Advertisement

Systematic Desensitization of Erectile Impotence: A Controlled Study

  • G. Kockott
  • F. Dittmar
  • L. Nusselt
Part of the Perspectives in Sexuality book series (PISE)

Abstract

The preceding chapters in this part dealt with the etiology of erectile dysfunction as well as the more common forms of treatment for this dysfunction.

In this article, Kockott, Dittmar, and Nusselt attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of systematic desensitization in the treatment of impotence. This study is based on a sample of twenty-four men, and care was taken to “match” the subjects in the three different treatment groups. A waiting list control group, which did not receive any treatment, was used to evaluate effectiveness of therapy. These factors are important to note as clinical outcome studies such as this are often criticized on the basis of not being methodologically rigorous.

The use of three methods for evaluating treatment outcome in this study (behavioral description, subjective report, and physiological response) is important to note. Reliance on one method alone increases the chance that the Jinal data may not be totally accurate.

This concern is especially relevant to research in the area of sexual dysfunction where a patient subjective report of arousal, for example, may contradict his or her physiological response (see Heiman, Part II, Chapter 8).

Keywords

Erectile Dysfunction Sexual Intercourse Wait List Wait List Control Group Sexual Fantasy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bancroft, J. H. J., Jones, H. G., and Pullan, B. R. A simple transducer for measuring penile erection, with comments on its use in the treatment of sexual disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1966, 4, 239–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brengelmann, J. C. Deutsche Validierung von Fragebogen der Extraversion, neurotischer Tendenz undRigidität. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Agnewandte Psychologie, 1960, 7, 291–331.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, A. J. A factual study of male potency disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1968, 114, 719–731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Friedman, D. The treatment of impotence by Brietal relaxation therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1968, 6, 257–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garfield, Z., McBrearty, J., and Dichter, M. A case of impotence successfully treated with desensitization combined with in vivo operant training and thought substitution. In R. D. Rubin and C. M. Franks (Eds.), Advances in behavior therapy. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
  6. Kraft, T., and Al-Issa, I. The use of methohexitone sodium in the systematic desensitization of premature ejaculation. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1968, 114, 351–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lazarus, A. A. The treatment of a sexually inadequate man. In L. P. Ullmann and L. Krasner (Eds.), Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965. Pp. 243–245.Google Scholar
  8. Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. Human sexual inadequacy. London: Churchill, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Saltzman, L. F. Systematic desensitization of a patient with chronic total impotence. In R. D. Rubin and C. M. Franks (Eds.), Advances in behavior therapy. New York: Academic Press, 1969. Pp. 131–137.Google Scholar
  10. Wolpe, J. A., and Lazarus, A. A. Behavior therapy techniques: A guide to treatment of neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kockott
    • 1
  • F. Dittmar
    • 1
  • L. Nusselt
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institut für PsychiatrieMünchenWest Germany

Personalised recommendations