Advertisement

The Account-Making Process: A Phenomenological Approach

  • Ann L. Weber

Abstract

Participants in a summer Elderhostel course on grief were invited to complete open-ended questionnaires about their personal experiences in responding to the loss of an important close relationship.

Keywords

Personal Relationship Phenomenological Approach Account Research Phenomenological Perspective Life Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duck, S. W., & Sants, H. K. A. (1983). On the origin of the specious: Are personal relationships really interpersonal states? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Edwards, D., & Middleton, D. (1988). Conversational remembering and family relationships: How children learn to remember. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gurwitsch, A. (1966). Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evans ton, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Harvey, J. H., Agostinelli, G., & Weber, A. L. (1989). Account-making and the formation of expectations about close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 10. Close relationships (pp. 39–62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey, J. H., Flanary, R., & Morgan, M. (1986). Vivid memories of vivid loves gone by. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3(3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harvey, J. H., Orbuch, T. L., & Weber, A. L. (1990). A social-psychological model of account-making in response to severe stress. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(3), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harvey, J. H., & Weber, A. L. (1982, July). Attribution in the termination of close relationships: A special focus on the account. Paper presented at the international conference on personal relationships, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., Galvin, K. S., Huszti, H. C., & Garnick, N. N. (1986). Attribution in the termination of close relationships: A special focus on the account. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 189–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., & Orbuch, T. L. (1990). Interpersonal accounts: A social psychological perspective. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., Yarkin, K. L., & Stewart, B. E. (1982). An attributional approach to relationship breakdown and dissolution. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 107–126). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hekman, S. J. (1983). Weber, the ideal type, and contemporary social theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, C., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). The end of 103 affairs. In G. Levinger & O. C. Moles (Eds.), Separation and divorce. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Horowitz, M. J. (1986). Stress response syndromes (2nd ed.). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  14. Kaufman, S. R. (1986). The ageless self: Sources of meaning in late life. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  15. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Sense and nonsense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Milgram, S. (1977). The individual in a social world. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  20. Misiak, H., & Sexton, V. (1973). Phenomenological, existential, and humanistic psychologies. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  21. Neimeyer, G. J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1985). Relational trajectories: A personal construct contribution. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 2(3), 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers, M. F. (1983). Sociology, ethnomethodology, and experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, J. (1986). The thinking self. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt, J. (1985). Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Between phenomenology and structuralism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Spurling, L. (1977). Phenomenology and the social world. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Sternberg, R. (1988). The triangle of love. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Tennov, D. (1979). Love and limerence. New York: Stein & Day.Google Scholar
  29. Weber, A. L., Harvey, J. H, & Stanley, M. A. (1987). The nature and motivations of accounts for failed relationships. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation and knowledge (pp. 114–133). London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann L. Weber

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations