Skip to main content

Factors Affecting the Selection of a Template for the Characterization of Multiple DNA-Dependent RIMA Polymerases of Mammalian Tissues

  • Chapter
Control of Transcription

Part of the book series: Basic Life Sciences ((BLSC,volume 3))

  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

The first step in the expression of genetic information in any cell is the production of an RNA transcript from the DNA by the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Factors that regulate the expression of certain genes or classes of genes might be expected to act by some direct effect on the transcription apparatus. The general picture that has emerged from a study of gene-expression control in prokaryotes tends to support this thesis. Our understanding of the phenomenon of “polymerase-mediated control” has developed from investigations of bacteriophage infection of Escherichia coli. It is now generally accepted that host E. coli RNA polymerase transcribes at least a part of the phage genome (the “early” regions), whereas a modified host RNA polymerase (in the case of T4) or even a new phage-specified polymerase (as in the case of T7) transcribes the “late” regions (1,2). These observations suggest that the host E. coli RNA polymerase, the modified T4 polymerase, and the new phage-specified polymerase recognize different nucleotide sequences and thus bind to and transcribe from different initial binding sites (promoter sites) on phage DNA. Thus at least one “positive” control mechanism resides in the ability of different polymerase species to recognize different promoter sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Travers. Nature New Biol 229: 69 (1971).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. K. F. Bautz. In Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, Vol. 12, Academic Press, New York, p. 129 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. G. Roeder and W. J. Rutter. Nature (Lond.) 224: 234 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Kedinger, M. Gniazdowski, J. L. Mandel, Jr., F. Gissinger, and P. Chambon. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 38: 165 (1970).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. G. Roeder and W. J. Rutter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. (USA) 65: 675 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. C. J. Chesterton and P. H. W. Butterworth. FEBS Letters 12: 301 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. C. J. Chesterton and P. H. W. Butterworth. Europ. J. Biochem. 19: 232 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Kedinger, P. Nuret, and P. Chambon. FEBS Letters 15: 169 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. P. Tocchini-Valentini and M. Crippa. Nature (Lond.) 228: 993 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. H. W. Butterworth, R. F. Cox, and C. J. Chesterton. Europ. J. Biochem. 23: 229 (1971).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Grummt and R. Lindigkeit. Europ. J. Biochem. 36: 244 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Vogt. Nature (Lond.) 223: 854 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.-P. Dausse, A. Sentenac, and P. Fromageot. Europ. J. Biochem. 31: 394 (1972).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. C. Hinkle, J. Ring, and M. J. Chamberlin. J. Mol Biol 70: 197 (1972).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Weiss, T. R. Live, and C. C. Richardson. J. Biol Chem. 243: 4530 (1968).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. C. Richardson. J. Mol Biol 15: 49 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. V. Aposhian and A. Romberg. J. Biol Chem. 237: 519 (1962).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Paul and R. S. Gilmour. J. Mol Biol 34: 305 (1968).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butterworth, P.H.W., Flint, S.J., Chesterton, C.J. (1974). Factors Affecting the Selection of a Template for the Characterization of Multiple DNA-Dependent RIMA Polymerases of Mammalian Tissues. In: Biswas, B.B., Mandal, R.K., Stevens, A., Cohn, W.E. (eds) Control of Transcription. Basic Life Sciences, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4529-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4529-9_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4531-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4529-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics