Advertisement

A Comparative Study of Several Survival Responses of Mammalian Cells After UV and After X-Irradiation

  • G. M. Hahn
  • G. C. Li
  • J. Braun

Summary

Dose response curves were obtained from Chinese hamster cells irradiated in different growth stages and under different nutritional conditions with either X-ray or ultraviolet light. All X-ray survival curves were asymptotically exponential, while the shape of the UV-curves was bi-phasic. Survival of X-irradiated cells was much less influenced by cultural factors than survival of cells exposed to UV. Recovery of cells from potentially lethal damage had a T1/2 of 1–2 h after exposure to the ionizing irradiation, while it took considerably longer to recover 50% of the UV induced damage. Similarly “fixation” of X-ray damage was relatively rapid (T1/2 ⋍ 30 min) compared to “fixation” of UV damage (T1/2 ⋍ 3.5 h). Finally, exposure of cells to 43°C for 1 h immediately after X-irradiation resulted in synergistic cell killing and subsequent complete inhibition of recovery from potentially lethal damage. On the other hand similar heat treatment of UV-exposed cells resulted only in additive cell killing and did not inhibit recovery.

Keywords

Survival Response Plateau Phase Nitrogen Mustard Chinese Hamster Cell Lethal Damage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, K.C., Youngs, D.A., and Van der Schueren, E., (1975) in Molecular Mechanisms for Repair of DNA (P.C. Hanawalt and R.B. Setlow, eds.), Part B, pp. 443–451, Plenum Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleaver, J.E., (1973) Cancer Res. 33, 362–369.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epstein, J., Williams, J.R., and Little, J.B., (1973) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, S.-J., Hahn, G.M., and Bagshaw, M.A., (1966) Exp. Cell Res. 42, 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hahn, G.M., Stewart, J.R., Yang, S.-J., and Parker, V., (1968) Exp. Cell Res. 49, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hahn, G.M., (1975) Radiat. Res. 64, 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ray, G.R., Hahn, G.M., Bagshaw, M.A., and Kurkjian, S., (1973) Cancer Chemother. Rpts. Part I, S7, 473–475.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, S.-J., Hahn, G.M., and Van Kersen-Bax, I., (1970) Photochem. Photobiol. 11, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hahn, G.M., (1974) Cancer Res. 34, 3117–3123.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, G.C., Evans, R.G., and Hahn, G.M., (in press) Radiat. Res.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Regan, J.D., and Setlow, R.B., (1974) Cancer Res. 34, 3718.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. M. Hahn
    • 1
  • G. C. Li
    • 1
  • J. Braun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations