Salient Features of Coastal Waters for Aquaculture

  • Torkild Carstens

Abstract

A useful starting point for the discussion of aquaculture potentials in any given region is the listing in Figure 1 of reasons why a species is absent (Krebs, 1972) or limited.

Keywords

Vortex Convection Chrome Phytoplankton Hydrocarbon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braaten, B. R., and R. Saetre. 1973. Breeding of salmon in Norwegian coastal waters. Fisken og havet B: 2. Institute of Marine Research, Bergen (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  2. Curl, H. J. 1972. An ecosystem study in the inside passage of southeastern Alaska. 2nd ann. conf. on estuaries, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  3. Devik, O. 1973. Bruk av flytende veksthussystem som modell for estuarmiljø. Niende nordiske symposium om vannforskning, Trondheim (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  4. Gaarder, T., and P. Bjerkan. 1934. Østers og østerskultur i Norge. AS John Griegs Boktrykkeri, Bergen (In Norwegian).Google Scholar
  5. Hollister, H. J. 1971. Observations of seawater temperature and salinity at British Columbia shore stations 1967. Fish. Res. Board of Canada, M.R.S. No. 1133.Google Scholar
  6. Jensen, S., A. Jernelov, R. Lange, and K. H. Palmork. 1970. Chlorinated byproducts from vinyl chloride production. FAO Tech. Conf. Marine Pollution, Rome, MP/70/E-88.Google Scholar
  7. Jorde, I., and N. Klavestad. 1963. The natural history of the Hardangerfjord. 4. The benthonic algal vegetation. Sarsia 9.Google Scholar
  8. Krebs, C. J. 1972. Ecology, Harper & Row. P. 16.Google Scholar
  9. Sakshaug, E. 1972. Phytoplankton investigations in Trondheimsfjord, 1963–1966. Contribution No. 153, Biological Station, Trondheim.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torkild Carstens
    • 1
  1. 1.River and Harbor LaboratoryUniversity of TrondheimTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations