Advertisement

Aortosonography — The Diagnostic Method of Choice

  • B. B. Goldberg

Abstract

Ultrasonic aortography has been established in many institutions as the screening procedure of choice in patients suspected of having abdominal aortic aneurysms since it accurately displays the overall dimensions of the aneurysm. In several cases, a marked discrepancy has been observed between the internal lumen diameter as recorded by contrast aortography and by ultrasound. The ultrasonic measurements are generally larger and conform more closely to the actual overall dimensions than do those obtained by contrast aortography (roentgenographic or nuclear). It was hypothesized that this discrepancy was due to the presence of internal clot. Indocyanine green injections into the aortic lumen, while simultaneous ultrasonic scanning was performed, confirmed this hypothesis. By utilizing grey scale B-scan equipment, echoes were often recorded from the clot helping to differentiate it from the lumen. These clinical experiments suggest that aortosonography is a more accurate method of evaluating the overall dimensions of the abdominal aorta than either nuclear or roentgenographic aortography.

Keywords

Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Aorta Superior Mesenteric Artery Grey Scale Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldberg, BB., Ostrum, BJ., Isard, HH.: Ultrasonic aortography. JAMA 198:353–358,1966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldberg, BB., Lehman, JS.: Aortosonography: Ultrasound measurement of the abdominal and thoracic aorta. Arch Surg 100:652–655, 1970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leopold, GR.: Ultrasonic abdominal aortography. Radiology 96:9–14, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leopold GR., Goldberger, LE., Bernstein EF.: Ultrasonic detection and evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery 72:939–945, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nusbaum JW., Freimanis, AK., Thomford, NR.: Echography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Surg 102:385–388, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crawford, ES., DeBakey, ME., Morris GC., Garrett, HE., Howell JF,: Aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. Surg Clin North Am 46:963–978, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robicsck, F., Daugherty, HK., Mullen, D C, Tarn, W., Scott, WP.: The value of angiography in the diagnosis of unruptured aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 2:538–550, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergan JJ., Yao, JST., Henkin, RE., Ouinn, JL.: Radionuclide aortography in detection of arterial aneurysms. Arch Surg 109:80–83, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gramiak, R., Shah, PM., Kramer, DH.: Ultrasound cardiography; contrast studies in anatomy and function. Radiology 92:939–948, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg, BB: Suprasternal ultrasonography. JAMA 215:245–250, 1971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. B. Goldberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Temple University Health Sciences CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Section of Diagnostic UltrasoundEpiscopal HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations