Advertisement

Systems Approach to the Study of Muscle Spindles

  • R. E. Poppele
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 7)

Abstract

This paper presents an outline of a systems analysis of the mammalian muscle spindle receptors. Such an analysis is a systematic and quantitative method of studying the behaviour of a device for which one can define an input and an output. The receptor organ is conceptually partitioned into three compartments: a mechanical filter, transducer and encoder. The contribution of each of these compartments to overall receptor behaviour is examined quantitatively. It is found that the mechanical filter of the intrafusal muscle properties can account for the slower transients and adaptations exhibited by spindles while the more rapid dynamics including the velocity and acceleration responses are probably due to properties of the mechanoelectrical transducer. The encoder is a non-linear oscillator whose operation depends on a time varying membrane leak, a quantity determined by membrane conductance and capacitance. The mean value of the leak is different for primary and secondary endings and results in a different behaviour of the respective encoders.

Keywords

Muscle Spindle Stretch Receptor Phase Lead Repetitive Firing Membrane Leak 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angers, D., 1965. Modele mecanique de fuseau neuromusculaire dé-éfferente: terminaisons primaries et secondaires. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 261, 2255–2258.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, D., 1967. The innervation of mammalian skeletal muscle. In Myotatic, Kinesthetic and Vestibular Mechanisms. Churchill, London, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  3. Beachman, W.S., Fukami, Y, and Hunt, C.C., 1971. Displacement of elements within mammalian muscle spindles. Proc. Int. Congr. Physiol. XXV 9, 46.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, I.A., 1962. The structure and innervation of the nuclear bag muscle fibre system and the nuclear chain muscle fibre system in mammalian muscle spindles. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B245, 81–136.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, I.A., 1966. The mechanical properties of mammalian intrafusal fibers. J. Physiol. 187, 10–12P.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, I.A. and Ward, J., 1969. The response of isolated cat muscle spindles to passive stretch. J. Physiol. 200, 104–105P.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, M.C., Goodwin, G.M. and Matthews, P.B.C., 1969. Aftereffects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of muscle spindle primary afferent endings. J. Physiol. 205, 677–694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, W.J. and Poppele, R.E., 1973. Static fusimotor effect on the sensitivity of mammalian muscle spindle. Brain Res. 57, 244–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, S. and Daniel, P.N., 1967. Elastic tissue in muscle spindles of man and cat. J. Physiol. 192, 10–11P.Google Scholar
  10. Emonet-Dénand, F. and Houk, J.C., 1969. Some effects of polarizing current on discharges from muscle spindle receptors. Amer. J. Physiol. 216, 404–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fohlmeister, J., 1973. A model for phasic and tonic repetitively firing neuronal encoders. Kybernetik. In press.Google Scholar
  12. Gottlieb, G., Agarwal, C.G. and Stark, L., 1969. Stretch receptor models. I. Single efferent, single afferent innervation. I.E.E.E. Trans. MMS- 10, 17–27.Google Scholar
  13. Hasan, Z. and Houk, J.C., 1972. Nonlinear behavior of primary spindle receptors in response to small, slow ramp stretches. Brain Res. 44, 680–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henatsch, H.D., 1972. Structural and functional aspects of fusimotor mechanics in mammalian muscle spindle. In Biocybernetics IV. Veb. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Leipzig, pp. 170–181.Google Scholar
  15. Houk, J.C., 1969. Rate sensitivity of mechanoreceptors. Ann.N.Y. Acad. Sci. 156, 901–916.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houk, J.C., Cornew, R.W. and Stark, L., 1966. A model of adaptation in amphibian spindle receptors. J. Theor. Biol. 12, 196–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Houk, J.C. and Stark, L., 1962. An analytical model of a spindle receptor for simulation of motor coordination. M.I.T. Res. Lab. of Electron. Quart. Progr. Rep. 66, 384–389.Google Scholar
  18. Husmark, I. and Ottoson, D., 1971. The contribution of mechanical factors to the early adaptation of the spindle response. J. Physiol. 212, 577–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kennedy, W.R. and Poppele, R.E., 1973. Sensory activity of human muscle spindles. Proc. VIII Int. Congr. of EEG and Clin. Neurophysiol. In press.Google Scholar
  20. Knight, B.W., 1972. Dynamics of encoding in a population of neurons. J. Gen. Physiol. 59., 734–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews, B.H.C., 1933. Nerve endings in mammalian muscle. J. Physiol. 713, 1–53.Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, P.B.C., 1963. The response of de-efferented muscle spindle receptors to stretching at different velocities. J. Physiol. 168, 660–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Matthews, P.B.C., 1972. Mammalian Muscle Receptors and their Central Actions. William and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, pp. 315–318.Google Scholar
  24. Matthews, P.B.C. and Stein, R.B., 1969. The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes in length. J. Physiol. 200, 723–745.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakajima, S. and Takahashi, K., 1966. Post-tetanic hyper- polarization and electrogenic Na pump in stretch receptor neurone of crayfish. J. Physiol. 187, 105–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ottoson, D. and Shepherd, G.M., 1970. Length changes within the frog muscle spindle during and after stretch. J. Physiol. 207, 747–759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Poppele, R.E., 1970. The system approach to the function of the nervous system. In Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms. Univer- sitetsforlaget, Oslo. pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
  28. Poppele, R.E. and Bowman, R.J., 1969. Linear analysis of muscle spindles. In Systems Analysis in Neurophysiology. Univ. of Minn., Minneapolis, pp. 128–140.Google Scholar
  29. Poppele, R.E. and Bowman, R.J., 1970. Quantitative description of the linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles, J. Neurophysiol. 33., 59–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Poppele, R.E. and Chen, W.J., 1972. Repetitive firing behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. J. Neurophysiol. 35 357–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Poppele, R.E. and Purple, R.L., 1971. Repetitive firing in receptor neurons. Proc. Int. Congr. Physiol. XXV 9, 457.Google Scholar
  32. Rescigno, A., Stein, R.B., Purple, R.L. and Poppele, R.E., 1970. A neuronal model for the discharge patterns produced by cyclic inputs. Bull. Math. Biophys.32, 337–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenthal, N.P., McKean, T.A., Roberts, W.J. and Terzuolo, C.A., 1970. Frequency analysis of stretch reflex and its main sybsystems in triceps surae muscles of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 33, 713–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rudjord, T., 1970a. A second order mechanical model of muscle spindle primary endings. Kybernetik 205–215.Google Scholar
  35. Rudjord, T., 1970b. A mechanical model of the secondary endings of mammalian muscle spindles. Kybernetik 7, 122–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, R.S., 1966. Properties of intrafusal muscle fibers. In Muscular Afferents and Motor Control. Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm, pp. 69–80.Google Scholar
  37. Sokolove, P.G. and Cooke, I.M., 1971. Inhibition of impulse activity in a sensory neuron by an electrogenic pump. J. Gen. Physiol. 57, 125–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stein, R.B. and French, A.S., 1970. Models for transmission of information by nerve cells. In Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo. pp. 247–258.Google Scholar
  39. Terzuolo, C.A., 1969. Systems Analysis in Neurophysiology, Univ. of Minn., Minneapolis 280 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Terzuolo, C.A. and Knox, C.K., 1971. Static and dynamic behavior of the stretch receptor organ of Crustacea. In Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 500–522.Google Scholar
  41. Zerbst, E., Dittberner, K.-H., William, E., 1966. Ansatze zur quantitativen Analyse der Nachrichtenaufnahme und-verarbeitung in biologischen Rezeptoren. Helgolander Wiss. Meersunters. 14, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Poppele
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of NeurophysiologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations