Advertisement

Attitudes and Attitude Change: Mindlessness-Mindfulness Perspective

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

The study of attitudes has had a long and honored tradition among social psychologists, even to the extent of being defined as the core of social psychology itself (Allport, 1935; Bogardus, 1931; Folsom, 1931; Thomas & Znanieki, 1918). Since the early days of social psychology, the concept of attitude has gone through many changes. Research on attitudes was vigorous during many decades but is less prevalent at present. The reduced prominence of attitude research has prompted a theoretically oriented reconceptualization of the role of attitudes in social psychology. Accordingly, this chapter conceptualizes attitudes as part of a contextual whole and links attitude theory to the theory of mindfulness-mindlessness (M-M). This linkage illustrates how the concept of a situated attitude can be useful in a theoretically deeper understanding of the attitude-behavior link and the mechanics of attitude change.

Keywords

Attitude Change Affirmative Action Cognitive Dissonance Attribution Theory Attitude Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, C., Langer, E., Newman, R., & Chandler, H. (1982). Mindfulness and meditation: An experimental intervention with the institutionalized elderly. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Bern, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bern, D. (1970). Beliefs, attitudes and human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  6. Bogardus, E. S. (1931). Fundamentals of social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Century.Google Scholar
  7. Boring, E. G. (1930). A new ambiguous figure. American Journal of Psychology, 42, 444–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chanowitz, B., & Langer, E. (1981). Premature cognitive commitments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1051–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagly, A., & Himmelfarb, S. (1974). Current trends in attitude theory and research. In S. Himmelfarb & A. Eagly (Eds.), Readings in attitude change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, andhehavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Folsom, J. K. (1931). Social psychology. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  14. Ginsburg, G. (1980). Situated action, an emerging paradigm. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Hastorf, A. H., Schneider, D. J., & Polefka, J. (1970). Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, D. (1972). Some final considerations about experimentation in social psychology. In C. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  19. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E., & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Krech, D., Crutchfield, R., & Ballachey, E. (1962). Individual in society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Langer, E. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. II). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Langer, E. (1980). Playing the middle against both ends: The usefulness of adult cognitive activity as a model for cognitive activity in childhood and old age. In S. Yussen (Ed.), The development of reflection. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Langer, E. (1981). Old age: An artifact? In J. McGaugh & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Aging: Biology and behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Langer, E., Beck, P., Janoff-Bulman, R., & Timko, C. (1981). The relationship between cognitive deprivation and longevity in senile and nonsenile elderly populations. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  26. Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of placebic information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langer, E., & Imber, L. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: Debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2014–2025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langer, E., & Imber, L. (1980). Role of mindlessness in the perception of deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 360–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langer, E., & Newman, H. (1979). The role of mindlessness in a typical social psychological experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langer, E., Perlmuter, L., Chanowitz, B. C., & Rubin, R. (1982). Two new applications of mindlessness theory: Aging and alcoholism. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  31. Langer, E., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langer, E., Rodin, J., Beck, P., Weinman, C., & Spitzer, L. (1979). Environmental determinants of memory improvement in late adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2003–2013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langer, E., & Weinman, C. (1981). When thinking disrupts intellectual performance: Mindfulness on an overlearned task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. McGuire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodin, J., and Langer, E. (1977). Long-term effects of a control-relevant intervention with the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 897–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In C. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sahakian, W. (1974). Systematic social psychology. New York: Chandler.Google Scholar
  41. Schneider, D., Hastorf, A., & Ellsworth, P. (1979). Person perception (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  42. Schuman, H. (1972). Attitudes vs. actions versus attitudes vs. attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuman, H., & Johnson, M. P. (1976). Attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 161–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaver, K. G. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, M., Brimer, J., & White, R. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Staats, A. W. (1967). An outline of an integrated learning theory of attitude formation and function. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Thomas, W. I., & Znanieki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (Vol. 1). Boston: Badger.Google Scholar
  48. Wertheimer, M. (1944). Gestalt theory. Social Research, 11, 78–99.Google Scholar
  49. Wicker, A. (1969). Attitudes versus action: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimbardo, P., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1969). Influencing attitudes and changing behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations