Advertisement

Interpretation of the Videofluoroscopic Study

  • M. Leon Skolnick
  • Ellen R. Cohn

Abstract

Years ago there was a coffee and doughnut shop in New York City called “Mayflower,” which emphasized as part of its advertising slogan that one should keep an eye on the doughnut and not on the hole. In analyzing videofluoroscopic studies, we, on the other hand, should pay equal attention to the hole (velopharyngeal portal) and the doughnut (palate and pharyngeal walls ringing the VP portal). When the sphincter does not close, there is a hole. Unlike the doughnut, however, this hole is not symmetrically round but has different contours along different margins. In order to understand the manner in which the velopharyngeal portal closes, we must examine the contributions that the palate (velum) and pharyngeal walls each make. This understandably is best appreciated by examining the component movements of the palate and pharyngeal walls in the lateral, frontal, and base views.

Keywords

Frontal View Pharyngeal Wall Cleft Palate Posterior Pharyngeal Wall Base View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Graber TM, Bzoch KR, Aoba T: A functional study of palatal and pharyngeal structures. Angle Orthodont 29: 30, 1959Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simpson RK, Austin AA: A cephalometric investigation of velar stretch. Cleft Palate J 9: 341, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mourino AR, Weinberg B: A cephalometric study of velar stretch in 8 and 10 year old children. Cleft Palate J 12: 417, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McWilliams BJ, Morris HL, Shelton RL. Cleft Palate Speech. Philadelphia: BC Decker, 1984Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moll KL, Shriner TA: Preliminary investigation of a new concept of velar activity during speech. Cleft Palate J 4: 58, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moll KL: Velopharyngeal closure on vowels. J Speech Hear Res 5: 30, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McWilliams BJ, Musgrave RH: The influence of head position upon velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J 5 (2): 117, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glaser (Cohn) ER, Skolnick ML, McWilliams BJ, Shprintzen RJ: The dynamics of Passavant’s ridge in subjects with and without velopharyngeal insufficiency—A multiview videofluoroscopic study. Cleft Palate J 16: 24, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelsey CA, Ewanowski SJ, Crummy AB, Bless DM: Lateral pharyngeal wall motion as a predictor of surgical success in velopharyngeal insufficiency. New Eng J Med 287 (2): 64, 1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shprintzen RJ, Lencione RM, McCall GN, Skolnick ML: A three dimensional cinefluoroscopic analysis of velopharyngeal closure during speech and non-speech activities in normals. Cleft Palate J 11: 412, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Leon Skolnick
    • 1
  • Ellen R. Cohn
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of CommunicationsUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations