survey Russell Sage Foundation Marital Dissolution Marital Disruption Marital Stability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacon, L. (1974). Early motherhood, accelerated role transition, and social pathologies. Social Forces, 52(March), 333–341.Google Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan, T. R., Vaninadha Rao, K., Lapierre-Adamcyk, E., & Krotki, K. J. (1987). A hazard model analysis of the covariates of marriage dissolution in Canada. Demography, 24(3), 395–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, N. G., Blanc, A. K., & Bloom, D. E. (1988). Commitment and the modern union: Assessing the link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability. American Sociological Review, 53(1), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, A., & Edwards, J. N. (1985). Age at marriage and marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Booth, A., & Johnson, D. (1988). Premarital cohabitation and marital success. Journal of Family Issues, 9(2), 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bumpass, L. (1984). Children and marital disruption: A replication and update. Demography, 212, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumpass, L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Presidential address, at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America. Demography, 27, 483–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L., Castro Martin, T., & Sweet J. (1991). Background and early marital factors in marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 22–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpass, L., & Sweet, J. (1972). Differentials in marital instability. American Sociological Review, 37(6), 754–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bumpass, L., & Sweet, J. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation: Cohort levels and union stability. Demography, 26(4), 615–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bumpass, L., & Sweet, J. (1990). Children’s experience in single-parent families: Implications of cohabitation and marital transitions. Family Planning Perspectives, 21(6), 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., & Castro Martin, T. (1990). Changing patterns of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bumpass, L., Sweet, J., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 913–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burch, T. K. (1989). Common-law unions in Canada: A portrait from the 1984 family history survey. In J. Legare, T. R. Balakrishnan, & Roderic Beaujot (Eds.), The family in crisis: A population crisis? (pp. 105–120). Ottawa: Lowe-Martin.Google Scholar
  15. Caldwell, J. C., Caldwell, P., Bracher, M. D., & Santow, G. (1988). The contemporary marriage and fertility revolutions in the West. Australian Family Project Working Paper No. 3, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Carlson, E. (1986). Couples without children: Premarital cohabitation in France. In K. Davis & A. Grossbard-Schechtman (Eds.), Contemporary marriage: Comparative perspectives of a changing institution (pp. 113–130). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Castro Martin, T., & Bumpass, L. (1989). Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26(1), 37–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cherlin, A. (1981). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cherlin, A., & McCarthy, J. (1984). Demographic analysis of family and household structurey final report. Berhesda, MD: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, Center for Population Research. (Contract N01-HD-12802.)Google Scholar
  20. Chi, S. K., & Houseknecht, S. K. (1985). Protestant fundamentalism and marital success: A comparative approach. Sociology and Social Research, 69(3), 351–374.Google Scholar
  21. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187–220.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, K. (1984). Wives and work: The sex role revolution and its consequences. Population and Development Review, 10(3), 391–417.Google Scholar
  23. Espenshade, T. (1985). Marriage trends in America: Estimates, implications and underlying causes. Population and Development Review, 11(2), 193–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Festy, P. (1985). Divorce, judicial separation and remarriage. Recent trends in member states of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe Population Studies, No. 17. Strassbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  25. Frisbie, P. W. (1986). Variations in patterns of marital instability among Hispanics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glenn, N. D., & Kramer, K. B. (1987). The marriages and divorces of the children of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 811–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glenn, N., & Supancic, M. (1984). The social and demographic correlates of divorce and separation in the U.S.: An update and reconsideration. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glick, P. (1984). Marriage, divorce, and living arrangements: Prospective changes. Journal of Family Issues, March, 7–26.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, D. R. (1990). Secular individualism and divorce: The link between premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution in Canada. Unpublished paper, Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  30. Heaton, T. (1984). Religious homogamy and marital satisfaction reconsidered. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(3), 729–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henslin, J. M. (1980). Cohabitation: Its context and meaning. In J. Henslin (Ed.), Marriage and family in a changing society (pp. 223–241). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hoem, J. (1985). The impact of education on modern union formation. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography, No. 27. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  33. Hoffman, S., & Holmes, J. (1976). Husbands, wives, and divorces. In G. Duncan & J. N. Morgan (Eds.), Five thousand American families: Patterns of economic progress (Vol. 4, pp. 23–76).Google Scholar
  34. Khoo, S. (1987). Living together: Young couples in de facto relationships. Australian Institute of Family Studies Working Paper No. 10, Development Studies Centre, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  35. Kiernan, K. E. (1986). Teenage marriage and marital breakdown. Population Studies, 40, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leridon, H. (1990). Cohabitation, marriage, separation: An analysis of life histories of French cohorts from 1968 to 1985. Population Studies, 44, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leridon, H., & Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1989). The new couples: Number, characteristics, and attitudes. Population, 44, 203–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Population and Development Review, 9, 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lesthaeghe, R., & Wilson, C. (1985). Modes of production, secularization, and the pace of the fertility decline in Western Europe, 1870–1930. In A. Coale & S. Watkins (Eds.), The decline of fertility in Europe (pp. 261–292). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1989). Modelling divorce with the panel study of income dynamics. Final Report to the Social Security Administration. (Grant No. 10-P-98299-0-01.) Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.Google Scholar
  42. Lye, D. N. (1989). Shifting family values and the rise of divorce in developed countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  43. McCarthy, J. (1978). A comparison of the probability of the dissolution of first and second marriages. Demography, 15, 345–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCarthy, J. (1979). Religious commitment, affiliation and marriage dissolution. In R. Withnow (Ed.), The religious dimension: New directions in quantitative research (pp. 179–197). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. McLanahan, S., & Bumpass, L. (1988). Intergenerational consequences of family disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 130–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menken, J., Trussell, J., Stempel, D., & Babakol, O. (1981). Proportional hazards life table models: An illustrative analysis of socio-demographic influences on marriage dissolution in the United States. Demography, 18, 181–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Michael, R. T. (1978). The rise in divorce rates, 1960–1974: Age-specific components. Demography, 15(2), 177–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morgan, S. P., & Rindfuss, R. R. (1985). Marital disruption: Structural and temporal dimensions. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mott F., & Moore, S. F. (1979). The causes of marital disruption among young American women: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moynihan, D. P. (1967). The Negro family: The case for national action. In L. Rainwater & W. L. Yancey, The Moynihan report and the politics of controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. National Center for Health Statistics. (1973). 100 years of marriage and divorce statistics: United States, 1867–1967 (Series 21, No. 24). U.S. Department of Health, Education, & Welfare, Vital and Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  52. National Center for Health Statistics. (1978). Divorces and divorce rates: United States (Series 21, No. 29).Google Scholar
  53. Ogburn, W. F., & Tibbitts, C. (1933). The family and its functions. In President’s Research Committee on Social Trends, Recent social trends (pp. 661–708). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Preston, S. H., & McDonald, J. (1979). The incidence of divorce within cohorts of American marriages contracted since the Civil War. Demography, 16, 1–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rindfuss, R., & Sweet, J. A. (1977). Postwar fertility trends and differentials in the United States. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Schoen, R. (1988). Practical uses of multistate population models. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 341–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schoen, R., & Owens, D. (1990) A further look at first unions and first marriages. Paper presented at the conference on demographic perspectives on the American Family: Patterns and prospects, Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Albany.Google Scholar
  58. Schoen, R., & Nelson, V. E. (1974). Marriage divorce, and mortality: A life table analysis. Demography, 11(2), 267–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schoen, R., Urton, W., Woodrow, K., & Baj, J. (1985). Marriage and divorce in 20th century American cohorts. Demography, 22(1), 101–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spanier, G. (1983). Married and unmarried cohabitation in the United States: 1980. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sweet, J. A. (1977). Demography and the family. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 363–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sweet, J. A. (1978). Indicators of family and household structure of racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. In The demography of racial and ethnic groups, F. Bean & P. Frisbie (Eds.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sweet, J. A. (1989). Differentials in the approval of cohabitation. NSFH Working Paper No. 8, National Survey of Families and Households, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  64. Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. (1974). Differentials in marital instability of the black population: 1970. Phylon, 35(3), 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. (1987). American families and households. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  66. Sweet, J., & Bumpass, L. (1990a). Religious differentials in marriage behavior and attitudes. NSFH Working Paper No. 15, National Survey of Families and Households, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  67. Sweet J., & Bumpass, L. (1990b). Young Adults’ Views of Marriage, Cohabitation, and Family. Paper presented at the conference on demographic perspectives on the American family: Patterns and prospects, sponsored by the Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Albany.Google Scholar
  68. Sweet, J., Bumpass, L., & Call, V. (1988). The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households. NSFH 1, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  69. Tanfer, K. (1987). Patterns of premarital cohabitation among never-married women in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Teachman, J. D. (1982). Methodological issues in the analysis of family formation and dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 613–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Teachman, J. D. (1983). Early marriage, premarital fertility and marital dissolution. Results for blacks and whites. Journal of Family Issues, 4(1), 105–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomson, E., & Colella, U. (1990). Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment? NSFH Working Paper No. 23, National Survey of Families and Households, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  73. Thornton, A. (1988). Cohabitation and marriage in the 1980s. Demography, 25(4), 497–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thornton, A., & Rogers, W. (1987). The influence of individual and historical time on marital dissolution. Demography, 24, 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1989). Marital status and living arrangements: March 1988 (Series P-20, No. 433). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  76. Weed, J. A. (1980). National estimates of marriage dissolution and survivorship. Vital and Health Statistics (Series 3, No. 19 IV) (DHHS Publication No. PHS 81–1403). Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  77. Westoff, C., & Ryder, N. (1977). The contraception revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  78. White, L., & Booth, A. (1985). The quality and stability of remarriages: The role of stepchildren. American Sociological Review, 50, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wiersma, G. E. (1983). Cohabitation, an alternative to marriage? A cross-national study. Publications of the Netherlands Interuniversity Demographic Institute and the Population and Family Study Centre (Vol. 9). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Willis, R. J., & Michael, R. T. (1988). Innovation in family formation: Evidence on cohabitation in the U.S. Paper presented at IUSSP Seminar on the Family, the Market and the state in aging societies, Sendai City, Japan.Google Scholar
  81. Wu, L. L., & Tuma, N. B. (1990). Local hazard models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 141–180). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Sweet
  • Larry L. Bumpass

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations