Robust Control Theory pp 143-173 | Cite as

# Let’s Get Real

## Abstract

This paper gives an overview of promising new developments in robust stability and performance analysis of linear control systems with real parametric uncertainty. The goal is to develop a practical algorithm for medium size problems, where medium size means less than 100 real parameters, and “practical” means avoiding combinatoric (nonpolynomial) growth in computation with the number of parameters for all of the problems which arise in engineering applications. We present an algorithm and experimental evidence to suggest that this goal has, for the first time, been achieved. We also place these results in context by comparing with other approaches to robustness analysis.

## Keywords

Block Structure Robust Stability Structure Uncertainty Unmodeled Dynamic Power Iteration## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]G. Balas, J. Doyle, K. Glover, A. Packard, and R. Smith,
*The µ analysis and synthesis toolbox*, MathWorks and MUSYN, 1991.Google Scholar - [2]G. J. Balas and A. K. Packard,
*Development and application of time-varying µ-synthesis techniques for control design of missile autopilots*, John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratories, (final report) January, 1992.Google Scholar - [3]G. J. Balas, P. M. Young, and J. C. Doyle,
*µ based control design as applied*to a*large space*structure:*Control design for*the*minimast facility*, NASA CSI/GI (final report) June 1992.Google Scholar - [4]V. Balakrishnan, S. Boyd, and S. Balemi, Branch and Bound algorithm for computing the minimum stability degree of parameter-dependent linear systems, (tech. rep.) Information Systems laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 1991.Google Scholar
- [5]B. Barmish, P. Khargonekar, Z. Shi, and R. Tempo,
*Robustness margin need not be a continuous function of the problem data*, Systems Control Letters, vol.**15**, (1989), pp. 91–98.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [6]A. C. Bartlett, C. V. Hollot, and H. Lin,
*Root locations of an entire polytope of polynomials: It suffices to check the edges*, Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems, Springer Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar - [7]R. D. Braatz, P. M. Young, J. C. Doyle, and M. Morari,
*Computational complexity of calculation*, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39 (1994), pp. 1000–1002.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [8]C. Beck and J. C. Doyle,
*Mixed µ upper bound computation*, Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Decision and Control, (1992), pp. 3187–3192.Google Scholar - [9]J. Chen, M. K. H. Fan, and C. N. Nett,
*The structured singular value and stability of uncertain polynomials: A missing link*, Control of Systems with Inexact Dynamic Models, ASME, (1991), pp. 15–23.Google Scholar - [10]R. R. E. De Gaston and M. G. Safanov,
*Exact calculation of the multiloop stability margin*, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.**33**, (1988), pp. 156–171.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [11]J. Demmel,
*The componentwise distance to the nearest singular matrix*, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol.**13**, (1992), pp. 10–19.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [12]J. Doyle,
*Analysis of feedback systems with structured uncertainty*, IEE Proceedings, Part D, vol.**129**, Nov (1982), pp. 242–250.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [13]J. C. Doyle,
*Structured uncertainty in control system design*, IEEE Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Decision and Control, (1985), pp. 260–265.Google Scholar - [14]J. Doyle, A. Packard, and K. Zhou,
*Review of LFTs, LMIs and µ*, Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control, (1991), pp. 1227–1232.Google Scholar - [15]M. K. H. Fan, A. L. Tits, and J. C. Doyle,
*Robustness in the presence of mixed parametric uncertainty and unmodeled dynamics*, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.**AC-36**, (1991), pp. 25–38.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [16]M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson,
*Computers and Intractability: A Guide*to*the Theory of NP Completeness*, New York: W. H. Freeman, 1979.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [17]J. P. How AND S. R. Hall, Connections between the Popov criterion and bounds for real parametric uncertainty, (submitted to) IEEE Transactions on Auto-matic Control.Google Scholar
- [18]V. L. Kharitonov,
*Asymptotic stability of an equilibrium position of a family of systems of linear differential equations*, Differential Equations, vol.**14**, (1979), pp. 1483–1485.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [19]W. M. Lu, K. Zhou, and J. Doyle,
*Stabilization of LFT systems*, Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control, (1991), pp. 1239–1244.Google Scholar - [20]A. Megretsky, Power distribution approach in robust control, (tech. rep.) Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1992.Google Scholar
- [21]M. P. Newlin and P. M. Young,
*Mixed problems and Branch and Bound techniques*, Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Decision and Control, (1992), pp. 3175–3180.Google Scholar - [22]A. K. Packard,
*What’s new with µ: Structured Uncertainty in Multivariable Control*, (PhD thesis) University of California, Berkeley, 1988.Google Scholar - [23]A. Packard and J. C. Doyle,
*Structured singular value with repeated scalar blocks*, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, (1988), pp. 1213–1218.Google Scholar - [24]A. K. Packard and J. C. Doyle, The
*complex structured singular value*, Automatica,**29**, (1993), pp. 71–109.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [25]A. K. Packard and P. Pandey,
*Continuity properties of the real/complex structured singular value*, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,**38**(1993), pp. 415–428.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [26]A. Rantzer and A. Megretsky, A convex parameterization of robustly stabilizing controllers, (tech. rep.) Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1992.Google Scholar
- [27]R. Redheffer,
*Inequalities for a matrix riccati equation*, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, vol.**8**, no. 3, 1959.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [28]J. Rohn and S. Poljak,
*Checking robust nonsingularity is NP-hard*,(to appear in) Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems.Google Scholar - [29]J. S. Shamma,
*Robustness Analysis for Time-Varying Systems*, Proceedings of the 31st. Conference on Decision and Control, (1992), pp. 3163–3168.Google Scholar - [30]A. Sideris and R. S. Sanchez Pesa,
*Fast computation of the multivariable stability margin for real interrelated uncertain parameters*, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 34, Dec (1989), pp. 1272–1276.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [31]G. Stein and J. C. Doyle,
*Beyond singular values and loop shapes*, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol.**14**, January (1991), pp. 5–16.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - [32]J. E. Tierno and P. M. Young, An
*improved µ lower bound via adaptive power iteration*, Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Decision and Control, (1992), pp. 3181–3186.Google Scholar - [33]P. M. Young,
*Robustness with parametric*and*dynamic uncertainty*. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1993.Google Scholar - [34]P. M. Young,
*The rank one mixed µ problem and “Kharitonov-type” analysis*, (to appear in) Automatica.Google Scholar - [35]P. M. Young and J. C. Doyle,
*Computation of with real and complex uncertainties*, IEEE Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control, (1990), pp. 1230–1235.Google Scholar - [36]P. M. Young and J. C. Doyle,
*Properties of the mixed problem and its bounds*, (submitted to) IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.Google Scholar - [37]P. M. Young, M. P. Newlin, and J. C. Doyle,
*µ analysis with real parametric uncertainty*, IEEE Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control, (1991), pp. 1251–1256.Google Scholar - [38]P. M. Young, M. P. Newlin, and J. C. Doyle,
*Practical computation of the mixed µ problem*, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, (1992), pp. 2190–2194, (1992).Google Scholar