Advertisement

Personality Traits and Adjustment

  • Duane Green
  • Norman Miller
  • Desy S. Gerard
Chapter
  • 41 Downloads
Part of the Perspectives in Social Psychology book series (PSPS)

Abstract

A central assumption behind the expectation that the desegregation program in Riverside would improve the academic performance of minority children was that contact with the majority Anglo children in the desegregated classroom would strengthen certain motives and values believed to be important mediators of academic achievement. Both the Coleman report (1966) itself and reanalyses of its data (e.g., Mosteller &Moynihan, 1972) have strongly suggested as much. This chapter examines personality factors that might mediate the child’s adjustment to the desegregation experience. It has been shown, for example, that anxiety partially mediates performance on intellectual tasks (Katz, 1964; Spence, 1963). Likewise, numerous other personality traits might also be expected to predict the child’s response to desegregation, and to the extent that such traits mediate adjustment, they are of particular interest to us.

Keywords

Academic Achievement Social Comparison School Achievement Black Child Achievement Motivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bettelheim, B., & Janowitz, M. Social change and prejudice. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. Bower, E. M. Early identification of emotionally handicapped children in school. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1960.Google Scholar
  3. California State Advisory Committee to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Education and the Mexican-American community in Los Angeles. 1968.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cattell, R. B. The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin, 1965.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, J. S., & staff. Equality of educational opportunities. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. Coopersmith, S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman, 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, A. L. Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1953.Google Scholar
  9. Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freud, A. The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: National University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
  11. Gerard, H. B., Blevans, S. A., & Malcolm, T. Self-evaluation and the evaluation of choice alternatives. Journal of Personality, 1964, 32, 395–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hauser, S. T. Black and white identity formation: Studies in the psychosocial development of lower socioeconomic class adolescent boys. New York: Wiley, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Katz, I. Factors influencing Negro performance in the desegregated school. American Psychologist, 1964, 19, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ketcham, W. A., & Morse, W. C. Dimensions of children’s social and psychological development related to school achievement. Cooperative Research Project No. 1286. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. Klausner, S. Z. Social class and self-concept. Journal of Social Psychology, 1953, 138, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kluckholn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. Variations in value orientations. Evanston, Ill.: Row-Peterson, 1961.Google Scholar
  17. Kuder, G. G., & Richardson, M. W. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lambert, N. M. The development and validation of a process for screening emotionally handicapped children in school. Cooperative Report No. 1186. Cooperative Research Program of Office of Education of the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1963.Google Scholar
  19. Mosteller, F., & Moynihan, D. P. (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunities. New York: Random House, 1972.Google Scholar
  20. Proshansky, A. J., Jr., & Newton, P. The nature and meaning of Negro self-identity. In M. Deutsch, I. Katz, & A. R. Jensen (Eds.), Social class, race and psychological development. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  21. Ramirez, M., Taylor, C., & Petersen, B. Mexican-American cultural membership and adjustment to school. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 4, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarason, S. B., Davidson, K. S., Lighthall, F. F., Waite, R. R., & Ruebush, B. K. Anxiety in elementary school children. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  23. Schwartz, A. J. A comparative study of values and achievement: Mexican-American and Anglo youth. Sociology of Education, 1971, 44, 438–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silberman, C. E. Crisis in Black and White. New York: Random House, 1964.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, J. T. Learning theory and personality. In J. M. Wepman & R. W. Heine (Eds.), Concepts of personality. Chicago, Ill.: Aldine Publishing Co., 1963.Google Scholar
  26. Stotland, E., & Hillmer, M. Identification, authoritarian defensiveness and self-esteem. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 333–342.Google Scholar
  27. Thome, R. B. The effects of experimentally induced failure on self-evaluations. Dissertation Abstracts, 1954, 14, 181–187.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duane Green
    • 1
  • Norman Miller
    • 2
  • Desy S. Gerard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations