Abstract
There is a growing recognition that the major crisis of modern psychology is its lack of any integrative general paradigm and language to unify its ever more fragmented subdisciplines both among themselves and with extrapsychological theoretical breakthroughs and tendencies. This crisis is currently being addressed most fruitfully by two schools of psychology, which superficially stand in polar opposition to one another. At the one extreme, we find existential-phenomenological psychologists1 proposing an integrative paradigm under their umbrella, and at the other extreme we find neuropsychology/physiological psychology (e.g., Karl Pribram’s approach),2 making their prescriptions. Strangest of all, we find that the representatives of these two extremes, identified loosely in the popular mind with mentalism and “brainism,” respectively, are proposing similar remedies, using similar or at least convergent language, and even quoting some of the same sources (e.g., Brentano, Husserl, and William James on intentionality, volition, and the structure of consciousness).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brentano, F. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, I. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1955.
Gallup, G. G. Self-recognition in primates: A comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 329–338.
Gallup, G. G., McClure, M. K., Hill, S. D., & Bundy, R. A. Capacity for self-recognition in differentially reared chimpanzees. Psychological Record, 1971, 21, 69–74.
Gibson, J. J. A theory of direct visual perception. In J. R. Royce, & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.), The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach, 1972.
Giorgi, A. Psychology as a human science. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
Husserl, E. Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. New York: Collier, 1962.
Husserl, E. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Jonas, H. The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. New York: Delta, 1966.
Lacan, J. The language of the self. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.(a)
Lacan, J. The mirror phase as formative of the I. New Left Review, 1968, 51, 71–77.(b)
Lashley, K. S. In F. A. Beach, D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan, & H. W. Nissen (Eds.), The neuropsychology of Lashley: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
Luria, A. R. The working brain. London: Penguin, 1973.
Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962.
Merleau-Ponty, M. The structure of behavior. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.
Merleau-Ponty, M. Maurice Merleau-Ponty at the Sorbonne, Bulletin de Psychologie, 1964, 236(18), 3–6.(a)
Merleau-Ponty, M. The child’s relations with others. In M. Merleau-Ponty, The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1964.(b)
Moss, D. M. Distortions in human embodiment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, New York, New York, November, 1977.(a)
Moss, D. M. Transformations in body image following intestinal bypass surgery. In A. Giorgi, C. T. Fischer, & E. L. Murray (Eds), Duquesne papers in phenomenological psychology (Vol. II). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1977.(b)
Moss, D. M. Brain, body, and world: Perspectives on body image. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Moss, D. M. & Keen, E. The nature of consciousness. I: The phenomenological approach. Paper presented as part of the symposium “The Nature of Consciousness” at the American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, August, 1978.
Penfield, W. Mystery of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
Pribram, K. Toward a holonomic theory of perception. In S. Ertel, L. Kemmler, & M. Stadler (Eds.), Gestalttheorie in der modernen Psychologie Köln: Erich Wengenroth, 1975.
Pribram, K. Self-consciousness and intentionality. In G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. I). New York: Plenum, 1976.(a)
Pribram, K. Problems concerning the structure of consciousness. In G. Globus, G. Maxwell, & I. Savodnik (Eds.), Consciousness and the brain. New York: Plenum, 1976.(b)
Pribram, K. Mind, it does matter. In S. F. Spicker & H. T. Engelhardt (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions of the neuromedical sciences. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing, 1976.(c)
Pribram, K. & Gill, M. Freud’s project reassessed. New York: Basic Books, 1976.
Straus, E. Phenomenological psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
Straus, E. The Archimedean point. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Duquesne University Press, 1980.
Tart, C. T. Transpersonal realities or neuropsychological illusions? Toward an empirically testable dualism. Paper presented as part of the symposium “The Nature of Consciousness” at the American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, August, 1978.
Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.
Zaner, R. The way of phenomenology: Criticism as a philosophical discipline. New York: Pegasus, 1970.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moss, D.M. (1989). Phenomenology and Neuropsychology. In: Valle, R.S., von Eckartsberg, R. (eds) Metaphors of Consciousness. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3802-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3802-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-43119-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3802-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive