Abstract
Because learning is one of the major goals of education, we frequently find measures of amount learned, or achievement, used in educational research. (Borg & Gall, 1989). When research addresses the problems of individuals with learning disabilities, for whom poor achievement in relation to intellectual potential represents the key identifying variable, we certainly expect to find research focusing on achievement and investigating ways to effect better achievement outcomes. In fact, among primary, data-based studies published over the past 3 to 5 years in three major research journals dedicated to learning disabilities, that is, Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice (formerly Learning Disabilities Research), Learning Disability Quarterly, and the Journal of Learning Disabilities, approximately 60% (as an average across the three journals) incorporated academic achievement among the variables investigated (this does not include studies that used academic measures only for demographics). Approximately 25% of the primary, data-based studies investigated strategies to effect better academic growth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Brown, A.L. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
Fuchs, D. & Fuchs, L.S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children, 57, 102–108.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429–438.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989b). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 43–52.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989c). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103–111.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 19, 6–22.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (in press). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and Student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1991). Indexing academic progress with curriculum-based measurement: Standard for judging improvement over time. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Gardner, E.F., Rudman, H.C., Karlsen, B., & Merwin, J.C. (1982). Standard achievement test. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.
Jenkins, J.R., Heliotis, J., Haynes, M., & Beck, K. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers’ comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69–75.
Leinhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343–362.
Slavin, R.E. (1987). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 19, 199–204.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D. (1994). Academic Assessment and Instrumentation. In: Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S. (eds) Research Issues in Learning Disabilities. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8347-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8345-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive