Advertisement

Mosquito Maternity: Egg Brooding in the Life Cycle of Trichoprosopon digitatum

  • L. P. Lounibos
  • C. E. Machado-Allison
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)

Abstract

Subsocial or presocial behavior, as distinguished from the more sophisticated eusociality of ants, bees, or termites, has evolved independently many times among otherwise solitary insects. Perhaps the simplest of subsocial behaviors is egg attendance, a form of parental care, which has been documented in virtually every major insect order (Hinton 1981). Presocial behaviors appear to have evolved in the course of exploitation of either particularly favorable or unusually severe environments (Wilson 1971). For example, when resources are abundant yet ephemeral, scarabaeid parents may protect offspring from intense competition by provisioning dung balls to nourish their larvae. In the exploitation of harsh environments, parental attendance is known to reduce lace bug mortality due to predation (Tallamy and Denno 1981), fungal invasion of earwig nests (Lamb 1976) and oxygen depletion in staphylinid burrows (Bro Larsen 1952). Although parental care is one evolutionary solution to environmental pressures, Tallamy (1984) cautions that it is a costly trait, predicted to evolve only in the presence of intense selective pressure and specific behavioral precursors.

Keywords

Parental Care Brooding Behavior Splash Erosion Parental Attendance Costly Trait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, T.H.G., Hingwan, J.O., Manuel R., Hosein, H.: Laboratory colonization of Trichoprosopon digitatum (Rondani) (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosq. News 28, 445–454 (1968).Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, C.W., Vongpradist, S., Mongkolpanya, K.: Observations of an unusual oviposition habit in Armigeres (Leicesteria) annulitarsis (Leicester) Mosq. News 35, 564–565 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. Bro Larsen, E.: On subsocial beetles from the salt-marsh, their care of progeny and adaptation to salt and tide. In: Transactions of the 11th International Congress of Entomology, 1952, pp. 502–506.Google Scholar
  4. Focks, D.A., Sackett, S.R.: Some factors affecting interaction of Toxorhynchites amboiensis with Aedes and Culex in an urban environment. In: Ecology of Mosquitoes: Proceedings of a Workshop. Lounibos, L.P., Rey, J.R., Frank, J.H. (eds.). Vero Beach, Florida: Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, 1985, pp 55–64.Google Scholar
  5. Frank, J.H., Curtis, G.A.: On the bionomics of bromeliad-inhabiting mosquitoes. IV. Egg mortality of Wyeomyia vanduzeei caused by rainfall. Mosq. News 37, 239–245 (1977a).Google Scholar
  6. Frank, J.H., Curtis, G.A.: On the bionomics of bromeliad-inhabiting mosquitoes. V. A mark-release-recapture technique for estimation of population size of Wyeomyia vanduzeei. Mosq. News 37, 444–452 (1977b).Google Scholar
  7. Frank, J.H., Curtis, G.A., Erdos, G.W., Ellis, E.A.: On the bionomics of bromeliad-inhabiting mosquitoes. VIII. The flotational structure of Wyeomyia vanduzeei eggs (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 18, 337–340 (1981).Google Scholar
  8. Hinton, H.E.: The Biology of Insect Eggs. Oxford: Pergamon Press, Vol. 1, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Howard, L.O., Dyar, H.G., Knab, F.: The Mosquitoes of North and Central America and the West Indies. Vol. 3, Systematic Description. Washington: Carnegie Inst., 1915.Google Scholar
  10. Knight, K.L., Stone, A.: A Catalog of the Mosquitoes of the World. Baltimore: Thomas Say Foundation, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Lamb, R.J.: Parental behavior in the Dermaptera with special references to Forficula auricularia (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). Can. Entomol. 108, 609–619 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laws, J.O.: Measurement of fall velocity of water drops and rain drops. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 22, 709–721 (1941).Google Scholar
  13. Lounibos, L.P.: Behavioral convergences among fruit-husk mosquitoes. Fla. Entomol. 66, 32–41 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lounibos, L.P., Machado-Allison, C.E.: Oviposition and egg brooding by the mosquito Trichoprosopon digitatum in cacao husks. Ecol. Entomol. 8, 475–478 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lounibos, L.P., Machado-Allison, C.E.: Female brooding protects mosquito eggs from rainfall. Biotropica 18 (in press).Google Scholar
  16. MacDonald, W.W.: Malaysian parasites, XXXVIII. On the systematics and ecology of Armigeres subgenus Leicesteria (Diptera, Culicidae). Stud. Inst. Med.Res. Malaya 20, 110–153 (1960).Google Scholar
  17. Machado-Allison, C.E., Rodriguez, D.J., Barrera-R., R. Gomez-Cova, C.: The insect community associated with inflorescences of Heliconia caribaea Lamarck in Venezuela. In: Phytotelmata: Terrestrial Plants as Hosts for Aquatic Insect Communities. Frank, J.H., Lounibos, L.P. (eds.). Medford, New Jersey: Plexus, 1983, pp. 247–270.Google Scholar
  18. Machado-Allison, C.E., Barrera-R., R. Frank, J.H., Delgado, L., Gomez-Cova, C.: Mosquito communities in Venezuelan phytotelmata. In: Ecology of Mosquitoes: Proceedings of a Workshop. Lounibos, L.P., Rey, J.R., Frank, J.H. (eds.). Vero Beach, Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, 1985, pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
  19. Maguire, B.: Phytotelmata: biota and community structure determination in plant-held waters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2, 439–464 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mattingly, P.F.: Mosquito eggs. XVII. Further notes on egg parasitization in the genus Armigeres. Mosq. Syst. 4, 1–8 (1972a).Google Scholar
  21. Mattingly, P.F.: Mosquito eggs. XX. Egg parasitism in Anopheles with a further note on Armigeres. Mosq. Syst. 4, 84–86 (1972b).Google Scholar
  22. Mattingly, P.F.: Mosquito eggs. XXVI. Further descriptions of sabethine eggs. Mosq. Syst. 6, 231–238 (1974).Google Scholar
  23. Pajot, F.-X.: Contribution à l’étude écologique d’Aedes (Stegomyia) simpsoni (Theobald, 1905) (Diptera, Culicidae). Observations concernant les stades préimaginaux. Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Entomol. Méd. Parasit. 16, 129–150 (1976).Google Scholar
  24. Pawan, J.L.: The oviposition of Joblotia digitatus Rondani (Diptera, Culicidae). Insecutor Inscitiae Mens. 10, 63–65 (1922).Google Scholar
  25. Richards, P.W.: The Tropical Rain Forest. London: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 1966.Google Scholar
  26. Seifert, R.P.: Mosquito fauna of Heliconia aurea. J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 687–697 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seifert, R.P., Barrera-R., R.: Cohort studies on mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae living in the water-filled floral bracts of Heliconia aurea (Zingiberales: Musaceae). Ecol. Entomol. 6, 191–197 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strickland, C.: A curious adaptation of habit to its environment of a Malayan mosquito. J. Straits Br. Roy. Asiatic Soc. 75, 39 (1917).Google Scholar
  29. Tallamy, D.W.: Insect parental care. Bioscience 34, 20–24 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tallamy, D.W., Denno, R.F.: Maternal care in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Anim. Behav. 29, 771–778 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teesdale, C.: The genus Musa Linn, and its role in the breeding of Aedes (Stegomyia) simpsoni (Theo.) on the Kenya coast. Bull. Entomol. Res. 48, 251–260 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williamson, G.B.: Driptips and splash erosion. Biotropica 13, 228–231 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, E.O.: The Insect Societies. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1971.Google Scholar
  34. Zavortink, T.J.: Species complexes in the genus Trichoprosopon. Mosq. Syst. 13, 82–85 (1981).Google Scholar
  35. Zavortink, T.J., Roberts, D.R., Hoch, A.L.: Trichoprosopon digitatum—Morphology, biology, and potential medical importance. Mosq. Syst. 15, 141–149 (1983).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. P. Lounibos
  • C. E. Machado-Allison

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations