Abstract
The AMP-scoring system was developed as part of a project for the production of an integrated computerized medical record for general practice (1). Its purpose is the assessment of functional status, primarily in the elderly, who are defined as persons aged 75 years and over. The assessment of functional status is particularly important in the elderly. Diagnostic assessments and decisions about therapeutic interventions require at least a possibility for improvements in health. The knowledge of functional status as a measurement of health is very important.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
References
Heyrman J, Dessers L: Development of instruments for computerization of an integrated medical record for general practice. NFWO-grant 3/9005/87/N.
Holst OR: Content Analysis. In: Lindzey G and Aroson E. The Handbook of Social Psychology. London: Addison-Wesley; 1968:601.
De Munter B: The General Practitioner and the Elderly in Primary Care, an Explorative Study on the Registration Behavior of 14 GP’s. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven; 1988. Thesis.
Antonovsky A: Health, Stress, and Coping: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical Well-Being. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Antonovsky A: Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP: Stressful Life Events: Their Nature and Effects. New York, Wiley 1974.
Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS (eds): Stressful Life Events and Their Contexts. Series in Psychological Epidemiology, Nr. 2, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1981.
Fisher S, Reason J (eds): Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health. New York, Wiley, 1988.
Kaplan HB (ed): Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research. New York, Academic Press, 1983.
Coelho GV, Hamburg DA, Adams JE: Coping Adaptation. New York, Basic Books, 1974.
Cohen F, Lazarus RS: Coping with the Stress of illness, in Stone GC, Cohen, F, Adler NE (eds): Health Psychology: A Handbook. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Pearlin L, Schooler C: The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 19: 2–21, 1978.
Ursin H: Activation, coping, and psychosomatics, in Ursin H, Baade E, Levine S (eds): Psychobiology of Stress: A Study of Coping Men. New York, Academic Press, 1978.
Cassel J: The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. Am J Epidemiol 104: 107–123, 1976.
McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA, Patterson JM, Cauble AE, Wilson LR, Warwick W: Coping health inventory for patients: an assessment of parential coping patterns in the care of the chronically III child. J Marriage and the Fam 45: 359–371, 1983.
McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA: Family stress theory and assessment: The T-double ABCX model of family adjustment and adaptation, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, pp. 3–34, 1987.
McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, Pirner P: Family Rituals Typologies and Family Strengths. Family Stress Coping and Health Project, Madison, University of Wisconsin, 1986.
Epstein N, Bishop D, Baldwin L: McMaster model of family functioning: A view of the normal family, in Walsh F (ed): Normal Family Processes. New York, Guilford Press, 1982.
Epstein N, Levin S, Bishop D: The family as a social unit. Can Fam Phys 22: 1411 1413, 1976.
McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, 1987.
Moos RH: Family Environment Scales. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1974.
Olson DH, Portner J, Bell R: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Family Social Science. St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1978.
Olson DH, Portner J, Bell R: FACES II: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Family Social Science. St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1982.
Olson DH, Portner J, Lavee Y: FACES III: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Family Social Science. St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1985.
Smilkstein G: The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Prac 6: 1231–1239, 1978.
Steinhauer PS, Santa Barbara J, Skinner HA: The process model of family functioning. Can J Psychiat 29: 77–88, 1984.
McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA: Family system assessment in health care, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, pp. 52–78, 1987.
McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA, Thompson AI: Family time and routines scale, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, pp. 133–144, 1987.
McCubbin HI, Olson DH, Lavee Y, Patterson JM: Family index of resiliency and adaptation, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Winconsin, pp. 285–305, 1987.
Haley J: Problem-Solving Therapy. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1976.
Doherty, WJ, Baird MA: Family Therapy and Family Medicine: Toward the Primary Care of Families. New York, Guilford Press, 1983.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heyrman, J., Dessers, L., de Munter, MB., Haepers, K., Craenen, J. (1990). Functional Status Assessment in the Elderly. In: Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97198-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8977-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive