Advertisement

Does Rantzer’s Convex Direction Theorem Sound the Death Knell for New Vertex Results in Robust Control?

  • C. V. Hollot
Conference paper
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 66)

Abstract

The legacy of Kharitonov’s Four-Polynomial Theorem are vertex results in robust control. At the heart of each of these is an associated vertex result for a convex combination of stable polynomials. Recently, Rantzer gave a so-called Convex Direction Theorem which seemingly sounded the death knell for finding new polynomial vertex results; hence, the search for new vertex results in robust control seemed at an end. The purpose of this paper is threefold. First, to introduce and review the literature on vertex results for convex combinations of polynomials. Second, to introduce the notion of convex directions and state Rantzer’s Convex Direction Theorem. Third, to pose and solve a parametric H problem in which the associated polynomial vertex problem fails to fit into the convex direction framework. This may help to dispell the conception that research in polynomial vertex results is dead and help spur new thinking.

Keywords

Robust Control Convex Combination Robust Stability Stable Polynomial Vertex Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    V.L. KHARITONOV, Asymptotic stability of an equilibrium position of a family of systems of linear differential equations, Differentsial’nye Uravneniya, 14 (1978), pp. 2086–2088.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. RANTZER, Stability conditions for a polytope of polynomials, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-37 (1992), pp. 79–89.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.G. BARTLETT, C.V. HOLLOT AND L. HUANG, Root locations for an entire polytope of polynomials: it suffices to check the edges, Mathematics of Controls, Signals and Systems, 1 (1988), pp. 61–71.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. BIALAS AND J. GARLOFF, Convex combinations of stable polynomials, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 319 (1985), pp. 373–377.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    I.R. PETERSEN, A new extension to kharitonov’s theorem, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-35 (1990), pp. 825–828.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C.V. HOLLOT AND F. YANG, Robust stabilization of interval plants using lead or lag compensators, Systems and Control Letters, 14 (1) (1990), pp. 9–12.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    B.R. BARMISH, C.V. HOLLOT, F.J. KRAUS AND R.TEMPO, Extreme point results for robust stabilization of interval plants with first order compensators, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37 (6) (1992), pp. 707–714.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    F.J. KRAUS, M. MANSOUR, W. TROUL AND B.D.O. ANDERSON, Robust stability of control systems: extreme point results for the stability of edges, International Journal of Control, 55 (5) (1992), pp. 1039–1049.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B.R. BARMISH AND H.I. KANG, Extreme point results for robust stability of interval plants: beyond first order compensators,Automatica, 28 (1992), pp. 1169–1180.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. CHAPELLAT, M. DAHLEH AND S.P. BHATTACHARYYA, Robust stability under structured and unstructured perturbations, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-35 (1990), pp. 1100–1108.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    C.V. HOLLOT AND R. TEMPO, New vertex results on H oo performance of interval plants and interval feedback systems, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Tucson, AZ, December 1992.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C.V. HOLLOT AND R. TEMPO, Hoo performance of weighted interval plants: complete characterization of vertex results,Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, June 1993 (to appear).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P.P. KHARGONEKAR AND A. TANNENBAUM, Non-euclidean metrics and the robust stabilization of systems with parameter uncertainties, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-30 (1985), pp. 1005–1013.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. CHAPELLAT AND S.P. BHATTACHARYYA, A generalization of Kharitonov’s Theorem: robust stability of interval plants, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-34 (1989), pp. 306–311.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C.V. HOLLOT, L. GUZZELLA, R. TEMPO, F. KRAUS AND M. MANSOUR, New vertex results in establishing the strict positive realness of weighted interval systems, Proceedings of the 12th IFAC World Congress, Sydney, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. V. Hollot
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations