Skip to main content

The Development of a New Measuring Instrument

  • Chapter
Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care

Part of the book series: Frontiers of Primary Care ((PRIMARY))

  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to examine the measurement of patient functioning as an assessment problem. This will be accomplished by comparing this domain with a number of others, and outlining some of the features of patient functioning that mark it as unique. Such a comparative approach will render visible some of the basic issues, that confront any attempt to proceed with the measurement of patient functioning. So, too, does comparison with developments in other domains point to several methodological approaches that might be appropriate should WONCA decide to begin the process of measure development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shannon C, Weaver W: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC: Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cronbach LJ: Essentials of Psychological Testing, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA, Harper & Row, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schipper H, Levitt M: Measuring quality of life: Risks and benefits. Cancer Treat Reps. 69 (10): 1115–1123, 1985.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson EC, Landgraf, JM, Hays RD, Wasson JH, Kirk JW: The COOP function charts: A system to measure patient functioning in physicians’ offices. Paper presented at symposium on the measurement of patient functioning sponsored by the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (WONCA); Calgary, Alberta, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonica JJ, Ventafridda, V (eds): Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, Vol 3, New York, Raven Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gracely RH, Dubner R: Reliability and validity of verbal descriptor scales of painfulness. Pain 29: 175–185, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergner M: Measurement of health status. Med Care 23 (5): 696–709, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE: Monitoring and evaluating health services. Med Care 23 (5): 705–709, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ware JE: Conceptualizing disease impact and treatment outcomes. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation (unpublished manuscript, 1983 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elford RW, Connis RT, Taylor TR et al: A clinical measure for evaluating patient functioning in diabetes. Draft Manuscript dated May. Also read as a paper at symposium on the measurement of patient functioning sponsored by the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (WONCA); Calgary, Alberta, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jette AM, Davies AR, Clearly PD, et al: General Int Med, 1: 143–149, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, et al: The Sickness Impact Profile: Development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health, 65 (12): 1304–1310, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. West R: Results of the Auckland Health Status Survey. Paper presented at symposium on the measurement of patient functioning sponsored by the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (WONCA); Calgary, Alberta, October 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anastasi A: Psychological Testing, 6th ed. New York, MacMillan, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Psychological Association: Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychol Bull 51: 201–238, 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE: Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52: 281–302, 1955.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Messick S: Constructs and their vicissitudes in educational and psychological measurement. Psychol Bull 89: 575–588, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mischel W: Personality and Assessment. New York, Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watson G: Personality and character measurement. Rev Educ Res 8: 269–291, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kornhauser A: Replies of psychologists to a short questionnaire on mental test development, personality, and the Rorschach test. Educ Psychol Meas 5: 3–15, 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meehl PE: The dynamics of “structured” personality tests. J Clin Psychol 1: 296–303, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hathaway SR, McKinley JC: The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, ed rev. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson DN, Messick S: Response styles on the MMPI: Comparison of clinical and normal samples. J Abnor Social Psychol 65: 285–299, 1962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Block J: The Challenge of Response Sets. New York, Appleton-Century Crofts, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen RJ, Montague P, Nathanson LS, Swerdlik ME: Psychological Testing: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cattell RB, Eber HW, Tatsuoka MM: Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eysenck HJ: Dimensions of Personality. London, Kegan Paul, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cliff N: The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychol Bull 103: 276–279, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guertin WH, Bailey JP: Introduction to Modern Factor Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI, Edwards Brother, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jackson DN: Personality Research Form Manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jackson DN: A sequential system for personality scale development, In CD Speilberger (ed): Current Topics in Clinical and Community Psychology, Orlando FL: Academic Press, 1970, Vol. 2, pp. 61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jackson DN: The dynamics of structured personality tests. Psychol Rev 78: 229–248, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toelken B: The Dynamics of Folklore. Boston, MA: Houthton-Mifflin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am J Psychol 15, 72–101, 1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuder GF, Richardson MW: The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika 2: 151–160, 1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297–334, 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bennett GK, Seashore HG, Wesman A: Differential Aptitude Tests: Technical Supplement. Cleveland, OH, Psychological Corporation, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Anastasi A: Evolving concepts of test validation. Ann Rev Psychol 37: 1–15, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Applegate WB: Uses of assessment instruments in clinical settings. J Am Geriatri Soc 35: 45–50, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, T.B. (1990). The Development of a New Measuring Instrument. In: Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97198-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8977-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics