Skip to main content

Psychological Perspective in Attitude Research

  • Chapter
Attitudinal Judgment

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

The variable perspective approach to social attitudes was inspired by two events that occurred when the present authors worked together as faculty advisor and research assistant. One was a challenge by a granting agency to defend the use of Thurstone’s equal-appearing intervals scaling procedure in light of evidence that judges’ attitudes affect their judgments of opinion statements (Hovland & Sherif, 1952). The other was a televised interview of retiring President Dwight Eisenhower in which he described his manner of making political decisions. The first event led to a study in which it was demonstrated that judges whose own positions are not included in the range of statements offered for judgment act as though their positions were included, thereby effectively extending the range (Upshaw, 1962). In other words, the perspectives assumed by judges appeared to vary according to the judges’ own attitudes when those attitudes were out of the range of a set of items that were judged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bern, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carterette, E. C., & Friedman, M. P. (Eds.). (1974). Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., & Mower White, C. J. (1974). Evaluative consistency and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., & Mower White, C. J. (1975). Categorization and congruity in attitudinal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 769–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., & Osmon, B. E. (1978). Judgmental perspective and value connotations of response scale labels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 491–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., & Stroebe, W. (1972). Categorization and social judgment. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1982). Accentuation and perspective in attitudinal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 224–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. (1966). Basic concepts of measurement. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, H. W. (1926). A dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. C., Thomas, D. B., & Upshaw, H. S. (1962). Judgment of priorities for home visits. Nursing Outlook, 10, 385–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley, E. D. (1932). The influence of individual opinion on construction of an attitude scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., & Sherif, M. (1952). Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Item displacement in Thurstone scales. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, P. D. (1981). LISREL V, analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods, User’s guide. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala, Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, W. (1973). Testing a linear relationship between true scores of two measures. Psychometrika, 38, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1957). A significance test for the hypothesis that two variables measure the same trait except for errors of measurement. Psychometrika, 22, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1973). Testing if two measuring procedures measure the same dimension. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manis, M. (1982). Judging psychopathology. Paper presented at the Symposium on Social Perception in Clinical and Counseling Psychology, Texas Technological University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1958). Attenuation and interaction. Psychometrika, 23, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, P. (1969). Effects of perspective and payment on reference scale formation. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3, 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M. (1966). Perspective as an intervening construct in the judgment of attitude statements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 135–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M. (1970). Perspective as a determinant of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 280–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M., & Upshaw, H. S. (1968). Psychological perspective and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M., & Upshaw, H. S. (1970). Race differences in the judgment of attitude statements over a 35 year period. Journal of Personality, 38, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1974). Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1982). Category ratings: Still more contextual effects! In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. (1968). The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, H. H. (1976). A social psychophysical approach to reference scale principles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S., & Cohen, B. D. (1966). Referential process of speakers and listeners. Psychological Review, 73, 208–231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rule, S. J., & Curtis, D. W. (1982). Levels of sensory and judgmental processing: Strategies for the evaluation of a model. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. D., Ostrom, T. M., & Sloan, L. R. (1973). Anchoring effects of trait range in impression formation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 383–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). Perspective-mediated attitude change: When is indirect persuasion more effective than direct persuasion? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 737–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1966). On the operation known as judgment. American Scientist, 54, 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1974). Perceptual magnitude and its measurement. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tresselt, M. E. (1948). The effect of experience of contrasted groups upon the formation of a new scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 209–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1962). Own attitude as an anchor in equal-appearing intervals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 85–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1964). Opinion change vs reference scale change in the study of attitudes. Paper delivered at the 72nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1969). The personal reference scale: An approach to social judgment. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1970). The effect of unit size on the range of the reference scale. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1974). Personality and social effects in judgment. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1975). Judgment and decision processes in the formation and change of social attitudes. In M. F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (1978). Social influences on attitudes and on anchoring of congeneric attitude scales. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S. (in press). Output processes in judgment. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upshaw, H. S., Ostrom, T. M., & Ward, C. D. (1970). Content versus self-rating in attitude research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, J. (1951). Scales of judgment and their implications for social psychology. In J. R. Rohrer & M. Sherif (Eds.), Social psychology at the crossroads. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, B. (Ed.). (1982). Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (Eds.), (in press). Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Upshaw, H.S., Ostrom, T.M. (1984). Psychological Perspective in Attitude Research. In: Eiser, J.R. (eds) Attitudinal Judgment. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8251-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8251-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8253-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8251-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics