Advertisement

Cognitive—Behavioral Approaches in Reading and Written Language: Developing Self-Regulated Learners

  • Karen R. Harris
  • Steve Graham
  • Michael Pressley
Part of the Disorders of Human Learning, Behavior, and Communication book series (HUMAN LEARNING)

Abstract

The movement toward cognitive—behavioral educational interventions for children with significant academic problems has been the result of multiple forces. Although space precludes a thorough history, it is appropriate to acknowledge major impetuses here (see Harris, 1982, Mahoney, 1977, and Meyers, Cohen, & Schleser, 1989 for more detailed histories). Dissatisfaction with traditional behavioral interventions and their underlying assumptions became evident across many fields in the 1960s, including that of learning disabilities. While many important behavioral interventions were identified for special needs children, dissatisfaction arose in part from the limited scope and effectiveness of behavioral interventions that focused on discrete procedures used to change restricted behaviors, and in part from frequent failure to obtain durable and generalizable results (Harris, 1982). From the radical behavioral viewpoint, cognitions had no place in the science of behavior, and the underlying assumption was “the best way to change thoughts and feelings is to change behavior directly; changes in thoughts and feelings will then follow” (Ledwidge, 1978, p. 371). Most cognitivists in turn focused on cognition as the focal point for change and rejected behavioral learning principles in the 1960s.

Keywords

Reading Comprehension Strategy Instruction Poor Reader Learn Disability American Educational Research Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, P., & Judy, J. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performances. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. C. Anderson, D. S. Ogle, and E. G. Carr (Eds.), Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas (pp. 73–91 ). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291 ). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text strcture/ summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 311–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Au, K. (1980). Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11, 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Baumann, J. E. (1984). The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297–306.Google Scholar
  10. Bednarczyk, A. M., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Story grammar instruction for learning disabled students with comprehension problems. Unpublished raw data. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Department of Special Education.Google Scholar
  11. Belmont J. M., & Butterfield, E. C. (1977). The instructional approach to developmental cognitive research. In R. V. Kail, Jr., & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 437–482 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Benson, A. J., & Presbury, J. H. (1989). The cognitive tradition in schools. In J. N. Hughes & R. J. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 37–61 ). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–64 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Bommarito, J., & Meichenbaum, D. (1978). Enhancing reading comprehension by means of self-instructional training. Unpublished manuscript. Waterloo ON Canada: University of Waterloo, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  15. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E. A., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self- regulated strategy use: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B. F. Jones (Ed.), Dimensions of thinking: Review of research (pp. 53–92 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, A. L. (1988). Motivation to learn and understand: On taking charge of one’s own learning. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 311–321.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markamn (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. Ill, Cognitive development (pp. 177–266 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, A. L., & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to treansfer: Learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493– 523.Google Scholar
  21. Cariglia-Bull, T., & Pressley, M. (1990). Short-term memory differences between children predict imagery effects when sentences are read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 384–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 256–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deshler, D. D. ( 1989, April). The development of the Kansas Learning Strategies Curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  24. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.Google Scholar
  25. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 391–411 ). Washington, DC: NASP.Google Scholar
  26. Elliott-Faust, D. J., & Pressley, M. (1986). How to teach comparison processing to increase children’s short- and long-term comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 27– 33.Google Scholar
  27. Ellis, E. S., Lenz, B. K., & Sabornie, E. J. (1987a). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 1, Critical agents. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (1), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellis, E. S., Lenz, B. K., & Sabornie, E. J. (1987b). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 2, Research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (2), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Englert, C. S., & Raphael, T. (in press). Developing successful writers through cognitive strategy instruction. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching. Greenwich, CT: J AT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T., Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Fear, K., & Gregg, S. (1988). A case for writing intervention: Strategies for writing informational text. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 98–113.Google Scholar
  31. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling contraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Gambrell, L. B., & Bales, R. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension- monitoring performance of fourth- and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.Google Scholar
  34. Garner, R., Hare, V. C, Alexander, P., Haynes, J., & Winograd, P. (1984). Inducing use of a text lookback strategy among unsuccessful readers. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 789–798.Google Scholar
  35. Garner, R., Macready, G. B., & Wagoner, S. (1984). Readers acquisition of the components of the text-lookback strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graham, S. (1982). Composition research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 14, 1–16.Google Scholar
  37. Graham, S. (April, 1989 ). The role of production factors in learning disabled students compositions. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  38. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1987). Improving composition skills of inefficient learners with self-instructional strategy training. Topics in Language Disorders, 7, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1988). Instructional recommendations for teaching writing to exceptional students. Exceptional Children, 54, 506–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989a). A components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.Google Scholar
  41. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989b). Cognitive training: Implications for written language. In J. Hughes & R. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook, (pp. 247–279 ). New York: Guilford Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  42. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989c). Improving learning disabled students skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training. Exceptional Children, 54, 201–214.Google Scholar
  43. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (in press). Cognitive strategy instruction in written language for learning disabled students. In S. Vogel & B. Levinson (Eds.), Effective intervention for the learning disabled. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  44. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Mac Arthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Sawyer, R. (1987). Composition instruction with learning disabled students: Self-instructional strategy training. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
  46. Graham, S., & Mac Arthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self-instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education, 22, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., & Voth, T. ( 1989, April). Improving LD students compositions using a strategy involving product and process goal- setting. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  48. Graves, A., Montague, M., & Wong, Y. ( 1989, April). The effects of procedural facilitation on story composition of learning disabled students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  49. Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. W., Kauffman, J. M., & Loper, A. (1983). Academic problems. In R. J. Morris & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Practice of child therapy: A textbook of methods (pp. 113–141 ). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of fourth-grade good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–16.Google Scholar
  52. Harris, K. R. (1985). Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues in cognitive behavioral assessment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 373–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harris, K. R. (1986). The effects of cognitive-behavior modification on private speech and task performance during problem solving among learning disabled and normally achieving children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 63–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harris, K. R. (April, 1988 ). What’s wrong with strategy intervention research: Intervention integrity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  55. Harris, K. R. (March, 1989 ). The role of self-efficacy in self-instructional strategy training and the development of self-regulated learning among children with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  56. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled studentscomposition skills: Self-control strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1988). Self-instructional strategy training: Improving writing skills among educationally handicapped students. Teaching Exceptional Students, 20, 35–37.Google Scholar
  58. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (in press). Strategy instruction in written language: An integrational model. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & S. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy: Cognitive research and instruction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Harris, K. R., Preller, D., & Graham, S. (1990). Acceptability of cognitive- behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Harris, K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–405.Google Scholar
  61. Hobbs, S. A., Moguin, L. E., Tyroler, M., & Lahey, B. B. (1980). Cognitive behavior therapy with children: Has clinical utility been demonstrated? Psychological Bulletin, 87, 147–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hughes, J. N., & Hall, R. J. (Eds.) (1989). Cognitive-behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196–205.Google Scholar
  64. Idol, L., & Groll, V. J. (1987). Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 214–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J., Stein, M. L., & Haynes, M. (1987). Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. Exceptional Children, 54, 54–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kendall, P. C., & Braswell, L. (1982). On cognitive-behavioral assessment: Model, measures, and madness. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 35–82 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ledwidege, B. (1978). Cognitive behavior modification: A step in the wrong direction? Psychological Bulletin, 85, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., & Vye, N. J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching improves standardized reading comprehension performance in poor grade- school comprehenders. Elementary School Journal, 90, 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. MacArthur, C. (1988). A process approach to writing instruction. College Park, MD: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth.Google Scholar
  71. Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Reflections on the cognitive learning trend in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 32, 5–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643–655.Google Scholar
  73. Manzo, A. V. (1969). The ReQuest procedure. Journal of Reading, 2, 123–126.Google Scholar
  74. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  75. Meichenbaum, D. H., & Asarnow, J. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research and procedures (pp, 11–35 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  76. Meichenbaum, D., & Gilmore, J. B. (1984). The nature of unconscious processes: A cognitive-behavioral perspective. In K. Bowers & D. Meichenbaum (Eds.), The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 273–298 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Meyers, A. W., Cohen, R., & Schleser, R. (1989). A cognitive-behavioral approach to education: Adopting a broad-based perspective. In J. Hughes & R. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 62–86 ). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  78. Moran, M., Schumaker, J., & Vetter, A. (1981). Teaching a paragraph organization strategy to learning disabled adolescents (Research Report No. 54 ). Lawrence: University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  79. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287.Google Scholar
  80. O’Sullivan, J. T., & Pressley, M. (1984). Completeness of instruction and strategy transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21 (1 & 2), 73–98.Google Scholar
  82. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension—Fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pearl, R. (1985). Cognitive behavioral interventions for increasing motivation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 443–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Poplin, M. S. (1988). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, (7), 389–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pressley, G. M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children’s learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research, 47, 586–622.Google Scholar
  87. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867.Google Scholar
  88. Pressley, M., & Dennis-Rounds, J. R. (1980). Transfer of a mnemonic keyword strategy at two age levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D. L., & Elliott-Faust, D. J. (1988). What is strategy instructional enrichment and how to study it: Illustrations from research on children’s prose memory. In F. Weinert & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Memory development: Universal changes and individual development (pp. 101– 131 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  90. Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D., Elliott-Faust, D. L., & Miller, G. E. (1985). Children’s use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can’t be taught. In M. Pressley & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 1–47 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  91. Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1986). Elaboration learning strategies for the inefficient learner. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 175–211 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  92. Pressley, M., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1989). Memory strategy instruction in learning disabilities: Present and future directions for researchers. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 68–77.Google Scholar
  93. Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., Lysynchuk, L. M., Martin, V., Wood, E., & Willoughby, T. (1990). A primer of research on cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Raphael, T. E., & McKinney, J. (1983). An examination of fifth- and eighth- grade children’s question-answering behavior: An instructional study in metacognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 67–86.Google Scholar
  95. Raphael, T. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1985). Increasing students awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217–236.Google Scholar
  96. Raphael, T. E., & Wonnacott, C. A. (1985). Metacognitive training in question- answering strategies: Implementation in a fourth-grade developmental reading program. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 282–296.Google Scholar
  97. Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1985). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1991). Theoretically based effects of strategy instruction components on learning disabled students acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of composition skills and self-efficacy. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  99. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic and remedial capabilities in children’s composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67–95 ). London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  100. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self- regulation in children’s knowledge processing. In S. Chiman, J. Segal, ? R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Current research and open questsions (Vol. 2, pp. 563–577 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  101. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching ( 3rd ed., pp. 778–803 ). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  102. Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., Alley, G., Warner, M., Clark, F., & Nolan, S. (1982). Error monitoring: A learning strategy for improving adolescent performance. In W. M. Cruickshank & J. Lerner (Eds.), Best of ACLD (Vol. 3, pp. 170–183 ). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., Alley, J. R., & Warner, M. M. (1983). Toward the development of an intervention model for learning disabled adolescents: The University of Kansas Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 45–74.Google Scholar
  104. Schumaker, J., & Sheldon, J. (1985). The sentence writing strategy. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  105. Short, E. J., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 225–235.Google Scholar
  106. Siegel, I. E. (1982). The relationship between parental distancing strategies and the child’s cognitive behavior. In L. M. Laosa & I. E. Siegel (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children (pp. 47–86 ). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  107. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). an analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  108. Symons, S., Snyder, B. L., Cariglia-Bull, T., & Pressley, M. (1989). Why be optimistic about cognitive strategy instruction? In C. B. McCormick, G. E. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 3–32 ). New York and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  109. Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children’s comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tharp, R. G. (1982). The effective instruction of compehension: Results and description of the Kamehameha Early Education Program. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 503–527.Google Scholar
  112. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  113. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  115. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Gresham, F. M. (1988). Handbook of behavior therapy in education. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wong, B. Y. L. (Ed.) (1982). Metacognition and learning disabilities [Special issue]. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1).Google Scholar
  117. Wong, B. Y. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1991). Academic applications of cognitive-behavioral programs with learning disabled students. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures (pp. 245– 275 ). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  118. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wood, E. J., Pressley, M., & Winne, P. (1990). Elaborative interrogation effects on children’s learning of factual content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zivin, G. (Ed.) (1979). The development of self-regulation through private speech. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen R. Harris
  • Steve Graham
  • Michael Pressley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations