Advertisement

Physical Properties of Bronchial Secretion

  • Peter Mitchell-Heggs
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 89)

Abstract

The apparatus used to estimate apparent viscosity should be applicable over a range of applied shear. The basic capillary viscometers which are intended for Newtonian, constant-viscosity materials are not suitable here. The type of apparatus most commonly used for the investigation of the viscosity of biological materials is the rotational viscometer. Most of the apparatus used today is based on Couette’s model. The need for more precise rheological data and advances in engineering and electronics have produced a range of instruments which have been used for the study of biological materials. They include the Rotovisco (Stresemann, 1968) Bruce and Kumar, 1968; Bamberg, 1968; Kinghorn and Addis, 1968) and the Merrill-Brookfield instruments (Sheffner, et al., 1964; Liebermann, 1968, Aiache, et al., 1970). These instruments are extremely useful for determining viscosity at relatively higher shear rates, but do not permit detailed examinations to be carried out at low applied shear.

Keywords

Shear Rate Cystic Fibrosis Apparent Viscosity Applied Shear Bronchial Secretion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiache, J.M., Pradelle, J. and Molina, C. (1970). Poumon., 26, 35.Google Scholar
  2. Bamberg, H. (1968). Med.Welt (Stuttg.), 37, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Blanshard, G. (1955). Arch.Middx.Hosp., 5, 222.Google Scholar
  4. Bruce, R.A. and Kumar, V. (1968). Brit.J.Clin.Pract., 22, 289.Google Scholar
  5. Charman, J. and Reid, L. (1972). Biorheol., 9, 185.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, S.S. and Dippy, J.E. (1969). Biorheol., 6, 11.Google Scholar
  7. Feather, E.A. and Russel, G. (1970). Brit.J.Dis.Chest, 64, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldfarb, H. and Buckberg, A.S. (1964). Clin.Res., 12, 291.Google Scholar
  9. Keal, E. (1970). Poumon., 26, 51.Google Scholar
  10. Kinghorn, F.C. and Addis, G.J. (1968). Phys.Med.Biol., 13, 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liebermann, J. (1968). Amer.Rev.Resp.Dis., 97, 654.Google Scholar
  12. Mitchell-Heggs, P.F. (1973). Bull.Physio.Path.Resp., 9, 163.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell-Heggs, P.F. (1974). Ph.D. Thesis, London University.Google Scholar
  14. Mitchell-Heggs, P.F., Palfrey, A.J. and Charman, J. (1971). Abst. VII European Congress of Rheumatology, Brighton, March 1971.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell-Heggs, P.F., Palfrey, A.J. and Reid, L. (1974). Biorheol., 11, 417.Google Scholar
  16. Palmer, K.N.V., Ballantyne, D., Diament, M.L. and Hamilton, W.F.D. (1970). Brit.J.Dis.Chest, 64, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reid, L. (1970). Proc.Roy.Inst.Gr.Br., 43, 438.Google Scholar
  18. Sheffner, A.L., Medier, E.M., Jacob, L.W. and Sarett, H.P. (1964). Amer.ref.Res.Dis., 90, 721.Google Scholar
  19. Stresemann, E. (1964). Klin.Wschr., 42, 1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sturgess, J. (1970). 5th International Cystic Fibrosis Conference, Cambridge. (Ed.) Lawson, D. Cystic Fibrosis Research Trust, London.Google Scholar
  21. Sturgess, J., Palfrey, A.J. and Reid, L. (1970). Clin.Sci., 38, 145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Mitchell-Heggs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineCharing Cross Hospital Medical SchoolLondonUK

Personalised recommendations