Skip to main content

Functional Status Assessment in the Elderly

  • Chapter
Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care

Part of the book series: Frontiers of Primary Care ((PRIMARY))

Abstract

The AMP-scoring system was developed as part of a project for the production of an integrated computerized medical record for general practice (1). Its purpose is the assessment of functional status, primarily in the elderly, who are defined as persons aged 75 years and over. The assessment of functional status is particularly important in the elderly. Diagnostic assessments and decisions about therapeutic interventions require at least a possibility for improvements in health. The knowledge of functional status as a measurement of health is very important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  1. Heyrman J, Dessers L: Development of instruments for computerization of an integrated medical record for general practice. NFWO-grant 3/9005/87/N.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holst OR: Content Analysis. In: Lindzey G and Aroson E. The Handbook of Social Psychology. London: Addison-Wesley; 1968:601.

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Munter B: The General Practitioner and the Elderly in Primary Care, an Explorative Study on the Registration Behavior of 14 GP’s. Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven; 1988. Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antonovsky A: Health, Stress, and Coping: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical Well-Being. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antonovsky A: Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP: Stressful Life Events: Their Nature and Effects. New York, Wiley 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS (eds): Stressful Life Events and Their Contexts. Series in Psychological Epidemiology, Nr. 2, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher S, Reason J (eds): Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health. New York, Wiley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan HB (ed): Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research. New York, Academic Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coelho GV, Hamburg DA, Adams JE: Coping Adaptation. New York, Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen F, Lazarus RS: Coping with the Stress of illness, in Stone GC, Cohen, F, Adler NE (eds): Health Psychology: A Handbook. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pearlin L, Schooler C: The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 19: 2–21, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ursin H: Activation, coping, and psychosomatics, in Ursin H, Baade E, Levine S (eds): Psychobiology of Stress: A Study of Coping Men. New York, Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cassel J: The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. Am J Epidemiol 104: 107–123, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA, Patterson JM, Cauble AE, Wilson LR, Warwick W: Coping health inventory for patients: an assessment of parential coping patterns in the care of the chronically III child. J Marriage and the Fam 45: 359–371, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA: Family stress theory and assessment: The T-double ABCX model of family adjustment and adaptation, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, pp. 3–34, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, Pirner P: Family Rituals Typologies and Family Strengths. Family Stress Coping and Health Project, Madison, University of Wisconsin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Epstein N, Bishop D, Baldwin L: McMaster model of family functioning: A view of the normal family, in Walsh F (ed): Normal Family Processes. New York, Guilford Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Epstein N, Levin S, Bishop D: The family as a social unit. Can Fam Phys 22: 1411 1413, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moos RH: Family Environment Scales. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olson DH, Portner J, Bell R: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Family Social Science. St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olson DH, Portner J, Bell R: FACES II: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Family Social Science. St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Olson DH, Portner J, Lavee Y: FACES III: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Family Social Science. St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smilkstein G: The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Prac 6: 1231–1239, 1978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinhauer PS, Santa Barbara J, Skinner HA: The process model of family functioning. Can J Psychiat 29: 77–88, 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA: Family system assessment in health care, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, pp. 52–78, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCubbin HI, McCubbin MA, Thompson AI: Family time and routines scale, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Wisconsin, pp. 133–144, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCubbin HI, Olson DH, Lavee Y, Patterson JM: Family index of resiliency and adaptation, in McCubbin HI, Thompson AI (eds): Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, University of Winconsin, pp. 285–305, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haley J: Problem-Solving Therapy. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Doherty, WJ, Baird MA: Family Therapy and Family Medicine: Toward the Primary Care of Families. New York, Guilford Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heyrman, J., Dessers, L., de Munter, MB., Haepers, K., Craenen, J. (1990). Functional Status Assessment in the Elderly. In: Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97198-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8977-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics