Skip to main content

Academic Assessment and Instrumentation

  • Chapter
Research Issues in Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Because learning is one of the major goals of education, we frequently find measures of amount learned, or achievement, used in educational research. (Borg & Gall, 1989). When research addresses the problems of individuals with learning disabilities, for whom poor achievement in relation to intellectual potential represents the key identifying variable, we certainly expect to find research focusing on achievement and investigating ways to effect better achievement outcomes. In fact, among primary, data-based studies published over the past 3 to 5 years in three major research journals dedicated to learning disabilities, that is, Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice (formerly Learning Disabilities Research), Learning Disability Quarterly, and the Journal of Learning Disabilities, approximately 60% (as an average across the three journals) incorporated academic achievement among the variables investigated (this does not include studies that used academic measures only for demographics). Approximately 25% of the primary, data-based studies investigated strategies to effect better academic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L. & Smiley, S.S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D. & Fuchs, L.S. (1990). Making educational research more important. Exceptional Children, 57, 102–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989b). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989c). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 19, 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (in press). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and Student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1991). Indexing academic progress with curriculum-based measurement: Standard for judging improvement over time. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, E.F., Rudman, H.C., Karlsen, B., & Merwin, J.C. (1982). Standard achievement test. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J.R., Heliotis, J., Haynes, M., & Beck, K. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers’ comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations? Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1987). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 19, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D. (1994). Academic Assessment and Instrumentation. In: Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S. (eds) Research Issues in Learning Disabilities. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8347-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8345-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics