# Stress in Dilute Suspensions

• Stephen L. Passman
Conference paper
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications book series (IMA, volume 26)

## Abstract

Generally, two types of theory are used to describe the field equations for suspensions. The so-called “postulated” equations are based on the kinetic theory of mixtures, which logically ought to give reasonable equations for solutions. The basis for the use of such theory for suspensions is tenuous, though it at least gives a logical path for mathematical arguments. It has the disadvantage that it leads to a system of equations which is underdetermined, in a sense that can be made precise. On the other hand, the so-called “averaging” theory starts with a determined system, but the very process of averaging renders the resulting system underdetermined. I suggest yet a third type of theory. Here, the kinetic theory of gases is used to motivate continuum equations for the suspended particles. This entails an interpretation of the stress in the particles that is different from the usual one. Classical theory is used to describe the motion of the suspending medium. The result is a determined system for a dilute suspension. Extension of the theory to more concentrated systems is discussed.

## Keywords

Kinetic Theory Multiphase Flow Continuum Theory Average Theory Determined System
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## References

1. [1]
C. Truesdell and R.G. Muncaster, Fundamentals of Maxwell’s Kinetic Theory of a Simple Monotomic Gas, Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
2. [2]
W.G. Vincenti and C.H. Kruger, Jr., Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics, Wiley, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
3. [3]
Stephen L. Passman, Jace W. Nunziato and Edward K. Walsh, A Theory of Multiphase Mixtures, in Appendix 5C of Rational Thermodynamics, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
4. [4]
Ray M. Bowen, Theory of Mixtures, in Continuum Physics, Vol. III, edited by A.C. Eringen, Academic Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
5. [5]
David F. Migue, Richard C. Givler and Jace W. Nunziato, Rheological effects of nonuniform particle distributions in dilute suspensions, Journal of Rheology, 30, 5 (1986), pp. 1053–1076.
6. [6]
Stephen L. Passman, Forces on the Solid Constituent in a Multiphase Flow, Journal of Rheology, 30, 5 (1986), pp. 1077–1083.
7. [7]
J. D. Ramshaw and J. A. Trapp, Characteristics, stability, and short wavelength phenomena in two-phase flow equation systems, Nuclear Science and Engineering 66 (1978), pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
8. [8]
C. Pauchon and S. Bannerjee, Interphase momentum interaction effects in the averaged multifield model, Part I: Void propagation in bubbly flows, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 12 (1986), pp. 555–573.
9. [9]
C.J.S. Petrie, Elongational Flows, Pitman, London, 1979.
10. [10]
C. Truesdell and W. Noll, Non-Linear Field Theories of Mechanics, Handbuch der Physik III/3, Springer-Verlag, 1965. A modern discussion is given in P. Podio-Guidugli and M. Gurtin, The Thermodynamics of Constrained Materials, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 51, (1973), pp. 192–208.
11. [11]
C. Truesdell, A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics, Volume 1, Academic Press, New York, 1977.
12. [12]
J.O. Hirschfelder, C. F. Curtiss and R. Byron Bird, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, Wiley, 1954.
13. [13]
J. C. Maxwell, On the Dynamical Theory of Gases, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 157 (1867), pp. 49–88.
14. [14]
C. Truesdell, Sulle Basi di Termomeccanica, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Mathematiche e Naturali, Series 8, 22 (1957), pp. 33–38, 158–166; (An English translation by the author appears as On the Foundations of Mechanics and Energetics, Continuum Mechanics II, Gordon & Breach, New York, 1965, 292–305.Google Scholar

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

## Authors and Affiliations

• Stephen L. Passman
• 1
• 2
1. 1.Pittsburgh Energy Technology CenterPittsburghUSA
2. 2.Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA