Abstract
The question “What percentages of mammalian carcinogens and noncarcinogens can be predicted by bacterial mutation tests?” probably cannot be answered for the following two reasons:
-
1.)
There seems to be no universal agreement upon what criteria are absolutely necessary to unequivocally establish a carcinogen for mammals. Consequently, the bull’s eye of the target for which the bacterial tests must aim continually shifts, causing the results of comparisons conducted at one point in time to be adjusted at a different point in time.
-
2.)
Carcinogen results are not obtained for “mammals”, they are obtained in unique mammalian species which often differ among themselves as to whether a particular chemical is a carcinogen or not. Bacterial tests might hopefully match the results in a single mammalian model but cannot be expected to match the combined results from several mammalian species which fail to agree among themselves as to the correct answer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Machlan, J.A., A. Wong, G.H. Degen, and J.C. Barrett (1982) Morphological and neoplastic transformation of Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts by diethylstilbestrol and its analogs. Cancer Res. 42:3040–3045.
Bartsch, H., L. Tomatis and C. Malaveille (1982) Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of environmental chemicals. Regulatory Toxicol, and Pharmacol. 2:94–105.
Chu, K., C. Cueto, and J.M. Ward (1981) Factors in the evaluation of 200 National Cancer Institute Carcinogen Bioassays. J. Toxicol, and Environ. Health 8:251–280.
Dunkel, V.C. (1979) Collaborative studies on the Sa1monel1a/microsome mutagenicity assay. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 62:874–882.
Nakamuro, K. and Y. Sayato (1981) Comparative studies of chromosomal aberration induced by trivalent and pentavalent arsenic. Mut. Res. 88:73–80.
Siou, G., L. Conan, and M. el Haitem (1981) Evaluation of the c1astogenic action of benzene by oral administration with 2 cytogenetic techniques in mouse and Chinese hamster. Mut. Res. 90:273–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brusick, D. (1983). Evaluation of Chronic Rodent Bioassays and Ames Assay Tests as Accurate Models for Predicting Human Carcinogens. In: Milman, H.A., Sell, S. (eds) Application of Biological Markers to Carcinogen Testing. Environmental Science Research, vol 29. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3790-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3790-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3792-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3790-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive