Skip to main content

The Effects of Solar UV-B Radiation (280–315 nm) on Higher Plants: Implications of Stratospheric Ozone Reduction

  • Chapter
Research in Photobiology

Summary

For each 1% reduction in the atmospheric ozone column there would be a predictable increase of approximately 2% in solar UV-B radiation weighted for biological effectiveness, UV-BBE. Yet, physiological manifestations reflecting the net unrepaired damage to higher plants would not necessarily increase as a linear function of the UV-BBE enhancement. Recent evidence shows that for impairment of photosynthetic capacity, the response to UV-BBE was quite nonlinear. There was, however, no apparent threshold of UV-BBE to which the plants must be exposed before photosynthetic damage ensued and reciprocity in the response to UV-B applied over a considerable period of time. If the accumulative mode of damage to the photosynthetic apparatus is generally applicable to higher plants, even moderately UV-B resistant species may be affected by small increases in UV-B radiation, if such species possess long-lived leaves which are exposed to full sunlight. Because higher plant species appear to be differentially sensitive to UV-B radiation, the ecological significance of ozone reduction may lie more in changes in the competitive balance of species rather than in reduced primary productivity per se. The differential UV-B sensitivity of higher plant species may be related to the optical properties of tissues covering physiological targets and the efficacy of repair mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Green, A.E.S., Sawada, T., and Shettle, E.P., Photochem. Photobiol., 19, 251 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bener, P., Technical Report, U.S. Army, London, Contract No. DAJA 37-68-C-1017, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giese, A. C., in “Photophysiology” (A.C. Giese, ed.), Vol. II, p. 203. Academic Press, N.Y., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caldwell, M. M., in “Photophysiology” (A.C. Giese, ed.), Vol. VI, p. 131. Academic Press, N.Y., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knapp, E., Reuss, A., Riesse, O., and Schreiber, H., Naturwissenshaften, 27, 304 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollaender, A., and Emmons, C. W., Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 9, 179 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, L. N., and Merinova, G. L., Biofizika, 6, 21 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glubrecht, H., Z. Naturforsch. B, 8, 17 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stadler, L.J., and Uber, F. M., Genetics, 27, 84 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luckiesch, M., Applications of Germicidal, Erythemal, and Infrared Energy, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caldwell, M.M., Ecol. Monogr., 38, 243 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirby-Smith, J.S., and Craig, D.L., Genetics, 42, 176 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curry, G.M., Thimann, K.V., and Ray, P.M., Physiol. Plant., 99, 429 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nachtwey, D.S., in “Impacts of Cliiftatic Change on the Biosphere: Part 1 Ultraviolet Radiation Effects” (D.S. Nachtwey, M.M. Caldwell and R.H. Biggs, eds), p 3–50. U.S. Dept. Transportation, Wash., D.C., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sisson, W.B., and Caldwell, M.M., Plant Physiol., (in press) (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Biggs, R.H., Sisson, W.B., and Caldwell, M.M., in “Impacts of Climatic Change on the Biosphere: Part 1 Ultraviolet Radiation Effects” (D.S. Nachtwey, M.M. Caldwell and R.H. Biggs, eds), p 4–34. U.S. Dept. Transportation, Wash, D.C., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lautenschlager-Fleury, D., Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges., 65, 343 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cline, M.G., Conner, G.I., and Salisbury, F.B., Plant Physiol. 44, 1674 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howland, G.P., Nature, 254, 160 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dütsch, H.U., Can. J. Chem. 52, 1491 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Christie, A.D., Pure Appl. Geophys., 106, 1000 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eddy, J.A., Science, 192, 1189 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caldwell, M.M. (1977). The Effects of Solar UV-B Radiation (280–315 nm) on Higher Plants: Implications of Stratospheric Ozone Reduction. In: Castellani, A. (eds) Research in Photobiology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4160-4_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4160-4_62

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4162-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4160-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics