Skip to main content

Explaining the Link Between Causal Reasoning and Expert Behavior

  • Chapter
Selected Topics in Medical Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

There is a paradox in causal reasoning. It can be a powerful tool when making a difficult diagnosis1 and is frequently used when explaining why a particular diagnosis is correct. Diagnosticians in a variety of domains, however, do not seem to use it much when performing routine diagnoses.2 Why not?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Patil R: Causal Representation of Patient Illness for Electrolyte and Acid-Base Diagnosis, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981 (available as MIT/LCS/TR-267).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson PJ, Moen JB: Garden Path Errors in Diagnostic Reasoning. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Swartout WR: A Digitalis Therapy Advisor with Explanations. TR-176. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute Technology, Technical Report Laboratory for Computer Science, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swartout W: XPLAIN: a system for creating and explaining expert consulting systems. Artif Intell 21: 285, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swartout W: Knowledge needed for expert system explanation. Future Comput Syst 1(2), 1986, 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Swartout W: Producing Explanations and Justifications of Expert Consulting Systems. Technical Report 251. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brachman R: A Structural Paradigm for Representing Knowledge. Report No. 3605. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neches R, Swartout WR, and Moore JD: Enhanced maintenance and explanation of expert systems through explicit models of their development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-11, (11), November 1985, 1337–1351

    Google Scholar 

  9. Polya G: How To Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. 2nd Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laird J, Newell A: A Universal Weak Method. Technical Report CMU-CS83–141. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University Department of Computer Science, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swartout, W.R., Smoliar, S.W. (1988). Explaining the Link Between Causal Reasoning and Expert Behavior. In: Miller, P.L. (eds) Selected Topics in Medical Artificial Intelligence. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8777-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8777-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8779-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8777-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics