Well Posed Optimal Control Problems: A Perturbation Approach

  • Tullio Zolezzi
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 78)


Tikhonov and Hadamard well posedness. Let X be a convergence space and

$$ J:X \to ( - \infty , + \infty ] $$

a proper extended-real valued function on X. The (global) minimization problem (X, J) is called Tikhonov well posed iff there exists exactly one global minimizer x* and every minimizing sequence for (X, J) converges to x*; Hadamard well posed iff there exists exactly one global minimizer x* and, roughly speaking, x* depends continuously upon problem’s data.


Optimal Control Problem Strong Convergence Real Banach Space Convergence Space Posedness Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A. TIKHONOV, On the stability of the functional minimization method, USSR Comput. Math, and Math. Phys. 6 (1966), 26–33.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. TIKHONOV, Methods for the regularization of optimal control problems, Soviet Math. Dokl. 6 (1965), 761–763.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. HADAMARD, Sur le problèmes aux dérivées partielles et leur signification physique, Bull. Univ. Princeton 13 (1902), 49–52.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. LUCCHETTI, F. PATRONE, A characterization of Tikhonov well posedness for minimum problems with application to variational inequalities, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 3 (1981), 461–476.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. R. LUCCHETTI, F. PATRONE, Some properties of “well-posed” variational inequalities governed by linear operators., Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 5 (1982–83), 349–361.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. DONTCHEV, T. ZOLEZZI, Well posed optimization problems, Lecture Notes in Math. 1543 (1993), Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. ASPLUND, R. ROCKAPELLAR, Gradients of convex functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (1969), 443–467.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. FLTZPATRICK, Metric projection and the differentiability of distance functions, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 22 (1980), 291–312.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. FLEMING, The Cauchy problem for a nonlinear first-order partial differential equation, J. Differential Equations 5 (1969), 515–530.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. FLEMING, R. RISHEL, Deterministic and stochastic optimal control, Springer, New York, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    F. CLARKE, P. LOEWEN, The value function in optimal control: sensitivity, controllability, and time-optimality, SIAM J. Control Optim. 24 (1986), 243–263.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. FLEMING, M. SONER, Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions, Springer, New York, 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. CLARKE, P. WOLENSKI, The sensitivity of optimal control problems to time delay, SIAM J. Control Optim. 29 (1991), 1176–1215.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. ZOLEZZI, Well posedness criteria in optimization with application to the calculus of variations, Submitted.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. CLARKE, Perturbed optimal control problems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-31 (1986), 535–542.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tullio Zolezzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di MatematicaUniversita’ di GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations