Crystallite Orientation in Electrodeposition of Metals

  • N. A. Pangarov


Many of the physicochemical properties of electrolytically deposited metals are determined by the crystal structure of the deposit; by the latter is usually meant the type of lattice for the metal, the crystallite size, the mutual disposition of the crystallite, and the orientation relative to the cathode substrate, as well as the type of lattice defect, the nature of any impurities, and so on.


Electrolytic Deposition Crystallite Orientation Mutual Disposition Nucleation Energy Twin Crystal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    N. Pangarov. J. Electroanalyt. Chem., 9:70 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Stranski and R. Kaischev, Z. phys. Chem., B26:100,114, 312 (1934); Ann. Phys., 23:330. (1933); Z. Phys., 36:393 (1935).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Kaischev and G. Bliznakov, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., 1:23 (1948).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Pangarov and S. Rashkov. Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., 13:555 (1960).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L M. Volmer. Kinetikder Phasenbildung, Leipzig (1939).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Brandes. Z. phys. Chem., 126:200 (1927).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Pangarov and S. Vitkova. Electrochim. Acta, 11:1719 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Pangarov and S. Vitkova. Electrochim. Acta, 11:1733 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. A. Pangarov and V. Mikhailova. Dokl. AN SSSR, 153:1119 (1963); Izv. Inst. Fiz. Khim. Bolg. AN. 4:111 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Pangarov and V. Velinov. Electrochim. Acta, 11:1753 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. M. Bozorth. Phys. Rev., 26:390 (1925).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Glocker and E. Kaupp. Z. Phys., 24:121 (1924).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. I. Matthews, S. Muttucumarana, and H. Willman. Acta Crystallogr., 14:636 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Kaishev, A. Sheludko, and G. Bliznakov. Izv. Bolg. AN, 1:137 (1950).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Sheludko and G. Bliznakov. Izv. Bolg. AN ser. fiz., 2:227 (1951).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Sheludko and M. Todorova. Izv. Bolg. AN, 3:61 (1952).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Kaishev and B. Mutefchiev. Izv. Bolg. AN, 4:105 (1954); 5:77 (1955).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Atanasov and V. Kertov. Izv. Inst. Fiz. Khim. Bolg. AN, 5:129 (1965).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Pangarov. Phys. Stat. Sol., 20:365 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Budewski, W. Bostanoff, T. Vitanoff, A. Kotzewa, and R. Kaischew. Phys. Status Solidi, 13:577 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Pangarov. Phys. Status Solidi, 20:371 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Cochrane. Proc. Phys. Soc., 48:723 (1936).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Kern. Bull. Soc. Franc. Mineral Cristallogr., 84:291 (1961).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu. M. Polukarov and Z. V. Semenova. Electrokhimiya, 2:184 (1966).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Poli and L. Peraldo. Metallurgia Ital., 51:548 (1959).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    T. H. V. Setty and H. Sillman. Trans. Faraday Soc., 51:984 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H. Schlotterer. Metalloberfläche, 18:33 (1964).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. W. De Blois. J. Appl. Phys., 36:1647 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Schwoebel. J. Appl. Phys., 37:2515 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. Pangarov
    • 1
  1. 1.Bulgarian Academy of SciencesBulgaria

Personalised recommendations