Abstract
‘Accounting records the past and the present; economics considers bygones to be bygones and treats with the present and the future.’ Many professionals in both fields have been content with this division of responsibility. Accountants, in particular, in determining the present values of future events have drawn in large part on the economists’ arsenal of analytical tools. More recently, in their efforts to fashion income concepts that take into account future prospects as opposed to past accomplishments, some accountants have conceded that the economic concept of income is the ideal.1 In this view, the accounting concept of income will differ from the economic concept only because practical difficulties of measurement prevent accountants from directly measuring the ideal itself.
The author is undebted to Philip W. Bell for perceptive comments on an earlier draft. (The views expressed are not necessarily shared by the Ford Foundation.)
1. The Inflation Accounting Committee, for example, has taken the following position (1975, p. 30): ‘In practice… other concepts (of profit) must be considered which approximate to (economic income) and which are capable of practical application.’ We shall argue that the Committee may be selling its own concept short. See also Lawson, 1975.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baxter, W.T ., Accounting Values and Inflation (McGraw-Hill, 1975).
Bell, P.W., ‘On Current Replacement Costs and Business Income’, in R.R. Sterling, ed., Asset Valuation (Scholars Book Co., 1971).
Chambers, R.J ., Accounting, Evaluation and Economic Behavior (Prentice-Hall, 1966).
Edwards, E.O., Depreciating Policy under Changing Price Levels, The Accounting Review (April 1954).
Edwards, E.O., ‘Depreciation and the Maintenance of Real Capital,’ in J.L. Meij, ed., Depreciation and Replacement Policy (North Holland, 1961).
Edwards, E.O., ‘The State of Current Value Accounting,’ The Accounting Review (April 1975).
Edwards, E.O. and Bell, P.W., The Theory and Measurement of Business Income (University of California Press, 1961.)
Enthoven, A.J.H., Accountancy and Economic Development Policy (North-Holland, 1973).
Fisher, I., The Nature of Capital and Income (Macmillan, 1906).
Hicks, J.R., Values and Capital, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, 1946).
Inflation Accounting Committee, Inflation Accounting (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,) 1975.
Lindahl, E., Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital (Allen & Unwin, 1939).
Little, I.M.D. and Mirrlees, J.A., Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries (Heinemann, 1974).
Parker, R.H. and Harcourt, G.C., eds., Readings in the Concept and Measurement of Income (Cambridge University Press, 1969).
Solomons, D., ‘Economic and Accounting Concepts of Cost and Value,’ in M. Backer, ed., Modern Accounting Theory (Prentice-Hall, 1966).
Sterling, R.R., Theory of the Measurement of Enterprise Income (University Press of Kansas, 1970).
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 H.E Stenfert Kroese B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edwards, E.O. (1978). The Primacy of Accounting Income in Decisions on Expansion: An Exercise in Arithmetic. In: van Dam, C. (eds) Trends in managerial and financial accounting. Nijenrode Studies in Business, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4062-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4062-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4064-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4062-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive