Abstract
The analytical potential of nuclear interactions induced by accelerated charged particles was demonstrated during the earliest investigations into nuclear structure, when yields of some emitted radiations were interpreted in terms of the number of nuclei available for interaction in the target material. Subsequently, shortly after Hevesy(1) demonstrated that neutron irradiation could provide the basis of analytical measurement, Seaborg and Livingood(2) measured the gallium content of iron after irradiation with accelerated deuterons. Analytical techniques based upon charged-particle irradiation were initially overshadowed by methods exploiting neutron irradiation, since simple, sensitive neutron-activation procedures were available and the nuclear reactor offered an intense radiation source capable of irradiating many samples simultaneously. Application of charged-particle techniques was thus largely restricted to the determination of those elements which could not be conveniently measured after neutron activation. These were mainly light elements since (1) high specific activity could be induced in light elements by charged-particle bombardment, and (2) small quantities of characteristic activity from the element to be determined could be isolated by chemistry from large quantities of other activities induced in the sample, for example from a major constituent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. Hevesy and H. Levi, Det. Kgl. Dansk. Viden. Selsk. Math.-Fys. Medd. 14, 3 (1936).
G. T. Seaborg and J. J. Livingood, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 1784 (1938).
D. M. Holm, W. M. Sanders, W. L. Briscoe, and J. L. Parker, in Nucleonics in Aerospace (P. Polishuk, ed.) p. 306, Plenum Press, New York (1968).
T. B. Pierce, Proc. Soc. Anal. Chem. 7, 59 (1970).
Y. A. Dzemard’Yan, G. I Mikhailov, and L. P. Starehik, Ind. Lab. 37, 708 (1971).
R. F. Sippel and E. D. Glover, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 9, 37 (1960).
T. B. Pierce, P. F Peck, and W. M. Henry, Analyst 90, 339 (1965).
T. B. Pierce, P. F. Peck, and W. M Henry, Nature 204, 571 (1964).
D. J. Macey and W. B. Gilboy, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 92, 501 (1971).
E. Ricci (private communication).
V. F. Zelenskii, O. N. Khar’Kov, V. S. Kulakov, and N. A. Skakum, Protect. Met. 6, 235 (1970).
E. Moller and N. Starfelt, Aktiebelaget Atomenergi, Sweden, 237 (1966).
G. M. Padawer, Nuclear Appl. Technol. 9, 856 (1970).
W. D. Mackintosh, Nuclear Technology 13 (1972), 65.
M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 257 (1972).
T. B. Pierce, in Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Practical Aspects of Activation Analysis with Charged Particles, Liege, 1967 (H. G. Enert, ed.) Report EUR3896, d-f-e, p. 389, Brussels (1968).
G. Deconninck and G. Demortier, in Colloquium on the Application of Nuclear Methods in the Basic Metal Industries, Helsinki. 1972, I.A.E.A., Vienna (1973).
T. B. Pierce, P. F. Peck, and D. R. A. Cuff, Anal. Chim. Acta 39, 433 (1967).
R. Pretorius and P. Coetzee, J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 301 (1972).
J. F. Chemin, J. Rotuner, B. Saboya, and G. Y. Petit, J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 221 (1972).
C. Olivier and M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 313 (1972).
G. Amsel, J. P. Nadai, E. D’Artemare, D. David, E. Girard, and J. Moulin, Nucl. Inst. Meth. 92, 481 (1971).
G. Weber and L. Quaglia, J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 323 (1972).
M. Cuypers, L. Quaglia, G. Robaye, P. Dumont, and J. N. Barrandon, in Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Practical Aspects of Activation Analysis with Charged Particles, Liege. 1967 (H. G. Ebert, ed.) Report EUR3896 d-f-e, p. 371, Brussels (1968).
E. A. Wolicki and A. R. Knudson, Int. J. Appl. Rad. Isotop. 18, 429 (1967).
E. Moller, L. Nilsson, and N. Starfelt, Nucl. Inst. Meth. 50, 270 (1967).
T. B. Pierce, P. F. Peck, and D. R. A. Cuff, Analyst 97, 171 (1972).
J. Chadwick, Phil. Mag. 24, 594 (1912).
P. B. Needham and B. D. Sartwell, in Advances in X-ray Analysis (C. S. Barret, J. B. Newkirk and C. D. Rund, eds.) Vol. 14, p. 184, Plenum Press, New York (1971).
D. M. Poole and J. L. Shaw, U.K. Atomic Energy Authority Report AERE-R 5918 (1968).
G. A. Bissinger, J. M. Joyce, E. J. Ludwig, W. S. McEver, and S. M. Shafroth, Phys. Rev. A1, 841 (1970).
T. B. Johansson, R. Akselsson, and S. A. E. Johansson, Nucl. Inst. Meth. 84, 141 (1970).
T. B. Pierce, P. F. Peck, and D. R. A. Cuff, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 67, 1 (1968).
J. A. Cookson and F. D. Pilling, U.K. Atomic Energy Authority Report AERE-R-6300 (1970).
A. D. Dymnikov, T. Fishkova, and S. Yavor, Sov. Phys. Tech. Plus. 10, 340 (1965).
P. B. Price and J. R. Bird, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 69, 277 (1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pierce, T.B. (1974). Accelerator Microbeam Techniques. In: Kane, P.F., Larrabee, G.B. (eds) Characterization of Solid Surfaces. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4490-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4490-2_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4492-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4490-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive