Abstract
One of the most well-known results from the standard micro theory is that competition is more efficient than monopoly. This result seems to be taken for granted in the antitrust policy of most countries. Even if most economists do not question the result, a fervent discussion about the quantitative degree of welfare losses due to monopoly has taken place in recent years. The analysis is largely based on losses of consumer surplus. The social welfare loss (the deadweight loss) arising from monopoly refers to the net reduction of consumers’ surplus, i.e. the excess of the loss of consumers’ surplus over the monopolist’s gain in profits, the latter being regarded as a transfer of income from the consumers. Thus the concept of welfare losses or welfare gains utilized for this purpose totally neglects the distributional consequences of changes in resource allocation. The neoclassical approach to this issue is outlined in Figure 1. It produces an unambigous loss of social welfare from market power and constitutes a forceful case in favour of an antitrust policy (see Rowley 1973).
The author wishes to thank Harold Dickson, Leif Johansen and Ajit Singh for their valuable comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bergson, A., On Monopoly Welfare Losses.American Economic Review63 (5), 853–870, 1973.
Comanor, W. S. and H. Leibenstein, Allocative Efficiency, X-Efficiency and the Measurement of Welfare Losses.Economica36, 304–309, 1969.
De Prano, M. E. and J. B. Nugent, Economies as an Antitrust Defence: Comment.American Economic Review59 (5), 947–953,1969.
Ferguson Esposito, F. and L. Esposito, Excess Capacity and Market Structure.Review of Economics and Statistics56 (2), 188–194, 1974.
Frisch, R.,Theory of Production, D. Reidel Publishing Co/Dordrecht-Holland, 1965.
Førsund, R. F. and L. Hjalmarsson, On the Measurement of Productive Efficiency,Swedish Journal of Economics76 (2), 141–154, 1974.
Haldi, J. and D. Whitcomb, Economies of scale in Industrial Plants.Journal of Political Economy75 (4), 373–385, 1967.
Harberger, A. C., Monopoly and Resource Allocation.American Economic Review44, 77–87, 1954.
Hjalmarsson, L., Optimal Structural Change and Related Concepts.Swedish Journal of Economics75 (2), 1973.
Hjalmarsson, L ., The Size Distribution of Establishments and Firms Derived from an Optimal Process of Capacity Expansion.European Economic Review5,1974.
Johansen, L.,Production Functions, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1972.
Kamerschen, D. R., Welfare Losses from Monopoly.Western Economic Journal1966 (4), 221–36.
Koo, S-E., A Note on the Social Welfare Loss Due to Monopoly.Southern Economic Journal37 (2), 212–214, 1970.
Leibenstein, H., Allocative Efficiency vs. X-efficiency.American Economic Review56 (3), 392–415, 1966.
Parry, T. G., Plant Size, Capacity Utilization and Economic Efficiency: Foreign Investment in the Australian Chemical Industry.Economic Record50 (2), 218–244, 1974.
Pratten, C. F ., Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industries, Department of applied economicsOccasional PapersNo. 28, Cambridge University Press, 1971.
Renck, O.,Investeringsbedo∂mning i några svenska fo∂retag. (Investment appraisal in some Swedish firms) Nordstedt Stockholm 1966. (Second printing 1972).
Ribrandt, G .,Stordriftsfo∂rdelar inom industriproduktionen, SOU 1970: 30 Stockholm 1970. (Economics of scale in industrial production). (The Swedish Government
Ross, P ., Economies as an Antitrust Defense: Comment.American Economic Review58 (5), 1371- 1372,1968.
Rowley, C. K.,Antitrust and Economic Efficiency, Macmillan Studies in Economics London 1973.
Schwartzman, D., The Burden of Monopoly.Journal of Political Economy68 (6), 627–630,1960.
Sherman, R.,Oligopoly. Lexington Books, D. C. Heath and Company Lexington 1972.
Siegfried, J. and T. Tiemann, The Welfare Costs of Monopoly: An Inter-Industry Analysis.Economic Inquiry12 (2), 190–203, 1974.
Silberston, A., Economies of Scale in Theory and Practice.Economic Journal82 (special issue), 369- 391,1972.
Stigler, G. J., The Statistics of Monopoly and Merger.Journal of Political Economy64 (1), 33–40, 1956.
Sutton, C. J., Advertising, Concentration and Competition,Economic Journal84 (1), 56–69, 1974.
Williamson, O. E., Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Trade-offs.American Economic Review58 (1), 18–36,1968.
Williamson, O. E., Economies as an Antitrust Defense: Correction and Reply.American Economic Review58 (5), 1372–1376,1968.
Williamson, O. E ., Economies as an Antitrust Defense: Reply.American Economic Review59 (5), 954- 959,1969.
Wohlin, L.,Skogsindustrins strukturomvandling och expansionsmo∂jlighet. Industrins Utredningsinstitut, Stockholm 1970 with an English summary: Forest-Based Industries: Structural Change and Growth Potentials.
Worcester, D. A. Jr., New Estimates of the Welfare Loss to Monopoly United States: 1956–1969.Southern Economic Journal40 (2), 234–245, 1973.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 H. E. Stenfert Kroese B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hjalmarsson, L. (1977). Monopoly Welfare Gains and the Costs of Decentralization. In: Jacquemin, A.P., de Jong, H.W. (eds) Welfare aspects of industrial markets. Nijenrode Studies in Economics, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4231-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4231-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4233-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4231-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive