Pollen Allocation in Wild Radish: Variation in Pollen Grain Size and Number

  • Maureen L. Stanton
  • Robert E. Preston


The vast majority of the world’s plant species are hermaphroditic, but until the very recent past, plant population biologists have focused almost exclusively on maternal reproduction through seeds. Disregarding male reproductive success leads to an incomplete (and potentially misleading) picture of fitness hierarchies within plant populations, as an individual’s success as a male need not be correlated with its success as a female (Bertin, 1982). Accordingly, recent studies have increasingly emphasized male fitness achieved through the successful fertilization of ovules on other individuals (e.g. Queller, 1983).


Pollen Tube Growth Sexual Allocation Raphanus Sativus Male Reproductive Success Male Fitness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barnes DK, Cleveland RW (1963) Pollen tube growth of diploid alfalfa in vitro. Crop Sci 3:291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertin RI (1982) Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper. Am Nat 119: 694–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cruden RW (1976) Intraspecific variation in pollen-ovule ratios and nectar secretion— preliminary evidence of ecotypic adaptation. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 63:277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellstrand NC, Marshall DL (1985) The impact of domestication on distribution of allozyme variation within and among cultivars of radish, Raphanus sativus L. Theor Appl Genet 69: (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Hammer K (1978) Entwick1ungstendenzen blutenokologischer Merkmale bei Plantago. Flora, Bd 167: 41–56.Google Scholar
  6. Lloyd DG (1984) Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: Dirzo R and Sarukhan J (eds), Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 277–300.Google Scholar
  7. Lord EM, Eckard KJ (1984) Incompatibility between the dimorphic flowers of Collomia grandiflora, a cleistogamous species. Science 223: 695–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ottaviano E, Sari-Gorla M, Arenari I (1983) Male gametophyte competitive ability in maize selection and implications with regard to the breeding system. In: Mulcahy D and Ottaviano E (eds), Pollen: Biology and Implications for Plant Breeding. Elsevier, pp 367–374.Google Scholar
  9. Panetsos CP, Baker HG (1968) The origin of variation in “wild”0 Raphanus sativus (Cruciferae) in California. Genetica 38: 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Queller DC (1983) Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature 305: 706–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ross MD, Gregorius HR (1983) Outcrossing and sex function in hermaphrodites: a resource allocation model. Am Nat 121: 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maureen L. Stanton
    • 1
  • Robert E. Preston
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations