Regional growth and resource constraints
Theories of regional growth can be conveniently grouped into two categories. In the first group the growth of demand for a region’s output, particularly the growth of exports, is regarded as the essential determinant of regional growth. This role is assumed by the growth of inputs required for the production of goods and services in the second group of theories. While we shall discuss both groups of theories in section 1.2 it is important to point out at the outset that natural resources and the limitations of these resources should play an important role in both groups of theories, even though this role is not typically discussed in the literature. The neglect of natural resources and the limitations they impose on regional growth and on the growth alternatives available to a region common to all models advanced in the literature arises from the underlying assumption that natural resources are inexhaustible. If natural resources required for the production of a particular output are available in unlimited quantities, or if the nature of the production process is such that the limited supply of these resources is not destroyed in the process so that they may be reused perpetually, both groups of models would be justified in their neglect of the limitation to regional growth imposed by such resources.
KeywordsRegional Growth Government Expenditure Growth Equation Neoclassical Model Military Population
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Borts, George, ‘The Equalization of Returns and Regional Growth,’ American Economic Review, Vol. L, No. 3, June 1960, pp. 319–347.Google Scholar
- Borts, George and Stein, Jerome, Economic Growth in a Free Market, Columbia University Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- Denison, Edward F., The Sources of Economic Growth in the U.S. and the Alternatives Before Us, Supplementary Paper No. 13, Committee for Economic Development, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
- Ghali, Moheb, ‘Exports, Investment and Regional Growth,’ The Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, October 1973.Google Scholar
- Ghali, M.; Akiyama, M. and Fujiwara, J., ‘Factor Mobility and Regional Growth,’ The Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Meyer, John R., ‘Regional Economics: A Survey,’ American Economic Review, Vol. LIII, No. 1, March 1963, pp. 19–54.Google Scholar
- Polenske, Karen R., State Estimates of the Gross National Product, Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, 1972.Google Scholar
- Psacharopoulous, George, The Anatomy Of A Rate Of Growth: The Case of Hawaii, 1950–1960, Economic Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1969.Google Scholar
- Smith, Donald M., ‘Regional Growth: Interstate and Intersectoral Factoral Reallocation,’ The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. LVI, No. 3, August 1974.Google Scholar
- Smith, Donald M., ‘Neoclassical Growth Models and Regional Growth in the U.S.,’ Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 15, No. 2, August 1975.Google Scholar
- State of Hawaii, Department of Planning and Economic Development: Alternative Futures For Hawaii’s Visitor Growth, Research Report 73–5, August 1973.Google Scholar
- Teibout, Charles M., The Community Economic Base Study, Supplementary Paper No. 16, Committee for Economic Development, New York, 1962.Google Scholar