Skip to main content

Control of Behavior by Noxious Stimuli

  • Chapter
Handbook of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The control of behavior by noxious stimuli has both historical and contemporary importance in behavioral pharmacology. The development of chlorpro-mazine as a treatment for psychosis stimulated a great deal of interest in the behavioral effects of drugs. The initial pharmacological studies of chlorpromazine included experiments in rats showing that it suppressed a rope-climbing response in the presence of an auditory stimulus previously associated with electric shocks (Courvoisier et al., 1953). Later, Cook and Weidley (1957) showed that chlorpromazine could suppress responses that occurred during a stimulus period preceding the delivery of an electric shock (avoidance responses) at doses that did not affect responses evoked by the shock itself (escape responses). The results obtained with these procedures led to a search for drugs that might be more effective than chlorpromazine in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, and also prompted speculation about how these drugs were acting. It was generally assumed that drugs such as chlorpromazine had selective effects on avoidance responses because they decreased fear and anxiety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anger, D., 1963, The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.6:477–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., 1959, Punishment and recovery during fixed-ratio performance, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.2:301–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., 1960, Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.3:123–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., and Holz, W. C., 1966, Punishment, in: Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application (W. K. Honig, ed.), pp. 380–448, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Holz, W. C., and Hake, D. F., 1962, Intermittent reinforcement by removal of a conditioned aversive stimulus, Science136:781–782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Holz, W. C., and Hake, D. F., 1963a, Fixed-ratio punishment, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.6:141–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Holz, W. C., Hake, D. F., and Allyon, T., 1963b, Fixed-ratio escape reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.6:449–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Hopwood, J., and Powell, J., 1967, A rat chamber and electrode procedure for avoidance conditioning, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.10:291–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. E., 1976, Effects of alcohol, chlordiazepoxide, cocaine and pentobarbital on responding maintained under fixed-interval schedules of food or shock presentation, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.196:605–615.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. J., JR., and Harrison, J. M., 1957, Relation between stimulus intensity and strength of escape responding, Psychol. Rep.3:3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, L. D., 1969, Responding in the cat maintained under response-independent electric shock and response-produced electric shock, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.12:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., 1973, The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior, Behaviorism1:103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. C., and Steele, B. J., 1966, Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under a multiple schedule in the rat, Psychopharmacologia9:157–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., and Catania, A. C., 1964, Effects of drugs on avoidance and escape behavior, Fed. Proc. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp. Biol.23:818–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., and Davidson, A. B., 1973, Effects of behaviorally active drugs in a conflict-punishment procedure in rats, in: The Benzodiazepines (S. Garattini, E. Mussini, and L. O. Randall, eds.), pp. 327–345, Ravan Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., and Kelleher, R. T., 1963, Effects of drugs on behavior, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.3:205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L., and Weidley, E., 1957, Behavioral effects of some psychopharmacological agents, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.66:740–752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Courvoisier, S., Fournel, J., Ducrot, R., Kolsky, M., and Koetschet, P., 1953, Propriétés pharmacodynamiques du chlorhydrate de chloro-3(diméthylamino-3′-propyl)-10 phénothiazine, Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn.92:305–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. B., and Cook, L., 1969, Effects of combined treatment with trifluoperazine-HCl and amobarbital on punished behavior in rats, Psychopharmacologia15:159–168.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. B., 1958, Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.122:137–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. B., 1974, What is analgesia?, in: Narcotic Antagonists—Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology (M. C. Braude, L. S. Harris, E. L. May, J. P. Smith, and J. E. Villarreal, eds.), Vol. 8, pp. 235–243, Raven Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews, P. B., and Morse, W. H., 1961, Behavioral pharmacology, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.1:145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A., 1962, Variable-interval escape from stimuli accompanied by shocks, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.5:41–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A., and Winograd, E., 1958, Shock intensity in variable-interval escape schedules, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.1:145–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, D. A., and Woods, J. H., 1975, Naloxone negative reinforcement in rhesus monkeys: Effects of schedule, dose, and narcotic regimen, Pharmacol. Rev.27:397–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E., 1973, Aversive control, in: The Study of Behavior—Learning, Motivation, Emotion, and Instinct (J. A. Nevin and G. S. Reynolds, eds.), pp. 239–279, Scott, Foresman and Co., Glenview, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foree, D. D., Moretz, F. H., and Mcmillan, D. E., 1973, Drugs and punished responding II: d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.20:291–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, I., and Seifter, J., 1960, The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat, Psychopharmacologia1:482–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, I., and Seifter, J., 1962, The effects of monourethans, di-urethans, and barbiturates on a punishment discrimination, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.136:284–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, I., Kulak, J. T., Jr., and Seifter, J., 1962, The effects of chlordiazepoxide and chlorpromazine on a punishment discrimination, Psychopharmacologia3:374–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, I., Bachman, E., and Seifter, J., 1963, Effects of reserpine and morphine on behavior suppressed by punishment, Life Sci.1963(4):226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glowa, J. R., and Barrett, J. E., 1976, The effects of alcohol on punished and unpunished responding of squirrel monkeys, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.4:169–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. R., Hoffmeister, F., Schlichting, U. U., and Wuttke, W., 1971, Aversive properties of nalorphine and naloxone in morphine-dependent rhesus monkeys, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.179:268–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graeff, F. G., 1974, Tryptamine antagonists and punished behavior, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.189:344–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graeff, F. G., and Schoenfeld, R. I., 1970, Tryptaminergic mechanisms in punished and nonpunished behavior, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.173:277–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, D. F., and Azrin, N. H., 1963, An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkeys, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.6:297–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, G. A., and Boff, E., 1962, Continuous avoidance as a base-line for measuring behavioral effects of drugs, Psychopharmacologia3:264–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., and Hineline, P. N., 1966, Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.9:421–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, H. S., 1966, The analysis of discriminated avoidance, in: Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application (W. K. Honig, ed.), pp. 499–530, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman, S. G., and Jewett, R. E., 1971, Interactions of morphine and nalorphine with physostigmine on operant behavior in the rat, Psychopharmacologia22:384–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holz, W. C., and Azrin, N. H., 1962, Interactions between the discriminative and aversive properties of punishment, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.5:229–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M., 1952, The effects of noxious stimulus intensity and duration during intermittent reinforcement of escape behavior, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.45:538–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M., 1956, The maintenance of escape behavior under fixed-ratio reinforcement, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.49:153–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., and Morse, W. H., 1964, Escape behavior and punished behavior, Fed. Proc. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp. Biol.23:808–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., and Morse, W. H., 1968a, Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.11:819–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., and Morse, W. H., 1968b, Determinants of the specificity of the behavioral effects of drugs, Ergeb. Physiol.60:1–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., and Morse, W. H., 1969, Schedules using noxious stimuli. IV. An interlocking shock-postponement schedule in the squirrel monkey, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.12:1063–1079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., 1941, Light-aversion in the white rat, Psychol. Rec.4:235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., and Schoenfeld, W. N., 1950, Principles of Psychology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maickel, R. P., Cox, R. H., Jr., Miller, F. P., Segal, D. S., and Russell, R. W., 1969, Correlation of brain levels of drug with behavioral effects, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.165:216–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1968, Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation, Science160:1249–1251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1969, Fixed-interval schedules of electric shock presentation: Extinction and recovery of performance under different shock intensities and fixed-interval durations, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.12:301–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1972a, Schedule-dependent effects: Effects of drugs, and maintenance of responding with response-produced electric shocks, in: Schedule Effects: Drugs, Drinking, and Aggression (R. M. Gilbert and J. D. Keehn, eds.), pp. 3–25, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1972b, Maintenance and suppression of responding under schedules of electric shock presentation, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.17:425–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1973, Methamphetamine effects on responding under a multiple schedule of shock presentation, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.1:547–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1974, Effects of d-amphetamine, morphine and chlorpromazine on responding under fixed-interval schedules of food presentation or electric shock presentation, J. Pharmacol Exp. Ther.190:141–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., 1976, Punishment of responding under schedules of stimulus-shock termination: Effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.26:281–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mckearney, J. W., and Barrett, J. E., 1975, Punished behavior: Increases in responding after d-amphetamine, Psychopharmacologia41:23–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mcmillan, D. E., 1973a, Drugs and punished responding I: Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.19:133–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mcmillan, D. E., 1973b, Drugs and punished responding. III. Punishment intensity as a determinant of drug effect, Psychopharmacologia30:61–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mcmillan, D. E., 1975, Determinants of drug effects on punished responding, Fed. Proc. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp. Biol.34:1870–1879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. H., and Kelleher, R. T., 1966, Schedules using noxious stimuli. I. Multiple fixed-ratio and fixed-interval termination of schedule complexes, J. Exp. Anal. Behav.9:267–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. H., and Kelleher, R. T., 1970, Schedules as fundamental determinants of behavior, in: The Theory of Reinforcement Schedules (W. N. Schoenfeld, ed.), pp. 139–185, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. H., and Kelleher, R. T., 1976, Determinants of reinforcment and punishment, in: Handbook of Operant Behavior (W. K. Honig and J. E. R. Staddon, eds.), pp. 174–200, Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, E. F., 1972, Induction and the provenance of operants, in: Reinforcement, Behavioral Analyses (R. M. Gilbert and J. R. Millenson, eds.), pp. 1–34, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., 1953a, Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal, Science118:157, 158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., 1953b, Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.46:253–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F., 1938, The Behavior of Organisms, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F., 1953, Science and Human Behavior, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. B., 1964, Effects of d-amphetamine upon operant behavior of pigeons: Enhancement by reserpine, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.146:167–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J. H., Downs, D. A., and Carney, J., 1975, Behavioral functions of narcotic antagonists: Response-drug contingencies, Fed. Proc. Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp. Biol.34:1777–1784.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morse, W.H., McKearney, J.W., Kelleher, R.T. (1977). Control of Behavior by Noxious Stimuli. In: Iversen, L.L., Iversen, S.D., Snyder, S.H. (eds) Handbook of Psychopharmacology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4214-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4214-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4216-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4214-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics