Skip to main content

Assessing Function: Does It Really Make a Difference? A Preliminary Evaluation of the Acceptability and Utility of the COOP Function Charts

  • Chapter
Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care

Part of the book series: Frontiers of Primary Care ((PRIMARY))

Abstract

Despite the intuitive appeal of functionally oriented, health care management, the clinical utility of routine functional assessment remains questionable. The Dartmouth COOP project, a primary care research network, has developed a practical, reliable, valid Chart System for use in busy clinical practices. The goal of the current study was to assess its potential clinical utility and acceptability to patients and clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cluff L: Chronic disease, function and quality care. J Chron Dis. 34: 299–304, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deyo RA, Inui TS: Toward clinical applications of health status measures: Sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. Health Services Res. 19 (3): 275–289, 1984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kane RA, Kane RL: Assessing the Elderly, New York, Lexington Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sage WM, Hurst CR, Silverman JF, Bortz WM: Intensive care for the elderly: Outcome of elective and non-elective admissions. J Am Geriat So. 35: 312–318, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mackenzie CR, Charlson ME, DiGioia D, Kelley K: A patient-specific measure of change in maximal function. Arch Int Med. 146: 1325–1329, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker FB, Novack DH, Kaiser DL, et al.: Anxiety and depression among medical and surgical patients nearing hospital discharge. J Gen Int Med. 2: 99–101, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Balestia D, et al.: Capitation for medical care: The importance of health status in older patients. Med Care. 25 (10): 1002–1005, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas JW, Lichtenstein R: Including health status in Medicare adjusted average per capita cost capitation formula. Med Care. 24 (3): 259–275, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pinhold EM, Kroenke K, Hanley JF, et al.: Functional assessment of the elderly: A comparison of standard instruments with clinical judgement. Arch Intern Med. 147: 484–488, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis TC, Nathan RG, Crouch MA, Bairnsfather LE: Screening depression in primary care: Back to the basics with a new tool. Fam Med. 19: 200–202, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. German PS, Shapiro S, Skinner EA, et al.: Detection and management of mental health problems of older patients by primary care providers. JAMA. 257 (4): 489–493, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott W: Absence of indicators of the influence of its physicians on a society’s health. Am J Med. 70: 833–843, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McDermott W: Absence of indicators of the influence of its physicians on a society’s health. Am J Med. 70: 833–843, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson EC, Berwick DM: The measurement of health status in clinical practice. Med Care. 27 (3): 577–590, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, et al.: Dartmouth COOP proposal to develop and demonstrate a system to assess functional health status in physicians’ offices. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Final Report Grant # 85–3180, October 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Kirk JW: Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis. 40(S1):55S–63S, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Landgraf, J.M., Nelson, E.C., Hays, R.D., Wasson, J.H., Kirk, J.W. (1990). Assessing Function: Does It Really Make a Difference? A Preliminary Evaluation of the Acceptability and Utility of the COOP Function Charts. In: Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97198-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8977-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics