Skip to main content

Evaluation of Medical Expert Systems: Case Study in Performance Assessment

  • Chapter
Selected Topics in Medical Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

As with any new agent introduced into medical practice, a medical expert system must be critically evaluated for its safety and efficacy in a clinical setting prior to its use in patient care. Assessing expert system performance in this way is similar to data collection in that it can be a difficult and time-consuming process. At least three aspects of system performance can be considered*: accuracy, usefulness, and transferability.2 In this section a framework for viewing expert system performance assessment is outlined. The next section illustrates the concepts involved by discussing the clinical evaluation of an expert system that assists with management of patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). The final section identifies factors that were crucial in the efficient development and testing of the TIA expert system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chandrasekaran B: On evaluating AI systems for medical diagnosis. In: Proceeding MEDCOMP ’82. Philadelphia: IEEE, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reggia J, Tuhrim S: An overview of computer-assisted medical decision making. In Reggia J, Tuhrim S (eds): Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making. New York: Springer Verlag, 1985, pp. 3–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. McNeil B, Keeler E, Adelstein S: Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med 293:211, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Salamon R, Bernadet M, Samson M, Derouesne C, Gremy F: Bayesian method applied to decision making in neurology—methodological considerations. Methods Inf Med 15:174, 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller R, Pople H, Myers J: INTERNIST-I, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med 307: 468, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu VL, Fagan LM, Wraith SM, Clancey WJ, Scott AC, Hanningan J, Blum RL, Buchanan BG, Cohen SN: Antimicrobial selection by a computer—a blinded evaluation by infectious disease experts. JAMA 42:1279, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss S, Kulikowski C, Safir A: Glaucoma consultation by computer. Comput Biol Med 8:25, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spitzer R, Cohen J, Fleiss J, Endicott J: Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 17:83, 1967.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen J: Weighted kappa. Psychol Bull 70:213, 1968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro A: The evaluation of clinical predictions. N Engl J Med 296:1509, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zagoria R, Reggia J: Transferability of medical decision support systems based on Bayesian classification. Med Decis Making 3:501, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dannenberg A, Shapiro A, Fries J: Enhancement of clinical predictive ability by computer consultation. Methods Inf Med 18:10, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller P: Critiquing-a different approach to expert computer advice in medicine. p. 17. In: Proceedings Eighth Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. Washington DC: IEEE, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Langlotz C, Shortliffe E: Adopting a consultation system to critique user plans. Int J Man-Machine Stud 19:479, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jelliffe R, Buell J, Kalaba R: Reduction of digitalis toxicity by computer-assisted glycoside dosage regimens. Ann Intern Med 77:891, 1972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DeDombal F: Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J 2:9, 1972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pryor T, Gardner R, Clayton P, Warner H: The HELP system. p. 109. In Blum B (ed): Information Systems for Patient Care,New York: Springer Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zoltie N, Horrocks J, deDombal F: Computer assisted diagnosis of dyspepsia-report of transferability of a system, with emphasis on early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods Inf Med 16:89, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Calanchini P, Swanson P, Gotshall R, Haerer A, Poshanzer D, Price T: Cooperative study of hospital frequency and character of transient ischemic attacks: IV. The reliability of diagnosis: JAMA 238:2029, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher R, Hanley D, Whisnant J, Barnett H: Transient Ischemic Attacks. Read before the American Society for Neurological Investigation, San Francisco, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haerer A, Gotshall R, Conneally P, Dyken M, Poshanzer D, Price T, Swanson P, Calanchini P: Cooperative study of hospital frequency and character of transient ischemic attacks. III. Variations in treatment. JAMA 238:142, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Swanson P, Calanchini P, Dyken M, Gotshall R, Haerer A, Poskanzer D, Price T, Conneally P: Cooperative study of hospital frequency and character of transient: ischemic attacks. II. Performance of angiography among six centers. JAMA 237:2202, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Toole, J, Howard G: Management of asymptomatic carotid artery murmur and transient ischemic attacks. Arch Neurol 38:443, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reggia J, Pula T, Price T, and Perricone B: Towards an intelligent textbook of neurology. p. 190. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York: IEEE, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shortliffe E: Computer-Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN New York: Elsevier, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reggia J, Tabb R, Price T, Banko M, Hebel R: Computer-aided assessment of transient ischemic attacks. Arch Neurol 41:1248, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dyken M, Conneally M, Haerer A, Gotshall R, Calanchini P, Poskanzer D, Price T, Swanson P: Cooperative study of hospital frequency and character of transient ischemic attacks. I. Background, organization, and clinical survey. JAMA 237:882, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kunitz S, Havekost C, Gross C: Pilot data bank networks for neurological disorders, p. 793. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. Long Beach, CA: IEEE, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davis R: Expert systems: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Artif Intell Magazine, 3:3, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reggia, J.A. (1988). Evaluation of Medical Expert Systems: Case Study in Performance Assessment. In: Miller, P.L. (eds) Selected Topics in Medical Artificial Intelligence. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8777-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8777-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8779-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8777-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics