Skip to main content

Quantum Mechanical Approximations in Quantum Field Theory

  • Chapter
Theories and Experiments in High-Energy Physics

Part of the book series: Studies in the Natural Sciences ((SNS))

Abstract

Covariant perturbation methods, developed over a quarter century ago, have since then dominated dynamical calculations in quantum field theory. Marvelously successful results can be achieved with some problems (especially in electrodynamics); but in many other contexts the technique yields no information. When the coupling constant is large, perturbation theory is useless. Even for weak coupling there remain phenomena, apparently of physical interest, which cannot easily be seen in the perturbative expansion; for example spontaneous symmetry violation, bound states, entrapment of various excitations. These cooperative, coherent effects can only be exposed by approximation procedures which do not rely on analyticity or regularity in the coupling constant. Such approximations are widely used in quantum mechanics (one does not find the properties of a complex atom or nucleus in the Born series!) and it is profitable to extend them to relativistic quantum field theory.

This work is supported in part through funds provided by the Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(11–1)-3069.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Colleagues include S. Coleman, J. Cornwall, L. Dolan, J. Goldstone, J. Kuti, L. Jacobs, K. Johnson, H. Politzer, R. Root, H. Schnitzer, E. Tomboulis, S. Weinberg.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For details see J. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2428 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Kuti, unpublished. Kuti’s work is summarized in Ref. 4. See also G. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 160, 1278 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. In statistical mechanics, analogous expressions were obtained by T.D. Lee and C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 117, 22 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.M. Luttinger and J.C. Ward, Phys. Rev. 118, 1417 (1960). In relativistic field theory the expansion was derived in Ref. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1686 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. The effective potential was introduced into field theory by Euler, Heisenberg and Schwinger. It was used in the pioneering works on symmetry breaking by Goldstone, Jona-Lasinio, Weinberg and Salam. More recent discussions are given in Ref. 7; also S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1888 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2887 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1129 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3320 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H, Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1800 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Coleman, R. Jackiw and H. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2491 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. (N−1) corrections to the Hartree-Fock approximations have been computed by R. Root, Phys. Rev. D 10, (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Kirzhnits and A. Linde, Phys. Lett. 42B, 471 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3357 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Kirzhnits and A. Linde, Lebedev Institute preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This brief synopsis of field theory at finite temperature is of course an inadequate summary of the beautiful work of Martin, Schwinger and others. For a fuller account see for example L.P. Kadanoff and G. Baym Quantum Statistical Mechanics, (W.A. Benjamin, Menlo Park, 1962). Discussions of this topic which focus on the present application are also given in Refs. 9, 14 and C. Bernard, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3312 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The mass parameter in the propagator is also the second derivative of the effective potential, see (4.10) and (4.12). Hence when it is positive for a solution to the equilibrium equations, we know that we are at a minimum.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The approximation and results of this section are familiar in statistical mechanics, where they are known as “spherical model”, “mean-field theory” etc. For a review see E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Temperature initiated phase transitions in field theory have been examined also by L. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. D (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Yildiz and B. Harrington, Phys. Rev. D. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Dashen, R. Rajaraman and S.-K Ma, Phys. Rev. D (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Wada, Tokyo University preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  25. That phase transitions can be induced by high matter density has been shown by T.D. Lee and G.C. Wick, Phys. Rev. D 9, 2291 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Nature 252, 569 (1974) and ICTP preprint, have studied field theoretic phase transitions in electromagnetic environments.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Goldstone and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D (in press). Similar results are obtained by R. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  28. H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B61, 45 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L.D. Faddeev, Max-Planck Institute preprint; A.M. Polyakov, Landau Institute preprint; S. Mandelstam, Berkeley preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Kerman and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 132, 1326 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Coleman, Harvard University preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Some of the present results have been anticipated by T. Skyrme, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 247, 260 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Some of the present results have been anticipated by T. Skyrme, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 262, 237 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dynamical symmetry violation was first discussed by Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. for global symmetries; and by J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 125, 397 (1962); 128, 245 (1962), for local symmetries. In the context of modern gauge theories, this has been explored by

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. Jackiw and K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2386 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. as well as J.M. Cornwall and R.E. Norton Phys. Rev. D 8, 3338 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. This strategy is advocated by J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2428 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. Jackiw and K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2386 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J.M. Cornwall and R.E. Norton, Phys. Rev. D 8, 3338 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. J.M. Cornwall, Phys. Rev. D 10, 500 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. see also H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. D 7, 3689 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. R. Jackiw and K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 8, 2386 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. J.M. Cornwall, Phys. Rev. D 10, 500 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Coleman and S. Weinberg, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Weinberg, Harvard University preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  48. R. Jackiw and K. Johnson, Ref. 28, footnote 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jackiw, R. (1975). Quantum Mechanical Approximations in Quantum Field Theory. In: Perlmutter, A., Widmayer, S.M. (eds) Theories and Experiments in High-Energy Physics. Studies in the Natural Sciences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4464-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4464-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4464-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics