Application of Piagetian Theory to Remediation of Reasoning

  • Beth Stephens
Part of the Topicsin Cognitive Development book series (TOPCOGDEV)

Abstract

A decade or more has elapsed since Piaget was “rediscovered,” and during the intervening years there have been continued and varied attempts to incorporate his theory into classroom practices. Although Piaget has been a prolific author, he has not supplied a guide book on “How to Practice Piaget” and probably will not! Yet guidelines do evolve as one reviews his theoretical writings. Throughout his work there is a recurring theme: intellectual development proceeds as the child interacts with his environment—with the objects and people around him. He states that “a child knows an object only to the extent to which he has acted upon it.” When urged to cite the educational approach that was most compatible with his theory, he stated that perhaps it was Dewey’s learning by doing—an active student situation.

Keywords

Sugar Clay Rubber Income Posit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Inhelder, B., The diagnosis of reasoning in the mentally retarded. New York: John Day, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Karplus, R. Subsystems and variables: The science curriculum improvement study. Chicago: Rand McNaËy, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Mapping: Making maps and mapping games. Educational Development Center Elementary Science Study. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Piaget, J. The child’s conception of number. New York: Humanities, 1952.Google Scholar
  5. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. La genèse des structures logiques élémentaires: Classification et sériation. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlê, 1959.Google Scholar
  6. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. Les images mentales. Traité de Psychologie, 1963, 1, 65–100.Google Scholar
  7. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. Cognitive assessments. Personal communication, University of Geneva, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. Pote, J. Module. Reproductory mental imagery. (Cognitive Remediation Research Project: Student Activity Manual). Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Dallas, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Simpkins, K. Module: Formal logic. (Cognitive Remediation Research Project: Student Activity Manual). Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Dallas, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Sower, R. Module: Cooking activities. (Analysis and Training of Reasoning Research Project: Student Activity Guide). Unpublished manuscript, Philadelphia Child Guidance Center, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Stephens, W. B., & Simpkins, K. The reasoning, moral judgment, and moral conduct of the congenitally blind (Final Report, Project No. OEG-O-72–5464). Philadelphia: Temple University, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Stephens, W. B., & Simpkins, K. Cognitive remediation in persons congenitally blind (Project No. OEG-O-74–7445). Philadelphia: Temple University, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Taylor, J. L., & Walford, R. Simulation in the classroom. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Walton, J. Logical-mathematical thinking and the pre-school classroom. College Park, Md,: Head Start Regional Resource and Training Center, 4321 Hartwick Road, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. Wexler, M. Module: Combinatory logic. (Cognitive Remediation Research Project, Student Activity Manual). Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Dallas, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. Wolff, P. H. What Piaget did not intend. Proceedings of the Fourth Interdisciplinary Seminar on Piagetian Theory and Implications for the Helping Professions. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth Stephens
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TexasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations