Studies Using the Nottingham Health Profile in General Practice

Part of the Frontiers of Primary Care book series (PRIMARY)


Patients present complaints or problems to the (family) doctor. After assessing the problem the doctor intervenes. Usually, the patient is sent on his way and will only come back for the same problem in the case of insufficient response to his treatment. This is particularly true for an acute, less serious illness such those that are predominantly treated in primary care. The monitoring of outcome is mainly implicit and rests with the patient. If he is satisfied with the final result, he does not return to the practice. Medical follow-up is by and large restricted to cases in which there is a discrepancy between expected and experienced outcome.


Family Physician Health Profile Nottingham Health Profile Illness Episode Childhood Morbidity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization, In Basic Documents. Geneva, World Health Organization, p. 2, 1948.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP: Measuring health status: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 35: 185–188, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McEwen J: Manual: The Nottingham Health Profile. London, Academic Department of Community Medicine, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eyk JTM, Smits AJA, Meyboom W, Mokkink H, Son J van: The Nottingham Health Profile in the Dutch situation. Allgemeinmedizin (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weel C van, Thissen E, Kock Th, Klaassen J, Felix W, Gooskens P, Wosten P: Preventive care for the elderly. Allgemeinmedizin 18: 70–73, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoogen HJM, Huygen FJA, Schellekens JWG, Straat J, Velden HGM van der: Morbidity Figures from General Practice. Department of Family Medicine, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katz S, Branch LG, Banson MH, Papsidero JA, Beck JC, Greer DS: Active life expectancy. N Engl J Med 309: 1218–1224, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams EL: Scope for intervention following case identification, In Taylor RC, Buckley EG, (eds): Preventive Care for the Elderly. Occasional Paper 35, London, Royal College of General Practitioners, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weel C van, Bosch WJHM van den, Hoogen HJM van den, Smits AJA: Development of respiratory illness in childhood—a longitudial study in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 37: 404–408, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huygen FJA: Family Medicine, the Medical Life History of Families. Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Dekker en van der Vegt, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    College of General Practitioners: A classification of disease. J R Coll Gen Pract 2: 140–159, 1959.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kind P, Carr-Hill R: The Nottingham Health profile: A useful tool for epidemio logists? Soc Sci Med 25: 905–910, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huygen FJA: Longitudinal studies of family units. J R Coll Gen Pract. 38: 170, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lamberts H: Problem behavior in primary health care. J R Coll Gen Pract 29: 331–335, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations