Stereotyping and Sampling Biases in Intergroup Perception

Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)


In order for language to achieve its communicative function, it is essential that a given symbol be able to evoke a similar psychological representation across diverse individuals. Although many symbols or words succeed in eliciting highly similar meanings among different people, there is an important domain in which the discrepancies in meanings are at least as important as the similarities, and that is in the perception of the characteristics of human groups.


White Child Stimulus Person Intergroup Contact Outgroup Member Intergroup Conflict 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aries, E. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior, 7, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York: Halstead Press (Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1963). “Why do the Russians plant trees along the road?” Saturday Review, 46(95), 96.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thome, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawes, R. M., Singer, D., & Lemons, F. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doise, W. (1969). Intergroup relations and polarization of individual and collective judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doise, W. (1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eiser, J. R., & Osmon, B. E. (1978). Judgmental perspective and value connotations of response scale labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg, L. R. (1978). Differential attribution of trait-descriptive terms to one’s self as compared to well-liked, neutral and disliked others: A psychometric analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1012–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of one’s self and various types of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 517–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Howard, J., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for ingroup and outgroup behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Judd, C. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1980). Contrast effects in attitude judgment: An examination of the accentuation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 390–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LaFrance, M., & Mayo, C. (1976). Racial differences in gaze behavior during conversations: Two systematic observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyons, R. D. (November 29, 1970). Miami police study hints bigotry arises early from slum duty. The New York Times, p. 32.Google Scholar
  20. Nisbett, R. E., Caputo, C., Legant, P., & Maracek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, B. M., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributions of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Piliavin, J. A., & Martin, R. R. (1978). The effects of sex composition of groups on style of social interaction. Sex Roles, 4, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup-tgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ross, L. D., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control and biases in social perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rothbart, M., Evans, M., & Fulero, S. (1979). Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rothbart, M., Fulero, S., Jensen, C., Howard, J., & Birrell, P. (1978). From individual to group impressions: Availability heuristics in stereotype formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 237–255.Google Scholar
  27. Sagar, H. A., & Schofleld, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children’s perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skrypnek, B. J., & Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about men and women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston: Ginn and Co.Google Scholar
  30. Sussman, N. M., & Rosenfeld, H. M. (1982). Influence of culture, language and sex on conversational distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classifications and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner, J. C., & Giles, H. (Ed.). (1981). Intergroup behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Watson, D. (1982). The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent? Psychological Bulletin, 92, 682–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wicker, T. (1975). A time to die. New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Company.Google Scholar
  36. Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations