Advertisement

An Optical Rangefinder for Autonomous Robot Cart Navigation

  • Gabriel L. Miller
  • Eric R. Wagner

Abstract

A simple, low cost, infra-red rangefinder has been developed for investigation of autonomous robot cart navigation in factories and similar environments. A 2mW 0.82μ LED source (not a laser) is 100% amplitude modulated at 5MHz and used to form a collimated 1″ diameter transmit beam that is unconditionally eye-safe. Returning scattered radiation is focussed by a 4″ diameter coaxial Fresnel lens onto a p-i-n silicon photodiode. Range is determined from the phase shift between the 5MHz modulation on the transmitted and received signals. Use of a rotating mirror provides 360° polar coordinate coverage of both distance and reflectance out to ∿20 ft. around the vehicle. Both radial and angular resolution correspond to ∿1 inch at a ranging distance of 5 ft., with an overall bandwidth of ∿lKHz. The ranging resolution at 20 ft. is ∿2.5 inches, which is close to the theoretical limit possible for the radiated power, bandwidth, optics and receiver employed. The system is capable of reading wall bar codes “on the fly” and is in addition capable of simultaneously ranging and acting as a wideband optical communication receiver. Total parts cost for the optical transmitter, Fresnel lens, receiver and all the electronics is <$200. The remaining major parts, consisting of the rotating mirror, ring mounting, motor and incremental encoder, cost <$500.

Keywords

Automatic Gain Control Automate Guide Vehicle Optical Ranger Fresnel Lens Automate Guide Vehicle System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automated Guided Vehicle Systems, Stuttgart, W. Germany 7–9 June 1983. Ed. Prof. Dr. Ing. H. J. Warnecke. North Holland Publishing Co. 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Tsumura, Proceedings of the 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, USA, April 7–10, 1986, Vol. II, p. 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. P. Moravec and A. Elfes, 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, March 25–28, 1986, p. 116.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Elfes, Proceedings of the 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, USA, April 7–10, 1986, Vol. II, p. 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Holland, L. Rossol, M. Ward, “Computer Vision and Sensor Based Robots”, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. S. Albus, E. Kent, M. Nashman, P. Mansbach, L. Palombo and M. Shneier, Proceedings of the SPIE Technical Symposium, Crystal City, VA, May 1982, p. 142.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Le Moigne and A. M. Waxman, Proceedings of the Seventh CIPPRS/IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Montreal, Canada, July 30 - August 2, 1984, p. 203.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. C. Morgan, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Robot Vision and Sensory Control, ROVISEC 3, Cambridge, MA, USA, November 1983, p. 615.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Hongo, H. Arakawa, G. Sugimoto, K. Tange and Y. Yamamoto, Proceedings of the IEEE/SICE International Conference on Industrial Electronics and Control Instrumentation IECON ′85, San Francisco, CA, USA, November 18–22, 1985, p. 535.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Ahola and R. Myllyla, Proceedings of the IEEE/SICE International Conference on Industrial Electronics and Control Instrumentation IECON ′84, Tokyo, Japan, October 22–26, 1984, p. 812.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Nitzan, A. E. Brain and R. O. Duda, Proceedings of IEEE, Vol. 65 (1977), p. 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Information supplied by the ERIM organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AT&T 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel L. Miller
    • 1
  • Eric R. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.AT&T Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA

Personalised recommendations